SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Playoff Push - comments?

Created by: trdeJong
Team: 2016-17 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 3, 2017
Published: Mar. 3, 2017
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Any thoughts on the 3rd and 4th lines?
Buyouts
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2017
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2018
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2019
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$73,000,000$67,616,734$630,500$4,010,000$5,383,266
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$6,750,000$6,750,000
LW
UFA - 6
$6,375,000$6,375,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 7
$825,000$825,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW
UFA - 3
$3,575,000$3,575,000
C
UFA - 2
$4,300,000$4,300,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,300,000$2M)
C
UFA - 1
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
C, LW
UFA - 2
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$360,000$360K)
RW, C
UFA - 1
$950,000$950,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$3,125,000$3,125,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 4
$2,200,000$2,200,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
$612,500$612,500
C, RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$3,375,000$3,375,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 6
$5,750,000$5,750,000
RD
UFA - 5
$2,500,000$2,500,000
G
UFA - 1
$4,650,400$4,650,400
LD/RD
UFA - 4
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
UFA - 1
$1,700,000$1,700,000
G
UFA - 1
$612,500$612,500
RD
UFA - 2
$2,916,667$2,916,667
RD
UFA - 1
$5,250,000$5,250,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 3, 2017 at 11:23 a.m.
#1
Flamed
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2016
Posts: 244
Likes: 1
I had the exact same idea for the third line!
Mar. 5, 2017 at 10:51 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 642
Likes: 32
Quoting: Flamed
I had the exact same idea for the third line!


All 3 have developed into very solid 2 way players that defend very well... All 3 have skill and vision (hockey sense)... with further development the points (rewards) will follow... Could be a seriously hard line to play against that can capitalize on any errors...

If (and if) this line can jell quickly it also creates a 4th line that is more a second 2nd line... Some serious depth and very hard team to play against that can score from every angle! Could go deep in the playoffs!
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll