SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/NHL

Possible Expansion Cities

Jul. 23, 2017 at 11:39 p.m.
#1
Still a Leafs Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2015
Posts: 5,555
Likes: 661
Seattle
quebec
Milwaukee
Indianapolis
Houston
Baltimore
Jul. 23, 2017 at 11:39 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 7,711
Likes: 2,820
Quoting: Rodzikhockey93
Seattle
quebec
Milwaukee
Indianapolis
Houston
Baltimore


Hamilton if Toronto would allow it which I doubt
Jul. 24, 2017 at 7:53 p.m.
#3
Black Lives Matter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 29,923
Likes: 4,651
Quebec for sure i think
plNHL liked this.
Jul. 24, 2017 at 8:01 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 373
Likes: 88
Quoting: Rodzikhockey93
Seattle
quebec
Milwaukee
Indianapolis
Houston
Baltimore


Not to burst a bunch of bubbles, but
1. Milwaukee already has an AHL franchise, and while that doesn't immediately eliminate it, there are other, larger markets to expand to.
2. Indianapolis does not have an arena or any desire to support an NHL team. While a growing city, they also aren't a large market
3. Baltimore has too much proximity to Washington and Philadelphia to be a solid choice. There are better options.

Seattle, Houston, and Toronto (2) would be my top three, with Quebec being an Eastern conference relocation threat.
Jul. 24, 2017 at 8:02 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 134
Likes: 10
Houston is more of a relocation city than an expansion one. You would need a strong team to build a fan base.
Jul. 24, 2017 at 8:03 p.m.
#6
Black Lives Matter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 29,923
Likes: 4,651
Quoting: tadhockey
Quoting: Rodzikhockey93
Seattle
quebec
Milwaukee
Indianapolis
Houston
Baltimore


Not to burst a bunch of bubbles, but
1. Milwaukee already has an AHL franchise, and while that doesn't immediately eliminate it, there are other, larger markets to expand to.
2. Indianapolis does not have an arena or any desire to support an NHL team. While a growing city, they also aren't a large market
3. Baltimore has too much proximity to Washington and Philadelphia to be a solid choice. There are better options.

Seattle, Houston, and Toronto (2) would be my top three, with Quebec being an Eastern conference relocation threat.


Arizona could move to Quebec. Not sure who would move there in the east. Isles? Panthers?
Jul. 24, 2017 at 8:04 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 373
Likes: 88
Quoting: ChiaPetty
Houston is more of a relocation city than an expansion one. You would need a strong team to build a fan base.


Fair point, but why would Vegas be any different? If it ends up working there, then it proves expansion is viable in the sun belt (if Nashville and Tampa hadn't already).
Jul. 24, 2017 at 8:07 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 373
Likes: 88
Quoting: rangersandislesfan
Quoting: tadhockey


Not to burst a bunch of bubbles, but
1. Milwaukee already has an AHL franchise, and while that doesn't immediately eliminate it, there are other, larger markets to expand to.
2. Indianapolis does not have an arena or any desire to support an NHL team. While a growing city, they also aren't a large market
3. Baltimore has too much proximity to Washington and Philadelphia to be a solid choice. There are better options.

Seattle, Houston, and Toronto (2) would be my top three, with Quebec being an Eastern conference relocation threat.


Arizona could move to Quebec. Not sure who would move there in the east. Isles? Panthers?


Arizona COULD move to Quebec, but the stark EC/WC imbalance would likely nix that from a BOG perspective. NY Islanders and Florida feel much more likely to move up there, while I suspect that if Houston becomes an option and Arizona still doesn't have an arena, that's where they'll go.
Jul. 24, 2017 at 8:19 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Still a Leafs Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2015
Posts: 5,555
Likes: 661
Zona--> Seattle Sockeyes
Florida-->Quebec Nordiques
Add: Houston Comets
Add: Markam Waxers
NYI--> Milwaukee Cruisers
Jul. 24, 2017 at 8:42 p.m.
#10
Sensible Commentary
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 910
Likes: 536
Quoting: tadhockey
Quoting: rangersandislesfan


Arizona could move to Quebec. Not sure who would move there in the east. Isles? Panthers?


Arizona COULD move to Quebec, but the stark EC/WC imbalance would likely nix that from a BOG perspective. NY Islanders and Florida feel much more likely to move up there, while I suspect that if Houston becomes an option and Arizona still doesn't have an arena, that's where they'll go.
For the last time, nobody's relocating to Québec City. The Nordiques left because the Canadian dollar was weak, and the Canadian dollar is still weak, so why would any franchise relocate back to Québec City?
And I really doubt the Coyotes are leaving. It's pretty hard to justify leaving a market that just produced a generational talent.

I wouldn't be surprised if Houston became the 32nd franchise, just because of geographic concerns (and also media market size), and because nobody seems to be getting anywhere in Seattle with regards to a real arena proposal.
Jul. 24, 2017 at 8:44 p.m.
#11
Black Lives Matter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 29,923
Likes: 4,651
Quoting: Rodzikhockey93
Zona--> Seattle Sockeyes
Florida-->Quebec Nordiques
Add: Houston Comets
Add: Markam Waxers
NYI--> Milwaukee Cruisers


as much as i don't like it when teams move, the one i wouldn't mind would be Arizona to Quebec. I hope nobody moves unless it's Arizona to Quebec, that would be okay.
Jul. 25, 2017 at 12:46 p.m.
#12
HockeySen
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 188
Likes: 24
I like the thought of Kansas/Oklahoma City. Fits right in the Central division.
Jul. 27, 2017 at 4:06 a.m.
#13
elekesb
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 13
Likes: 1
Expansion cities should be Houston or Quebec. Maybe Portland (oregon). But what do you think how many could be the maximum number of the teams in the league?
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll