SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Ideal Lines

Created by: honeynutchelios
Team: 2017-18 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 8, 2017
Published: Oct. 8, 2017
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2018
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2019
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the ANA
2020
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$75,000,000$63,903,128$3,558,000$1,565,000$11,096,872
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 6
$863,333$863,333
C, RW
UFA - 1
$778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
LW, RW
UFA - 3
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$650,000$650K)
RW, C
UFA - 2
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 6
$800,000$800,000 (Performance Bonus$200,000$200K)
LW, C
NTC
UFA - 1
$4,550,000$4,550,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 4
$2,800,000$2,800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
$750,000$750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$717,500$717,500 (Performance Bonus$107,500$108K)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$925,000$925,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
$750,000$750,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 6
$6,875,000$6,875,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 7
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
LD/RD
UFA - 1
$3,850,000$3,850,000
RD
UFA - 5
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 2
$900,000$900,000
LD
UFA - 1
$872,500$872,500
LD
UFA - 2
$650,000$650,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
$5,275,000$5,275,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 4
$650,000$650,000
RD
UFA - 1
$700,000$700,000
RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Oct. 9, 2017 at 9:00 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 202
I'm going to have to disagree on this being "ideal" lines.
The most obviously reason among others is that you have both Rutta and Forsling on the wrong sides.
Oct. 10, 2017 at 9:19 a.m.
#2
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 16,248
Likes: 10,792
Quoting: Hockeyplayer1
I'm going to have to disagree on this being "ideal" lines.
The most obviously reason among others is that you have both Rutta and Forsling on the wrong sides.


That and I really like the physicality that Panik brings to that top line. They're playing really well! I'm a big fan or Hartman and absolutely think he can play the #1RW. I've been on here a lot saying that, but (while a very small sample size) Hartman and Schmaltz together have been great! Schmaltz driving up the ice, Hartman being hard nosed and Kane doing his dangle seems to work well. I still think AA is more than capable to be the #2C, but Center Depth is huge and getting some scoring out of that 3rd line with Sharp, AA, Debrincat would be insanely good.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll