SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Markstrom staying put

Created by: glaive
Team: 2023-24 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 29, 2024
Published: Feb. 29, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
"We want to send a message to the rest of the team"

"...just ignore that we traded 3 core players away.."
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CGY
2025
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2026
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$78,064,166$0$212,500$5,435,834
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$10,500,000$10,500,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,800,000$5,800,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$863,333$863,333
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,300,000$1,300,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,100,000$3,100,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$775,000$775,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$825,000$825,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,300,000$2,300,000
LW, RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$775,000$775,000
RW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,250,000$6,250,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,550,000$4,550,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,237,500$1,237,500
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$775,000$775,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,200,000$2,200,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$925,000$925,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$762,500
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$762,500
RW, LW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 29 at 5:25 p.m.
#1
Shaners79
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 641
Likes: 187
Yeah, I don't get it
glaive liked this.
Feb. 29 at 5:26 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2021
Posts: 1,563
Likes: 695
Quoting: Shaners79
Yeah, I don't get it


I get the whole sentiment of wanting to remain competitive, but maybe don't backtrack after selling 3 big pieces away? Just a weird move
Feb. 29 at 5:28 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 4,235
Likes: 1,334
You put Wolf behind Markstrom, it likely helps with Wolf’s development. How much did NJ want retained?
Feb. 29 at 5:29 p.m.
#4
Shaners79
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 641
Likes: 187
Quoting: Celtics21
You put Wolf behind Markstrom, it likely helps with Wolf’s development. How much did NJ want retained?


No idea but I think a million would be decent.
Feb. 29 at 5:29 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 41,420
Likes: 18,819
There was one buyer.
A monopsony.
CGY didn’t have price-setting power
No leverage.

And since that single buyer was trying to buy Hanifin and Markstrom as package, Conroy had to decouple them so he didn’t drag down his Hanifin return.
dgibb10 liked this.
Feb. 29 at 5:31 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 41,420
Likes: 18,819
Quoting: Celtics21
You put Wolf behind Markstrom, it likely helps with Wolf’s development. How much did NJ want retained?


“2-3 million” was the latest
Feb. 29 at 5:33 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2021
Posts: 1,563
Likes: 695
Quoting: NHLfan10506
There was one buyer.
A monopsony.
CGY didn’t have price-setting power
No leverage.

And since that single buyer was trying to buy Hanifin and Markstrom as package, Conroy had to decouple them so he didn’t drag down his Hanifin return.


I'd bite the bullet and retain on Markstrom and take the young scoring winger with a pretty decent upside over not making the playoffs and risking Markstrom falling off because he's old.

The team will probably be retooling the next few seasons anyway, the retention slot isn't a big deal.
Feb. 29 at 5:35 p.m.
#8
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 12,667
Likes: 3,376
Quoting: glaive
I'd bite the bullet and retain on Markstrom and take the young scoring winger with a pretty decent upside over not making the playoffs and risking Markstrom falling off because he's old.

The team will probably be retooling the next few seasons anyway, the retention slot isn't a big deal.


Who knows, maybe Conroy saw what flames fans were convinced they'd get.

Would flames fans be more pissed expecting 1st+Holtz+Casey and getting no trade or expecting that and getting Holtz for a 2 mill retained Markstrom.
Feb. 29 at 5:37 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2021
Posts: 1,563
Likes: 695
Quoting: dgibb10
Who knows, maybe Conroy saw what flames fans were convinced they'd get.

Would flames fans be more pissed expecting 1st+Holtz+Casey and getting no trade or expecting that and getting Holtz for a 2 mill retained Markstrom.


I'd imagine there might have been more pieces involved that we probably don't know about. Maybe another mid-ish round pick for retention.

Conroy shouldn't worry about fan service and do what's right for the team. If Markstrom gets a 1st+ this offseason, I'll admit I'm wrong. But until then, I think it was a pretty crappy decision.
Feb. 29 at 5:39 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 41,420
Likes: 18,819
Quoting: glaive
I'd bite the bullet and retain on Markstrom and take the young scoring winger with a pretty decent upside over not making the playoffs and risking Markstrom falling off because he's old.

The team will probably be retooling the next few seasons anyway, the retention slot isn't a big deal.


There must be another side to it…if he wanted to sell Markstrom as standalone piece a couple of weeks ago, and got his asking price from NJD, only reason I can think it didn’t happen was buyer wanted another piece involved. Especially since the original story of owners nixing retention seems to have been debunked.
dgibb10 liked this.
Feb. 29 at 5:40 p.m.
#11
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 12,667
Likes: 3,376
Quoting: glaive
I'd imagine there might have been more pieces involved that we probably don't know about. Maybe another mid-ish round pick for retention.

Conroy shouldn't worry about fan service and do what's right for the team. If Markstrom gets a 1st+ this offseason, I'll admit I'm wrong. But until then, I think it was a pretty crappy decision.


I expect NJD wanted Hanifin as well.
Feb. 29 at 5:49 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 4,235
Likes: 1,334
Quoting: NHLfan10506
There must be another side to it…if he wanted to sell Markstrom as standalone piece a couple of weeks ago, and got his asking price from NJD, only reason I can think it didn’t happen was buyer wanted another piece involved. Especially since the original story of owners nixing retention seems to have been debunked.


I can also think of another reason. Markstrom decided against NJ with his NMC. Lots of reasons to pass when you consider non hockey related reasons
Feb. 29 at 5:49 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2021
Posts: 1,563
Likes: 695
Quoting: Celtics21
I can also think of another reason. Markstrom decided against NJ with his NMC. Lots of reasons to pass when you consider non hockey related reasons


Apparently he had no problem waiving it
Feb. 29 at 7:36 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 4,235
Likes: 1,334
Quoting: glaive
Apparently he had no problem waiving it


The one thing that is true about this time of season is opinions change when things get closer
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll