GiggywithGibby Profile - CapFriendly

Forum: Armchair-GM54 minutes ago

Why would Anaheim bother with that? We take the worse goalie, retain the better goalie down, and do it for no payment.

Forum: Armchair-GM1 hour ago

Wasn't a Ducks fan, Macs not available, and even if he was, Marner doesn't have that kind of trade value, Toronto would be the ones adding.

McTavish is absolutely untouchable.

Forum: Fauteuil - DG2 hours ago

Thread: crazy demidov Necas

If it's Mallioux instead of Matheson maybe, but we're not taking any LHD.

Forum: Armchair-GM4 hours ago

Thread: Go bigger

<a href="/users/OldNYIFan" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@OldNYIFan</a> <a href="/users/GeneralLandro" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@GeneralLandro</a> <a href="/users/LosPatos" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@LosPatos</a> thoughts?

Forum: Armchair-GM5 hours ago

Thread: Montreal Canadiens

Once again, Anaheims not interested in a quantity return. You want Zegras, offer quality.

Forum: Armchair-GM5 hours ago

Thread: Tyson Anahiem

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Tysdog34</b></div><div>I guess i wasnt too descriptive but the point of this was to make them good now sorry about that.</div></div>

You haven't, though. The ghosts of John Tavares and Jonny Gauedreau on the first line, the softest 3rd pair in the league, third line improvements that could have been made through FA with better options, pissing away our future starter for two years of Markstrom, the list goes on and on.

Not to mention how wildly the trades vary in favor. No one's giving up assets for the final year of Tavares deal, you outright fleced Arizona, you overpaid for Markstrom, and they have Wolf so why take Dostal. Just all around bad.

Forum: Armchair-GM6 hours ago

Thread: Tyson Anahiem

Sure, set the rebuild back 5 years and ruin the team while you're at it.

Forum: Armchair-GM6 hours ago

Thread: Plan the parade

Don't know how many times we have to send this message north if the border.

McTavish is unavailable, full stop, end of discussion, no ifs, ands, or buts about it, don't ask for him, it'll never happen.

Marner doesn't have that kind of trade value even if he'd waive for Anaheim.

Marners already overpaid for what he provides, his next contract will absolutely be a problem unless he takes a steep discount, and at that point he may as well stay in Toronto. He's shown he's not the guy to build around, he's a perimeter support player being payed like he's a franchise cornerstone.

Forum: Armchair-GM7 hours ago

Thread: Google Gemini created team

AIs Intel is out of date, Sharks need a veteran center, Anaheim has some.

Forum: Armchair-GM16 hours ago

Thread: Does Vegas like Marner

Im sure they like him, it's a question of having the cap space for him

Forum: Armchair-GM19 hours ago

Thread: Balance

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JEL</b></div><div>Vatrano only has 1 year left and Fowler an aging 33 year old defencemen probably past his prime. A 1st 3rd, young top 9 goal scorer and a B prospect seems like a fair haul. Can’t see any other team giving up anything more for 1 year of Vatrano and 33 year old Fowler.</div></div>

Picks three drafts from now, an undersized forward having trouble sticking his place on Toronto's roster, and with a massive medical history, and you want retention. That's wholey unappealing.

Forum: Armchair-GM20 hours ago

Thread: Balance

I don't see anything in that offer that's particularly appealing for Anaheim to take

Forum: Armchair-GM20 hours ago

Thread: 3way Sway

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>FriendlyGhost</b></div><div>I'm not saying <em>for</em> you. Talking their overall value in a trade.

He trades Lysell for Zegras but Helenius for Swayman. Lysell is far and away a better prospect than Helenius.</div></div>

I'm aware, and I'm saying it's probably fair value straight up, but it's wouldn't be a trade we were interested in taking. Lysell and a 20s pick on the other hand is very underwhelming.

There's also the problem of LA not having enough cap space to make the deal work.

Forum: Armchair-GM20 hours ago

Thread: 3way Sway

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>FriendlyGhost</b></div><div>Pretty sure even Anaheim fans will agree that Swayman is worth more than Zegras... What the hell.</div></div>

Nope, maybe even value straight up, but we also don't need a goalie, we do need scoring.

Forum: Armchair-GM22 hours ago

Thread: MTL Day Dreaming 2024-25

Any other crap you want to pile into the Zegras offer? You don't want to dump Gallagher too?

Forum: Armchair-GM22 hours ago

Thread: Get top Center

Values probably fine straight up, but we don't need a goalie, so it doesn't work for us.

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 5:01 p.m.

Thread: Go bigger

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>vikhodush</b></div><div>Not quite sure on the value but Strome is an interesting option that I hadn’t seen before.

He fits RH C box that they’re very open about going after. Just not sure if he’s impactful enough to bank on. Haven’t watched him since he went to ANA but remember when watching him on the rags thinking he probably shouldn’t be a 2C on a contender.</div></div>

He's pretty much the same he was in NYR, just paid 500k more. Issue being Anaheim can't take on a RW without moving one out, we're not moving Terry for Necas, and no one's wanting Killorn the other way.

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 2:28 p.m.

Thread: 2024-25 Leafs

Liljigren doesn't have that kind of trade value, and even if he did, he's not a target for Anaheim

Forum: Fauteuil - DGYesterday at 2:21 p.m.

Thread: Habs summer

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Zegrasnoob</b></div><div>Maybe Anaheim can get dvorak with a salary retention ?</div></div>

All of this falls under the assumption that we want Dvorak, and you haven't explained that reasoning yet.

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 2:16 p.m.

Thread: My thoughts

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CoolHandL</b></div><div>Fair enough if that's what he wants to do, although I wouldn't call Rossi easy to play against.</div></div>

Compared to McTavish, he very much is. Verbeek hasn't drafted a single player below 6' while in Anaheim, he wouldn't have interest in Rossi.

Forum: Fauteuil - DGYesterday at 2:13 p.m.

Thread: Habs summer

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Zegrasnoob</b></div><div>To get Harris ? They need a young DD</div></div>

We can get third pairing guys in FA, and have better DD in the pipeline already.

Dvorak is owed way more money than his cap hit, and he's overpaid at his cap hit, it's going to be incredibly hard to convince a small market team to take him.

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 2:10 p.m.

Thread: My thoughts

McTavish is completely untouchable, especially for a Smurf. Verbeeks trying to build a team that's hard to play against, installing a 5'9" 2C is antithetical to that goal.

Forum: Fauteuil - DGYesterday at 2:03 p.m.

Thread: Habs summer

We're not taking Dvorak, end of discussion.

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsYesterday at 2:03 p.m.

Thread: Trevor for marner

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SuperMario66</b></div><div>You're right, he's probably more than twice as good. Zegras' value is in free fall right now, he played terribly this year. I doubt the leafs would want to do this.</div></div>

Cool story bro. He's a 23 year old who had his season derailed by injuries, he'll be fine next year, and unlike Toronto, were under no pressure to make a change.

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 11:41 a.m.

Thread: Quack quack

There's no sense trading Z for a guy knocking on the door of 30 who's contract has a good chance to become a problem before it's over. If Z gets traded for someone it's going to be a 25 year old or younger.

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

GiggywithGibby

Future Ducks legend

Member Since

Favourite Team

2nd Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day