Why are you sending so many pics to the ducks. Also there is no way Alzner signs for that little of money same with Hyman. I bieleve Hyman and Browns contacts will be similar

Like the Alzner signing. But bad trades, too much to Anaheim, and remember Matthews, Nylander, and Marner need new contracts soon, we don't have the cap space to take Landeskog.

Trust me, Leafs would find the cap space if they could pry Landeskog! The Anaheim deal wore me out, after the 3 players you want to move! Taking on the Bieksa contract should be enough to get Montour . . . . .Anaheim doesn't have any interest in Carrick so take him out of the deal and rescind all draft picks! Or just go with Kapanen, Leipsic and perhaps a 2nd! Done!!!

Don't know why the Leafs would trade so much for Landeskog who at 5,5m has Komarov numbers. Just don't know why folks think he's Pacioritty or Marchand or Drouin at LW. Admitting you didn't give up that much for him.
That's a way overpayment for Montour. First Bieska isn't waiving for the Leafs. And trading Carrick, we lose a RHD just obtain another in Montour (admitting Montour has more upside). This giving picks to Vegas so they don't take a Marlie is being beyond belief (in many posts, not just yours)
And after all that, the Leafs defence still has Marincin and 21 year old who is going to play with Marlies. Gauthier is injured, so maybe the Leafs need Fehr. I hope the Leafs get lucky with lottery balls next April.

Pal, take an honest look at Landeskog numbers, and tell me at 6.1 and 215, with grit that he isn't a 60-70 point scorer on Matthiews wing? AND HE'S ONLY 24! At $5.5 he's a steal! He quickly becomes a "core piece"!

Doug: I'm 6.2. and 220 and I'm not getting 60-70 points with Matthews. I admit he could improve as Leaf. But gee he plays top minutes with the Avs with the and still has declining numbers in the past three years.. 33 points in 72 games last year. I guess good GMs in real life and CapFriendly make projections for the future.....and in effect buy low. For instance my two ex wives must have saw something in me at one time, but I guess their future projections were unfounded Doug, in four years we can have a more objective view of Landeskog and what his trade value should have been June 3 2017.
PS. enjoy your posts and comments.

Okay, maybe Landeskog is possible. But that ensures that van Riemsdyk and Bozak both go.

Yeah you're right. . . over the 4 years let's forget the 300 points. . . .2 cups,. . . . and enjoy Hyman and his 25 points/year! But no worries. . . .he likely won't cost you $2 Million in any year! No emoticons. . . .i'm less than emotional! ALL GOOD PAL!!!!!!

Doug, hope you're right. But Hyman and his 28 points were only 5 less than this alleged star Landeskog. And Hyman did not see PP time. Kadri played a lot of PP time as Mattews LWer. So it really isn't fair to say Hyman scored 28 points playing full time with Matthews and by miracle Landys will score 75 Well he might if he takes time away from Kadri LW on the PP and Nylander. Nylander also had LW time with Matthews when Marner was on RW.. And I'm sure Landy so lots of # 1 line time including PP with Duchene and MacKinnon. Again it's projection. If Landeskog hadn't been a near # 1 overall pick and the youngest captain in NHL history, he certainly wouldn't be getting all this love on this site. Not denying people can have different views on his upside.

Please tell me Pal. . . . You would hate to see him as a Montreal Canadien!