SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Help for Bedard

Created by: suora
Team: 2024-25 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 26, 2024
Published: Jun. 26, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$7,800,000
4$6,200,000
2$3,000,000
2$3,000,000
Trades
PHI
    Future Con.
    Buyouts
    Retained Salary Transactions
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2024
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the NYI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the NYI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the OTT
    Logo of the CGY
    Logo of the CHI
    2025
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the DAL
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    2026
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the NYI
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the OTT
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    21$88,000,000$82,810,000$0$6,250,000$5,190,000
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    $7,800,000$7,800,000
    LW, C
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,500,000$4M)
    C
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $2,250,000$2,250,000
    LW, C, RW
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $6,000,000$6,000,000
    LW
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
    $7,750,000$7,750,000
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    $6,200,000$6,200,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $4,250,000$4,250,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $4,250,000$4,250,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$900,000$900K)
    RW, C
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $1,200,000$1,200,000
    LW, C
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    LW, C, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $4,500,000$4,500,000
    LW, C, RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $912,500$912,500 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    LW
    RFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $918,333$918,333 (Performance Bonus$1,000,000$1M)
    LD
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $9,500,000$9,500,000
    RD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $4,250,000$4,250,000
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $4,600,000$4,600,000
    LD
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $4,400,000$4,400,000
    RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $962,500$962,500
    G
    RFA - 1
    $3,000,000$3,000,000
    LD
    UFA - 1
    $3,000,000$3,000,000
    RD
    UFA - 3

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Jun. 26 at 8:19 a.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2018
    Posts: 6,698
    Likes: 2,362
    Considering he was out two yrs, and most thought he'd never play again, for him to come back and play 74 games and get 38 pts, (on one of the worst offenses in the league) and not be bothered by injury, hes sunk so low to be worth FC?

    And while hes 31 yrs old and signed for 6 yrs, (he has had 2 yrs off which helps the mileage on his body), if he goes LTIR, it doesn;t hurt against cap in the future, and while he might not get back to 70 pts, he looks certainly able to be a 45-55 pt guy in a growing cap after getting back to game shape/speed, so I dont think hes worth tons, but hes worth alot more than FC.
    Ujeje liked this.
    Jun. 26 at 8:22 a.m.
    #2
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2023
    Posts: 658
    Likes: 311
    I don't see Flyers doing this, Coots is the captain, had strong start for the season but ran out of gas after missing 2 seasons before this. Will be reliable but overpaid bottom 6 center in the future.
    Jun. 26 at 8:43 a.m.
    #3
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2024
    Posts: 170
    Likes: 233
    Hawks decline. $46 million left on his contract is way too much for a 31 year old who hasn’t lived up to his contract in four years.
    Jun. 26 at 8:48 a.m.
    #4
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2024
    Posts: 170
    Likes: 233
    Quoting: Hammerwise
    Considering he was out two yrs, and most thought he'd never play again, for him to come back and play 74 games and get 38 pts, (on one of the worst offenses in the league) and not be bothered by injury, hes sunk so low to be worth FC?

    And while hes 31 yrs old and signed for 6 yrs, (he has had 2 yrs off which helps the mileage on his body), if he goes LTIR, it doesn;t hurt against cap in the future, and while he might not get back to 70 pts, he looks certainly able to be a 45-55 pt guy in a growing cap after getting back to game shape/speed, so I dont think hes worth tons, but hes worth alot more than FC.


    There are six years left on his deal. The CBA expires in two years, and the NHL has expressed interest in closing the LTIR loophole. There’s no guarantee that a team could stash him on LTOR for the current cap benefits by the end of his deal. And even if he becomes a 55 point a year guy again, $7.75 million for six more years is a significant overpay. This contract is a cap dump, and a fairly significant one.
    Hawksguy81 and Bedsy_Burner liked this.
    Jun. 26 at 8:55 a.m.
    #5
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2022
    Posts: 10,052
    Likes: 12,669
    Hawks won't target Gryz as a UFA. Hopefully not Myers either. And there is zero chance the Hawks take on Coots and that contract.
    Bedsy_Burner and PaulKorea liked this.
    Jun. 26 at 9:03 a.m.
    #6
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2023
    Posts: 658
    Likes: 311
    Quoting: EmailTruck
    Hawks decline. $46 million left on his contract is way too much for a 31 year old who hasn’t lived up to his contract in four years.


    That's a strong statement as that contract has been running for 2 years and before that he was like most underpaid player in the league (4,3M for ppg selke winner). That contract was also considered as one of the better ones when signed, but no one can predict injuries.

    https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/2792190/2021/08/26/why-the-flyers-had-to-commit-to-sean-couturier-breaking-down-the-8-year-62-million-extension/

    Yes CBA is expiring and if it goes as before that there's going to be some major changes, they probably also grant teams 1-2 compliance buyouts that doesn't harm the cap space (like we have Bryzgalov).
    Hammerwise liked this.
    Jun. 26 at 9:17 a.m.
    #7
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2018
    Posts: 6,698
    Likes: 2,362
    FC is funny. Wonder if OTT will take FC for Joshua Norris?

    If hes such a bad investment, why would you want him?

    Fact is, after 2 yrs out, he played 74 games and put up 38 pts on a bad team, yes its too long, yes its too much AT THIS POINT, but FC is an insult.
    cbrier5393 liked this.
    Jun. 26 at 9:26 a.m.
    #8
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2020
    Posts: 76
    Likes: 43
    Quoting: EmailTruck
    There are six years left on his deal. The CBA expires in two years, and the NHL has expressed interest in closing the LTIR loophole. There’s no guarantee that a team could stash him on LTOR for the current cap benefits by the end of his deal. And even if he becomes a 55 point a year guy again, $7.75 million for six more years is a significant overpay. This contract is a cap dump, and a fairly significant one.


    I have to imagine contracts signed before the rule change will be grandfathered in, so I doubt this applies.
    Hammerwise liked this.
    Jun. 26 at 9:33 a.m.
    #9
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2024
    Posts: 170
    Likes: 233
    Quoting: Ujeje
    That's a strong statement as that contract has been running for 2 years and before that he was like most underpaid player in the league (4,3M for ppg selke winner). That contract was also considered as one of the better ones when signed, but no one can predict injuries.

    https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/2792190/2021/08/26/why-the-flyers-had-to-commit-to-sean-couturier-breaking-down-the-8-year-62-million-extension/

    Yes CBA is expiring and if it goes as before that there's going to be some major changes, they probably also grant teams 1-2 compliance buyouts that doesn't harm the cap space (like we have Bryzgalov).


    Okay, I should have been more precise. The 2019-2020 season, when he was 27, is the last time he lived up to a $7.75 million per year contract, which is the contract that he currently has. Injuries are unfortunate and unpredictable, but we know about them now, and even if you attribute his decline entirely to injuries it’s unlikely he’ll regain his form of four years ago. He’s a cap dump.

    And as for LTIR, they “probably” will grant some form of buyout. That means the Hawks still take on risk at the end of the deal, when our contention window has opened.
    Jun. 26 at 9:33 a.m.
    #10
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2024
    Posts: 170
    Likes: 233
    Comment posted three times due to bad internet— my apologies all.
    Jun. 26 at 9:33 a.m.
    #11
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2024
    Posts: 170
    Likes: 233
    ..
    Jun. 26 at 10:08 a.m.
    #12
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2023
    Posts: 658
    Likes: 311
    Quoting: EmailTruck
    Okay, I should have been more precise. The 2019-2020 season, when he was 27, is the last time he lived up to a $7.75 million per year contract, which is the contract that he currently has. Injuries are unfortunate and unpredictable, but we know about them now, and even if you attribute his decline entirely to injuries it’s unlikely he’ll regain his form of four years ago. He’s a cap dump.

    And as for LTIR, they “probably” will grant some form of buyout. That means the Hawks still take on risk at the end of the deal, when our contention window has opened.


    His season wasn't that bad tbh, just ran out of gas like mentioned because he was playing 19-22mins/game after missing 2 full seasons before that. He netted 30 points in first 41 games and 8 in last 33 games. He also had 59,2 CF% and 6,3 shot% so could say he was either rusty or just unlucky. According to Dom Luszczyszyn and his player cards, Coots market value performance was worth 5,6M still.

    I'm 100% sure he'll be even better next year with one full season behind and full pre-season ahead. This might be just the fanboy in me writing (always been my favorite in Flyers since he arrived to NHL) and ofc his contract may become a problem in the future, but I'm sure they ain't considering dumping him now.
    Jun. 26 at 10:30 a.m.
    #13
    uWu Garak
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2024
    Posts: 920
    Likes: 1,301
    Quoting: Hammerwise
    Considering he was out two yrs, and most thought he'd never play again, for him to come back and play 74 games and get 38 pts, (on one of the worst offenses in the league) and not be bothered by injury, hes sunk so low to be worth FC?

    And while hes 31 yrs old and signed for 6 yrs, (he has had 2 yrs off which helps the mileage on his body), if he goes LTIR, it doesn;t hurt against cap in the future, and while he might not get back to 70 pts, he looks certainly able to be a 45-55 pt guy in a growing cap after getting back to game shape/speed, so I dont think hes worth tons, but hes worth alot more than FC.


    No. He isn't. CHI isn't taking on an in decline, injury prone, 31 year old, with 6 years $7.75M left on his contract. I would sooner give that money and term to Lindholm than take on Couturier's contract for nothing, let alone pay for it. It is even worse if he is on and off LTIR constantly, because we wouldn't be able to use that space in case he is cleared for contact... Unless he decides to LTIRetire. And if we are talking about that as a possibility for a player... What does that tell you about the player? No one is paying anything for him. PHI likely either needs to hang onto him themselves, or pay to move him. If they can get anything for him, it will be very minimal and probably require retention.
    PaulKorea and Hawksguy81 liked this.
    Jun. 26 at 10:33 a.m.
    #14
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2023
    Posts: 1,821
    Likes: 3,093
    Easy decline for Chicago. They aren't taking $40m worth of damaged goods.
    Hawksguy81 and Bedsy_Burner liked this.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll