Not even close on DeBrincat.

And I don't see why the Ducks would do that.

Please explain why you think the Hawks would give up their future superstar goal-scorer for some scraps and a very late first.

Seattle and Edmonton might accept. The rest brusquely decline.

A #1 right handed defenseman is scrape’s? Bjork is a guy you were trying to get last year at the trade deadline and Bryson is a good,solid, young defenseman and a late first round pick is not nothing like you make it out to be. I may need to chang things up a little but this is pretty close. Also you are rebuilding. WhT would it cost in your eyes to get Debrincat

Why would the ducks do that? Well they don’t want comtois, bothe players could use a change of scenery and Olofsson is way outperformed comtois this season.

So a rebuilding team doesn't want a kid who just turned 24 years old who's a top 5 goal scorer in the league? Dude, you are so far off in value here it's laughable. It would take the equivalent of at least 3 top 1st round picks or top 15 drafted prospects to pry Debrincat...this isn't close.

Jokiharju is not a 1D, he's a good second pairing D, but not #1. Bryson is good, admitably, so I will say that I was wrong there, but he's 24 and doesn't look to have that much upside anymore. Bjork is a dump. If we trade DeBrincat (a top 50 player in the league AND top 10 goal-scorer at age 24), we're going to be looking purely for futures. That includes YOUR 1st, at least one of Cozens, Peterka, or Quinn, and more.

They don't want Comtois? News to me

Lol, where’d you hear that from?