SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Interested in the reaction

Created by: Hockeyplayer1
Team: 2024-25 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 1, 2024
Published: Jul. 1, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I'm not even sure how I feel about this trade but I want to see what others think. This is obviously a trade without a pre-signed Marner extension.

Hawks would have an insane hole on the right side with Jones gone but I think in the end it could make then better in the future overall. Need to sign or trade for a RHD here still.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$775,000
Trades
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2025
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2026
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2027
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$88,000,000$76,550,500$0$4,500,000$11,449,500
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,500,000$4M)
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,400,000$5,400,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,250,000$4,250,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,250,000$4,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LW, C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,037,500$4,037,500
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,300,000$1,300,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,600,000$4,600,000
LD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,250,000$4,250,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,400,000$4,400,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,300,000$3,300,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$918,333$918,333 (Performance Bonus$1,000,000$1M)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$775,000$775,000
RD
RFA

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mon. at 6:16 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 566
Likes: 253
No team will be reading for Seth Jones without retention , and it’s hard to see Hawks retaining significant $ for 6 years…so no chance. Hard to imagine Marner waives to join 2nd worse team in league
Mon. at 6:21 p.m.
#2
uWu Garak
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2024
Posts: 873
Likes: 1,248
If you want reactions. Just go back to the ArmchairGM page, sort by Toronto, and look at all the trades involving CHI over the last few months. A lot of those proposals involve a swap of Marner for Jones. It is not well received by CHI fans.
Hawksguy81 liked this.
Mon. at 6:29 p.m.
#3
Hawks Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 2,859
Likes: 1,942
Quoting: MitchMafia
No team will be reading for Seth Jones without retention , and it’s hard to see Hawks retaining significant $ for 6 years…so no chance. Hard to imagine Marner waives to join 2nd worse team in league


FORMER second worst team in the league. We plan to be better next season lol. Also Marner wants to be with his best friend Bertuzzi. :P
Mon. at 6:35 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 10,038
Likes: 12,643
Hawks aren't trading away assets for a one year Marner rental.
Bedsy_Burner liked this.
Mon. at 6:59 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 202
Quoting: Bedsy_Burner
If you want reactions. Just go back to the ArmchairGM page, sort by Toronto, and look at all the trades involving CHI over the last few months. A lot of those proposals involve a swap of Marner for Jones. It is not well received by CHI fans.

I’m not sure why hawks fans would be so against this? You should be expecting Levshunov to be the top RHD in like two years.

Hawks would obviously push hard to sign Marner long term.
Bedsy_Burner liked this.
Mon. at 7:27 p.m.
#6
uWu Garak
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2024
Posts: 873
Likes: 1,248
Quoting: Hockeyplayer1
I’m not sure why hawks fans would be so against this? You should be expecting Levshunov to be the top RHD in like two years.

Hawks would obviously push hard to sign Marner long term.


Because Marner is going to command a raise from what is already a very expensive contract. Most of his prime will be squandered on a rebuilding/developing team, and then when we are ready to contend he will more than likely be in decline and his contract will be in the way of signing other contracts. We have no one to take Jones place NOW, and even when Levshunov is ready to make the leap to the NHL, it is highly unlikely he will be a top pairing defender right off the bat. Because we like Jones and have a crapload invested in him. Because we don't undervalue Reichel after just one poor season. Because we have zero interest in an injury prone undersized forward, in Robertson, who frankly has no place on CHI's roster. And so on.

Also, with both of them having full NMC's, it is unlikely that either player is willing to waive for the other team, let alone both of them.
Mon. at 7:40 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 202
Quoting: Bedsy_Burner
Because Marner is going to command a raise from what is already a very expensive contract. Most of his prime will be squandered on a rebuilding/developing team, and then when we are ready to contend he will more than likely be in decline and his contract will be in the way of signing other contracts. We have no one to take Jones place NOW, and even when Levshunov is ready to make the leap to the NHL, it is highly unlikely he will be a top pairing defender right off the bat. Because we like Jones and have a crapload invested in him. Because we don't undervalue Reichel after just one poor season. Because we have zero interest in an injury prone undersized forward, in Robertson, who frankly has no place on CHI's roster. And so on.

Also, with both of them having full NMC's, it is unlikely that either player is willing to waive for the other team, let alone both of them.


Are you suggesting here that you’d rather keep Reichel than get Robertson?

I’d agree with the part about Marner but none of the rest. And would argue that having Marner at the end of a next contract is FAR better than having Jones at the end of his.
Mon. at 7:55 p.m.
#8
uWu Garak
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2024
Posts: 873
Likes: 1,248
Quoting: Hockeyplayer1
Are you suggesting here that you’d rather keep Reichel than get Robertson?

I’d agree with the part about Marner but none of the rest. And would argue that having Marner at the end of a next contract is FAR better than having Jones at the end of his.


One awful season, in what was essentially his rookie season, on the second worst team in NHL, that had a mountain of injuries for more than half the season, isn't going to make CHI give up on him. Especially when he was thrust into a top 6 center role right off the bat with almost no help. Reichel is the player we saw in 22-23 and what we saw this season after he was sent down to the AHL for a month and who he was at the Worlds last month. He is not the player we saw for most of this season. Giving up on him for an undersized injury riddled forward that has no place in the future of CHI makes very little sense, especially after the signings CHI has already made today on the opening of free agency. Robertson is worth a 3rd at best. Also, Reichel's toolkit and skill set matches what CHI is trying to build more closely.

So, yes, I am suggesting that.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll