DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Arizona Coyotes Final Roster
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
26
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Utah
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Utah
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Arizona Coyotes Final Roster
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
jamathon
Member Since
Jan. 9, 2022
Favourite Team
Toronto Maple Leafs
Forum Posts
501
Posts per Day
0.6
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 19 at 2:55 p.m.
Thread:
garbage
dude? leafs decline. Knies isnt tradeable and if he was u guys would be giving us a 1st rounder plus other picks to move out ur bad players
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 19 at 2:51 p.m.
Thread:
2024-25
leafs accept
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 19 at 2:49 p.m.
Thread:
Early Rumours On Here
leafs decline. thats a overpayment and we dont need ristolionen
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 19 at 2:43 p.m.
Thread:
hope
leafs accept. no need to add that prospect
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 19 at 2:28 p.m.
Thread:
next year
Leafs decline. We dont want ur bad defense
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 18 at 10:21 p.m.
Thread:
next season
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>Los Angeles has no interest in another RhD or an undersized bottom-6 left-handed forward to play behind Byfield, Fiala, Moore and Kempe and less than no interest in SDA.</div></div>
where do u think Robertson and liljegren moves to?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 14 at 3:39 p.m.
Thread:
playoff lines
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jaok3</b></div><div>Nylander will never be a guy to go in the corners and take a hit to make a play.
Matthews never makes the big hit which he could and NEVER gets involved in scrums to support teammates.
Marner undersized plays similar to Nylander but does give the occasional hit.
JT gets hit hard a lot and nobody comes to his defense. He does hit and will also take one to make a play.
These guys will never change their style of play the leafs just haven't had the cap space left to get the proper supporting group.</div></div>
Yes, I know this. Which is why you put them all on the same line. So they are forced to do it themselves.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 13 at 4:34 p.m.
Thread:
playoff lines
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jaok3</b></div><div>Knies or Bert on the topline would be there for their corner work and net presence. You have removed that element putting Nylander on the topline. Why?
Bert-Matthews-Marner
Jarnkrok-Domi-Nylander
Knies-JT-McMann
Dewar-Kampf-Reaves/Holmberg</div></div>
After watching the leafs for years it makes sense loading up the top line and have them learn to do stuff themselves. They’re taking up most of the cap and it unrealistic to rely on players with low cap hits like knies, Ritchie, bunting, bertuzzi (not a low cap hit but also just doesn’t fit), jarnkrok. Those guys aren’t built for high minutes. Knies is a rookie and already playing on a top line which might hurt his game as he has to adjust being the 3rd guy on a top line rather than a player who just needs to improve and start his career. He plays well with them rn but not great. Also will benefit the top guys because there won’t be anyone to help them during scrums. They would have to learn to be team players and do it themselves. Might help them be more aggressive and motivated to grab the puck in the corners. The top players set the tone for the team and that’s something most people don’t understand. Although I still understand and respect ur decision with what u want for the playoffs. I just feel there needs to be more of an initiative out of the top guys
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 6 at 12:14 a.m.
Thread:
Parayko and Dowd
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mokumboi</b></div><div>Uhh what now? His contract is fine. What sucks is that you somehow imagine that this garbage offer can;t be beat. Dude, teams have been calling nonstop for him since before the Cup season. A late 1st, a small forward who can't stay in one piece and a B prospect that is the exact opposite of what the Blues are looking for does NOT get you a genuine 1RD with 12M of retention. Your garbage offer doesn't even come anywhere near paying for just the retention.
You guys up there have a problem.</div></div>
So you don’t have a problem paying a defender 6.5m until he’s 37? Players mostly decline in their 30s. Recently 34 has been a big number. Parayko is already declining.
You guys still haven’t proposed an offer. That’s how I know you guys hop on this website just to argue because you think you know everything lmao. I’ve been right with lots of trades in the past so Ik how to value players. You can’t make me feel wrong because you’re too attached to your top defender. Lets not forget that you guys are also in a retool which can take another 2-3 years. It’s best for the Blues to trade Parayko now. no one else will make what the Maple Leafs are offering. And that’s on you guys for having to retain 12M. Next time give your defender a better deal for your org.
You guys up there have a problem
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 5 at 7:50 p.m.
Thread:
Parayko and Dowd
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SharkTank</b></div><div>Yeah let's retain 6 1/2 more years of Parayko at 2 mil AAV!
Leafs will give you a crap return and tell you how awful he is just so they can justify the turd sandwich they're giving you!
But Leafs fans will continue creating Parayko to Leafs CFACGMs every half hour!</div></div>
Nobody is saying he's bad. His contract sucks and you know that. No other team in the NHL will be willing to give up what we are for him which is why they'll accept. Calling a 1st round pick, Robertson and Hirvonen a turd sandwich is crazy considering their potential and value. Next time maybe don't sign a bad contract. Maybe give me your trade proposal?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 1 at 7:41 p.m.
Thread:
Borgan and Toropchenko
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JMSTL2019</b></div><div>He scored a between-the-legs power move goal vs MTL a few weeks ago, you Leaf fans should give him some respect.</div></div>
Ignore Carleton. I think he might be trolling. Although I think the Blues could consider trading him depending on the return.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 1 at 7:25 p.m.
Thread:
Borgan and Toropchenko
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Carleton</b></div><div>Mcmann has been fine since being called up and our bottom 6 seems to be doing okay. Torpchenko sucks lmao. no need to spend assets on bad 4th liners</div></div>
Reavo? Mcmann? Why are you bringing up leaf players I have no intention of replacing? You're the definition of a bad Leaf fan. You don't know everything. maybe look at some stats every now and then to make your point. Who are we gonna play when we have 2 injured players on the roster? Steeves? Abruzzese? they haven't played any NHL games this season to indicate that they are ready.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 1 at 7:15 p.m.
Thread:
Borgan and Toropchenko
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Carleton</b></div><div>Just keep reavo in the lineup lol. Torop isn't good or needed</div></div>
yes, he is needed. We need depth and a stronger team. LOL
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 1 at 7:09 p.m.
Thread:
Borgan and Toropchenko
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Carleton</b></div><div>Does Toropchenko even add anything to our lineup? He's just another meh 4th liner</div></div>
size, hits, blocks, 8 goals, penalty killer.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 29 at 10:38 p.m.
Thread:
Lyubushkin 75 retained
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>leaffanio</b></div><div>i dont understand the double retention</div></div>
There’s another defensive man the leafs are trying to acquire. Could be Larsson with retention
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 29 at 2:20 p.m.
Thread:
Seattle Trade
the 2 thirds are not necessary
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 29 at 1:58 p.m.
Thread:
Peeke and Borgen
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Leafs_Enthusiast</b></div><div>Peeke trades fine... Wouldn't do the Borgen trade although I do love him</div></div>
why not?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 29 at 1:55 p.m.
Thread:
Peeke and Borgen
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>KingExLeafs</b></div><div>Overpay in both trades</div></div>
for the Borgen trade, I would have to agree. I didn't want a million comments from people saying that I underpaid. Definitely would take out Kokkonen or Hirvonen
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 29 at 1:53 p.m.
Thread:
Peeke and Borgen
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mmccRed198913</b></div><div>You wanna see a mistake fest watch Peeke for more than 2 minutes.</div></div>
IK but maybe the coaching staff can help him. Having him for 3 years at 1.7M is a lot better then having Liljegren for 3M. And if Peeke could return to being a useful defensive defenseman it'll be worth it. either way, this is just all my speculation based on what the insiders are saying and if CBJ scouts/GM found what they were looking for when they attended the Marlies game. Ik it's not ideal but it's better then paying Liljegren 3M to play on our 3rd pair. Could even get Peekes contract retained a little more if it doesn't cost much
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 29 at 1:29 p.m.
Thread:
Peeke and Borgen
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mmccRed198913</b></div><div>What the heck did Liljegren do to this fanbase?</div></div>
He’s a good player but makes too many mistakes. We also need a physical guy. We can’t go into another Boston series or Florida series with a soft team.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 26 at 8:31 p.m.
Thread:
McBain and Borgen
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dannibalcorpse</b></div><div>ah the classic "this guy is so much better than the guy I'm trading for!" CF logic.
Robertson isn't a bad player but he has an injury history longer than your average CVS receipt. MIettinen is another 5'9" winger who's not rated all that well in a pretty bad prospect system and has to be considered to be a risk to not sign, considering he's a college senior only a few months from becoming a UFA.
McBain might not score as much as Robertson, but that's not necessarily his job. He's a 6'3" 3rd liner who won't kill you at C and hits anything that moves, and holds his own on the PK as well. He's still young enough to be an important role player moving forward, so there's really no impetus for the Coyotes to trade him - meaning you'd probably have to overpay to get him out of the desert. This doesn't count as an overpay in my eyes.</div></div>
Make the playoffs and then comment
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 26 at 7:50 p.m.
Thread:
McBain and Borgen
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Yotes269</b></div><div>The entire point is we don’t need an undersized skilled 3LW, he’ll never progress and pass Keller, Maccelli, or Crouse. We also have plenty like him in the pipeline already. What we don’t have is a physical bottom 6 C who can produce and hit, which is exactly why you’re trying to make this trade in the first place, you don’t have it either and you do have other skilled undersized wings.</div></div>
Great point but you guys are still in last place. You guys already have crouse, Bjugstad and o Brian. All physical guys but can’t shoot. You guys have a lot of young players who still need time to develop. Maple leafs don’t need a 3rd center we’re just gonna use him as a winger if anything. Robertson can still be better than Maccelli. I think it’s still too soon to shut the door on Robertson as he’s shown a lot of progress this year. He could play a lot better for you guys as there is less pressure.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 26 at 7:14 p.m.
Thread:
McBain and Borgen
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>bwhsocal</b></div><div>lets hear this one. what history?
lets look at this trade AZ would get - undersized W not in top 10 of TML pool (which is amongst the worst), an undersized oft injured skilled W (get in line behind keller, schmaltz, maccelli, guenther, carcone) really isnt that great need for AZ. AZ gives up 23yo physical C (by far their worst position at NHL and in pool) penciled in as 3C for long time and a 3rd next year. Yeah that is a laugh arse off and hang up</div></div>
You just said a lot of nothing lmao. Robertson is a lot better than McBain if you would just watch both of the players it's obvious that Robertson is more skilled and has more points. McBain will never be a center on the third line as he has a 43% faceoff win percentage. Yes, McBain can still get a few points but was never a scorer. Robertson is already playing on the 3rd line and is scoring more points in fewer games than McBain and with more takeaways in fewer minutes. His potential is far better than McBain but yet again you're telling me he's not lmao. Robertson is already better and he played 50 games less than McBain in his entire NHL career.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 26 at 6:26 p.m.
Thread:
McBain and Borgen
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>bwhsocal</b></div><div>AZ laughs as they hang up</div></div>
We know they do. They don't have a good trade history so that would make sense.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 26 at 6:26 p.m.
Thread:
McBain and Borgen
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>boltsfan71</b></div><div>yotes pass</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>littlejerryseinfeld</b></div><div>Teams don't typically dump good players with term</div></div>
I agree
First
2
3
Next
Page 2
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com