SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Yolo

Created by: CanucksJhett
Team: 2024-25 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 28, 2024
Published: Jun. 28, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Just a "for fun" build. Linus Karlsson is just a placeholder though he'd have as good a crack at the job as anyone.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,250,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$4,500,000
2$2,900,000
Trades
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2025
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2026
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2027
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$88,000,000$87,450,834$0$0$549,166
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$5,800,000$5,800,000
LW, RW, C
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$11,600,000$11,600,000
C, LW
UFA - 8
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$775,000$775,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,600,000$1,600,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C, LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,650,000$6,650,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,800,000$1,800,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,950,000$4,950,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$775,000$775,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$825,000$825,000
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, LW
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,850,000$7,850,000
LD
UFA - 3
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,250,000$7,250,000
RD
UFA - 8
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,250,000$1,250,000
G
RFA
$2,900,000$2,900,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$775,000$775,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$775,000$775,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$816,667$816,667
LW
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 28 at 11:59 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 3,477
Likes: 2,365
I really feel like moving Hoglander for a rental is a bad choice because that means that they still are really lacking a winger. I also like EP2 a lot as a future Dman.

I imagine if they went for someone like Buch they may offer something like Raty a first and maybe a second
CanucksJhett liked this.
Jun. 28 at 12:01 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2024
Posts: 29
Likes: 6
Quoting: Warpbox
I really feel like moving Hoglander for a rental is a bad choice because that means that they still are really lacking a winger. I also like EP2 a lot as a future Dman.

I imagine if they went for someone like Buch they may offer something like Raty a first and maybe a second


Fair and valid points across the board. I'm of the belief they could find a way to resign Buchnevich to really make it worth their while, but I agree if it were for just one year it's likely far too risky! I also think Lekkerimaki will be ready within the next season or two, but that's tough to predict.
Warpbox liked this.
Jun. 28 at 12:25 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 3,179
Likes: 1,603
Quoting: Warpbox
I really feel like moving Hoglander for a rental is a bad choice because that means that they still are really lacking a winger. I also like EP2 a lot as a future Dman.

I imagine if they went for someone like Buch they may offer something like Raty a first and maybe a second


I don't see any reason for the Blues to really want Raty. I'm not saying he's a bad prospect. But he probably fits right in with Dean and Kaskimaki in terms of our forward prospect grouping and that's still like 6th in line depending on where you view Bolduc and that's without factoring in Kyrou,Thomas, and Neighbors.

It's certainly not unfair, and I can understand not wanting to move on from Hoglander if you're buying a player too as he's going to help with your depth scoring. I'd imagine that Petterson, a 25 1st and a 3rd or something in like 26 or whatever is probably what the Blues would be looking for.

That's assuming they're going to trade him this offseason. There's just not alot of reason to add forward prospects right now, this is an extremely strong forward prospect pool currently and we have 3+ guys already on the roster who are likely long term core members.
Warpbox and CanucksJhett liked this.
Jun. 28 at 12:30 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2024
Posts: 29
Likes: 6
Quoting: AC14
I don't see any reason for the Blues to really want Raty. I'm not saying he's a bad prospect. But he probably fits right in with Dean and Kaskimaki in terms of our forward prospect grouping and that's still like 6th in line depending on where you view Bolduc and that's without factoring in Kyrou,Thomas, and Neighbors.

It's certainly not unfair, and I can understand not wanting to move on from Hoglander if you're buying a player too as he's going to help with your depth scoring. I'd imagine that Petterson, a 25 1st and a 3rd or something in like 26 or whatever is probably what the Blues would be looking for.

That's assuming they're going to trade him this offseason. There's just not alot of reason to add forward prospects right now, this is an extremely strong forward prospect pool currently and we have 3+ guys already on the roster who are likely long term core members.


I appreciate the reply, AC! Of course this is just a what if type team I've built here. Just racking my brain today on what the Canucks may try if they miss out on Guentzel in FA!
Jun. 28 at 12:40 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 3,179
Likes: 1,603
Quoting: CanucksJhett
I appreciate the reply, AC! Of course this is just a what if type team I've built here. Just racking my brain today on what the Canucks may try if they miss out on Guentzel in FA!


I think the consensus right now is that it's about 75/25 Blues re-sign Buchnevich. Per Armstrong they'd love to extend him, but want him to understand that the next two years the plan is currently not to buy and go all in to compete. I'm not sure if this is just him saying he did his due diligence. But Armstrong usually doesn't say too much so it's certainly on the fryer in terms of being towards the top of their priorities.

The other thing that may throw a wrench in things is that Buch does have a 12 team NTC. Hard to tell where he'd want to go, but by all accounts this seems like a pretty harmonious relationship between him and the Blues. It's just a matter of this is a very good player who can help a team win, on a team that really isn't positioned to win while he signs in his prime. I think they're also likely to offer him a shorter term deal than an 8 year extension, which probably isn't in line with Buch's wants.

If you're bored and want a better understanding of the situation. The Blues Youtube has the press release of Steen being named GM to be in which they did a post presser interview after that I'm pretty sure they touched on the topic
CanucksJhett liked this.
Jun. 28 at 12:50 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2024
Posts: 29
Likes: 6
Quoting: AC14
I think the consensus right now is that it's about 75/25 Blues re-sign Buchnevich. Per Armstrong they'd love to extend him, but want him to understand that the next two years the plan is currently not to buy and go all in to compete. I'm not sure if this is just him saying he did his due diligence. But Armstrong usually doesn't say too much so it's certainly on the fryer in terms of being towards the top of their priorities.

The other thing that may throw a wrench in things is that Buch does have a 12 team NTC. Hard to tell where he'd want to go, but by all accounts this seems like a pretty harmonious relationship between him and the Blues. It's just a matter of this is a very good player who can help a team win, on a team that really isn't positioned to win while he signs in his prime. I think they're also likely to offer him a shorter term deal than an 8 year extension, which probably isn't in line with Buch's wants.

If you're bored and want a better understanding of the situation. The Blues Youtube has the press release of Steen being named GM to be in which they did a post presser interview after that I'm pretty sure they touched on the topic


Awesome! If I get the chance I'll check it out. Thank you!
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll