SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Jets POV of trading a RW

Created by: MTLaveragefan
Team: 2022-23 Winnipeg Jets
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 16, 2021
Published: Nov. 16, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$850,000
2$850,000
2$850,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$3,640,000
Trades
WPG
  1. Anderson, Josh
  2. Dvorak, Christian
  3. 2022 1st round pick (CAR)
MTL
  1. Dubois, Pierre-Luc [RFA Rights]
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
2023
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
2024
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$82,500,000$81,457,024$0$1,062,500$1,042,976
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$7,142,857$7,142,857
LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$6,125,000$6,125,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$8,250,000$8,250,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,450,000$4,450,000
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$3,640,000$3,640,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$850,000$850,000
LW, RW
RFA
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$850,000$850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$3,250,000$3,250,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$750,000$750,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$6,250,000$6,250,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$5,875,000$5,875,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$6,166,667$6,166,667
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$5,950,000$5,950,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$3,900,000$3,900,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$850,000$850,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$900,000$900,000
LD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$5,291,667$5,291,667
C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Nov. 16, 2021 at 12:37 p.m.
#1
Cold spaghetti
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 4,917
Likes: 2,134
No way lol
tsyls liked this.
Nov. 16, 2021 at 12:38 p.m.
#2
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 60,251
Likes: 23,113
For immediate on ice value, you would think the Jets are better with Dubois instead of 9.9m in Dvorak and Andersen
bunzy1034, Pasta88bruins, Rooney and 2 others liked this.
Nov. 16, 2021 at 12:46 p.m.
#3
TrueNorth
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 3,075
Likes: 682
If Copp was willing to sign that deal, Jets nation would rejoice.
bunzy1034 and MTLaveragefan liked this.
Nov. 16, 2021 at 1:10 p.m.
#4
Bandwagon fairweathe
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,763
Likes: 3,333
Much rather just have harkins/svech/vaselainen replace copp, and get something done longterm with dubois than any of this, damn that dumb Wheeler deal.
Nov. 16, 2021 at 1:14 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 16,198
Likes: 7,206
If only Copp would sign for that. As far as the trade goes, Montreal unfortunately doesn't have a single asset to open up the conversation for Dubois with, if the Jets ever thought of trading him.
Nov. 16, 2021 at 1:17 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 15,665
Likes: 6,513
This is hilarious cause just a couple of months age Jets fans were saying nothing less than Suzuki or Caufield + for Dubios, see Windjammer comment.
Nov. 16, 2021 at 1:26 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 1,298
Likes: 823
That second line would be soooooooooooooooooooooooo bad
Nov. 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 16,198
Likes: 7,206
Quoting: Campabee
This is hilarious cause just a couple of months age Jets fans were saying nothing less than Suzuki or Caufield + for Dubios, see Windjammer comment.


Exactly, now the value of both has dropped. Suzuki has a bad contract now and Caufield was never an option. Caufield is a small, vastly inferior version of Laine. Why would the Jets go backwards?
Nov. 16, 2021 at 1:36 p.m.
#9
Cold spaghetti
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 4,917
Likes: 2,134
Quoting: Campabee
This is hilarious cause just a couple of months age Jets fans were saying nothing less than Suzuki or Caufield + for Dubios, see Windjammer comment.


I mean this trade is horrible lol. Anderson is bad, Dvorak is meh, and that is going to be like a mid 20's pick. PLD is arguably the best player on the team right now
Nov. 16, 2021 at 1:40 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 430
Likes: 96
Quoting: bunzy1034
I mean this trade is horrible lol. Anderson is bad, Dvorak is meh, and that is going to be like a mid 20's pick. PLD is arguably the best player on the team right now


doesn't montreal keep the better of the two picks this draft? Does that not make this pick probably a lottery pick the way they are going.

I like Dubois but i would not trade the shot at wright for Dubois straight up even, let alone adding dvorak and anderson
Campabee liked this.
Nov. 16, 2021 at 1:43 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 15,665
Likes: 6,513
Quoting: Windjammer
Exactly, now the value of both has dropped. Suzuki has a bad contract now and Caufield was never an option. Caufield is a small, vastly inferior version of Laine. Why would the Jets go backwards?


You are nuts, Suzuki's contract is not bad it is actually really good for a 1st line center and on what planet is a scoring winger not an option?! I will agree that Caufield is smaller than Laine but he works harder, is better defensively and is not JUST a shooter. He is actually a smaller player but a HUGE upgrade on Laine as he plays a 200 foot game and isn't just a one trick pony. His hockey IQ is also way higher than Laine's you see this in his decisions with the puck and without it. He doesn't only find the soft spots in coverage but also manipulates opposing defenses to open up passing options as well. You can have 100 Laine's and they wouldn't makeup the difference in hockey IQ with a single Caufield.
Nov. 16, 2021 at 1:45 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 15,665
Likes: 6,513
Quoting: bunzy1034
I mean this trade is horrible lol. Anderson is bad, Dvorak is meh, and that is going to be like a mid 20's pick. PLD is arguably the best player on the team right now


Montreal is not going to make the playoffs in 2021-22 even IF we got Dubois, that means at worse our pick would be 16th not in the 20's. The trade itself is bad as long as that 1st is outside the top 15 but since the pick would be in the top 15 and more likely in the top 10 Montreal wouldn't take that trade.
Nov. 16, 2021 at 1:47 p.m.
#13
Cold spaghetti
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 4,917
Likes: 2,134
Quoting: Campabee
Montreal is not going to make the playoffs in 2021-22 even IF we got Dubois, that means at worse our pick would be 16th not in the 20's.


Ok my bad I saw it was Car so I assumed it is going to be like mid 20's
Nov. 16, 2021 at 1:54 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 16,198
Likes: 7,206
Edited Nov. 16, 2021 at 2:04 p.m.
Quoting: Campabee
You are nuts, Suzuki's contract is not bad it is actually really good for a 1st line center and on what planet is a scoring winger not an option?! I will agree that Caufield is smaller than Laine but he works harder, is better defensively and is not JUST a shooter. He is actually a smaller player but a HUGE upgrade on Laine as he plays a 200 foot game and isn't just a one trick pony. His hockey IQ is also way higher than Laine's you see this in his decisions with the puck and without it. He doesn't only find the soft spots in coverage but also manipulates opposing defenses to open up passing options as well. You can have 100 Laine's and they wouldn't makeup the difference in hockey IQ with a single Caufield.


That is a hilarious post. Trying to compare Caufield to Laine. At 18 Laine was scoring 36 goals in the NHL. At 20 Caufield has a career total of 4 goals, and can't crack one of the worst offensive cores in the NHL. You also can't compare them defensively. Laine wasn't good, but did put in an effort. Caufield is abysmal. He has absolutely no clue of what to do on his side of center ice. Until Caufield actually scores regularly, he's not a scoring winger.

The main point on Caufield though is that the Jets gave up an infinitely better, much more proven winger in Laine to get Dubois. Why would they turn around and trade Dubois for the mini-me version of Laine now? They would have just kept Laine.
Nov. 16, 2021 at 2:06 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 15,665
Likes: 6,513
Quoting: Windjammer
That is a hilarious post. Trying to compare Caufield to Laine. At 18 Laine was scoring 36 goals in the NHL. At 20 Caufield has a career total of 4 goals, and can't crack one of the worst offensive cores in the NHL. You also can't compare them defensively. Laine wasn't good, but did put in an effort. Caufield is abysmal. He has absolutely no clue of what to do on his side of center ice. Until Caufield actually scores regularly, he's not a scoring winger.

The main point on Caufield though is that the Jets gave up an infinitely better, much more proven winger in Laine to get Dubois. Why would they turn around and trade Dubois for the mini-me version of Laine now. They would have just kept Laine.


With regards to Caufield not being in the lineup, the coaches in Montreal are morons, although I wouldn't want Caufield in Montreal right now anyway because of how bad the team is doing. No sense in ruining a kid by playing him in a losing environment. Also 4 goals in 10 NHL games is a great pace for the kid, this year whatever can go wrong has gone wrong for the Habs. Even you as a Hab hater have to admit that the Habs are no where near as bad as their record indicates. The D is bad and the center position is weak but we really should be competing for a WC spot not a lottery pick and NO ONE on the planet would have guessed that Montreal would have only 4 wins through 15 games.
Nov. 16, 2021 at 2:18 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 16,198
Likes: 7,206
Quoting: Campabee
With regards to Caufield not being in the lineup, the coaches in Montreal are morons, although I wouldn't want Caufield in Montreal right now anyway because of how bad the team is doing. No sense in ruining a kid by playing him in a losing environment. Also 4 goals in 10 NHL games is a great pace for the kid, this year whatever can go wrong has gone wrong for the Habs. Even you as a Hab hater have to admit that the Habs are no where near as bad as their record indicates. The D is bad and the center position is weak but we really should be competing for a WC spot not a lottery pick and NO ONE on the planet would have guessed that Montreal would have only 4 wins through 15 games.


Not liking poor value trades that don't give Winnipeg anything they need doesn't make me a Hab hater. It just means I don't think the Jets will accept a trade, if they even trade Dubois, that doesn't help make the Jets better when they are trading a young, core piece.
Nov. 16, 2021 at 2:29 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 15,665
Likes: 6,513
Quoting: Windjammer
Not liking poor value trades that don't give Winnipeg anything they need doesn't make me a Hab hater. It just means I don't think the Jets will accept a trade, if they even trade Dubois, that doesn't help make the Jets better when they are trading a young, core piece.


No, I actually agree with you here that the Above trade doesn't make sense either does trading for caufield since the weakness on the Jets isn't on the wing. What makes you a Habs hater is the way you ALWAYS run down Habs players. Just look at your comment above about Suzuki being on a bad contract, a PPG top line center signed at 6.75 Mil for 8 years makes it a bad contract?! How many other teams 1C is paid 6.75 mil or less?
Nov. 16, 2021 at 2:48 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 16,198
Likes: 7,206
Quoting: Campabee
No, I actually agree with you here that the Above trade doesn't make sense either does trading for caufield since the weakness on the Jets isn't on the wing. What makes you a Habs hater is the way you ALWAYS run down Habs players. Just look at your comment above about Suzuki being on a bad contract, a PPG top line center signed at 6.75 Mil for 8 years makes it a bad contract?! How many other teams 1C is paid 6.75 mil or less?


I like how you massage the numbers there to try and make the numbers look more palatable. It's almost like to you know Suzuki's extension is an overpay.

Suzuki is on his entry level now, but after this year is being paid $7.875. Also, to be clear, Suzuki isn't now and never has been a point per game player over a season. I know you are trying to use a small sample size with a few games against Detroit where he played well to try and pump his tires, but over time, he will settle into his norm. Which IMO will be the 40-50 point range he's always played at. Could I be wrong?Possibly, but that is my opinion.

That also doesn't make me a Habs hater. I just don't see things with the bleu, blanc et rouge glasses you see things through. Remember you told us Domi was a guaranteed 70 point player worth a first plus minimum, Caufield would be challenging for rookie of the years honours with a 30 goal minimum season, etc. I just didn't and don't agree with you is all.
Nov. 16, 2021 at 3:05 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 15,665
Likes: 6,513
Quoting: Windjammer
I like how you massage the numbers there to try and make the numbers look more palatable. It's almost like to you know Suzuki's extension is an overpay.

Suzuki is on his entry level now, but after this year is being paid $7.875. Also, to be clear, Suzuki isn't now and never has been a point per game player over a season. I know you are trying to use a small sample size with a few games against Detroit where he played well to try and pump his tires, but over time, he will settle into his norm. Which IMO will be the 40-50 point range he's always played at. Could I be wrong?Possibly, but that is my opinion.

That also doesn't make me a Habs hater. I just don't see things with the bleu, blanc et rouge glasses you see things through. Remember you told us Domi was a guaranteed 70 point player worth a first plus minimum, Caufield would be challenging for rookie of the years honours with a 30 goal minimum season, etc. I just didn't and don't agree with you is all.


To be fair on Caufield I wasn't the only one who thought he would be competing for rookie of the year honors. Every pundit and analyst out there had him penciled in for winning it. As for Suzuki TBH I was being lazy and didn't check his contract numbers as I am currently working as well as posting lol, that is my bad. Also on Suzuki, projections at worst AR for him to hit between 60-70 points this year but his current rate is a ppg whether you like it or not that is the truth. You run down EVERY Habs player as much as you can every chance you can and expect no pushback from Habs fans. Well my friend I call a spade a spade and you in my book are a Habs hater.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll