SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Rick Nash

Created by: budsallday
Team: 2017-18 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 13, 2018
Published: Feb. 13, 2018
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Not saying this is going to happen, but if Lou is serious about going after Nash then the only assets I would give up for him would be mid-round draft picks and mid-level prospects to obtain 1.5 years of him. I still think he is an elite level player and would be an upgrade on any player the Leafs have on the left wing. He could immediately slot in on the 1st or 2nd line, playing with either Matthews or Kadri. This also helps give you the option of trading JVR (even though Lou said he was not being traded) at the TDL to upgrade the 3rd C or 4th C position, or even upgrade the blueline, or even replace the picks you gave up for Nash. The trade options are there.

Another option would be slotting Marleau at Centre and playing with Nash and Connor Brown. This helps with Browns development and also gives you 4 really scary looking lines going into the playoffs. This also pushes Bozak down as your 4C, so the need for going after an upgrade at C at the TDL is not there anymore.
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. 2018 4th round pick (NYI)
NYI
  1. Martin, Matt ($1,000,000 retained)
2.
TOR
  1. Nash, Rick ($3,900,000 retained)
NYR
  1. Borgman, Andreas
  2. Leivo, Josh
  3. 2018 2nd round pick (TOR)
  4. 2018 3rd round pick (SJS)
  5. 2018 4th round pick (NYI)
Additional Details:
3rd & 4th picks included for retained salary on Nash
3.
CBJ
  1. Moore, Dominic
  2. Soshnikov, Nikita
Additional Details:
This trade gives Columbus the forward depth they need for the playoffs and gives Toronto depth on the blue line. There is no salary retained on Johnson unless Toronto throws in a pick, but with the term he has remaining it is best not to do that.
4.
TOR
  1. 2018 7th round pick (NJD)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2018
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the NJD
2019
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2020
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$75,000,000$69,300,476$5,370,000$4,550,000$5,699,524
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
C
UFA - 2
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW
UFA - 1
$0$0
LW, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
$6,250,000$6,250,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 3
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
$4,250,000$4,250,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C
UFA - 5
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW
UFA - 2
$2,950,000$2,950,000
RW, LW, C
UFA - 1
$4,200,000$4,200,000
C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$863,333$863,333
RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
UFA - 5
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
UFA - 7
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
$4,050,000$4,050,000
LD
UFA - 2
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$850,000$850,000
G
UFA - 2
$863,333$863,333
LD/RD
UFA - 3
$4,357,143$4,357,143
LD
UFA - 1
$750,000$750,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
$5,300,000$5,300,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 13, 2018 at 8:47 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2016
Posts: 2,933
Likes: 362
" would be an upgrade on any player the Leafs have on the left wing." I don't think you have been watching the leafs for a few years, or have been watching nash for a few years.
Feb. 13, 2018 at 8:48 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 226
Likes: 10
Quoting: clark
" would be an upgrade on any player the Leafs have on the left wing." I don't think you have been watching the leafs for a few years, or have been watching nash for a few years.


Nash is better than JVR, Komarov and Hyman
Feb. 13, 2018 at 9:20 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 1,930
Likes: 418
That's way too much to give up for Nash and this is coming from a guy that wants to see him finish his career a Leaf.
Jack Johnson is not a good hockey player, period. He doesn't help this team. If the Leafs are going to bring in a D, it has to be someone like McDonagh or it is not worth doing.

Obvious thumbs up to dumping Polak and Martin.
Feb. 13, 2018 at 9:25 a.m.
#4
#LeafsFever
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 3,795
Likes: 935
Quoting: MarioPecchia91
Nash is better than JVR, Komarov and Hyman


Present day Rick Nash is not better than JVR. He provides more scoring then Komarov or Hyman, but both of those players are quicker and more defensively-reliable so it's not a fair comparison. The trade proposed sells low on Andreas Borgman, which the Leafs would never do, and giving up so many draft picks is not what this current leafs management is all about. Rick Nash is not a Leaf UNLESS JVR is moved out first, which, at this point, I don't see happening.
Feb. 13, 2018 at 9:27 a.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 226
Likes: 10
Quoting: Goulet
That's way too much to give up for Nash and this is coming from a guy that wants to see him finish his career a Leaf.
Jack Johnson is not a good hockey player, period. He doesn't help this team. If the Leafs are going to bring in a D, it has to be someone like McDonagh or it is not worth doing.

Obvious thumbs up to dumping Polak and Martin.


Why is it too much to give up? The leafs finish around top 5 in the standings and those mid-round picks are really high. Josh Leivo will never get a real opportunity to play on this team and Borgman is the only real good asset you take a risk on losing. You need to give up something in order to get Nash as there will be a bidding war for him. With Dermott and Liljegren in our system, Toronto can use Borgman as a good trade pieces without worrying about our losing much of our defensive depth in the future.
Feb. 13, 2018 at 9:32 a.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 226
Likes: 10
Quoting: MG1986
Present day Rick Nash is not better than JVR. He provides more scoring then Komarov or Hyman, but both of those players are quicker and more defensively-reliable so it's not a fair comparison. The trade proposed sells low on Andreas Borgman, which the Leafs would never do, and giving up so many draft picks is not what this current leafs management is all about. Rick Nash is not a Leaf UNLESS JVR is moved out first, which, at this point, I don't see happening.


Present day Nash plays on a mediocre Rangers team. I would say he thrive under a speedy Babcock team where he will be used to his best abilities. We have seen transformations with players such as Kadri (who has turned into a really good defensive players) and Gardiner. The last game Nash played against Toronto he was very good. He is still a good athletic player and for 1.5 years its not a big risk. He plays a much better 200ft game than JVR and he is more of a Babcock player than JVR is.
Feb. 13, 2018 at 9:34 a.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 226
Likes: 10
Quoting: MarioPecchia91
Why is it too much to give up? The leafs finish around top 5 in the standings and those mid-round picks are really high. Josh Leivo will never get a real opportunity to play on this team and Borgman is the only real good asset you take a risk on losing. You need to give up something in order to get Nash as there will be a bidding war for him. With Dermott and Liljegren in our system, Toronto can use Borgman as a good trade pieces without worrying about our losing much of our defensive depth in the future.[/quot

Also, Jack Johnson is a real upgrade as opposed to using Polak so it is a definite upgrade on the blue line. He becomes a UFA at the end of the season so there is no risk there.
Feb. 13, 2018 at 9:44 a.m.
#8
#LeafsFever
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 3,795
Likes: 935
Quoting: MarioPecchia91
Present day Nash plays on a mediocre Rangers team. I would say he thrive under a speedy Babcock team where he will be used to his best abilities. We have seen transformations with players such as Kadri (who has turned into a really good defensive players) and Gardiner. The last game Nash played against Toronto he was very good. He is still a good athletic player and for 1.5 years its not a big risk. He plays a much better 200ft game than JVR and he is more of a Babcock player than JVR is.


Sounds to me like you are recalling a 2014-Sochi Olympian Rick Nash, not the current version of Rick Nash. While a decently good player, the Leafs should give Josh Leivo an actual chance. He doesn't cost the Leafs anything aside from a roster spot. Let the youth movement continue. Trading for Rick Nash would be contradictory to what the Leafs have been trying to do these last 3 years.
Feb. 13, 2018 at 10:06 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 46
Likes: 4
Nash is a big skilled player period. If the leafs could get him and sign him a couple years on the cheap look out. #NMN line
Feb. 13, 2018 at 10:14 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 137
Quoting: MarioPecchia91
Nash is better than JVR, Komarov and Hyman


I agree that he is better but do they really need an upgrade LW or the wingers at all? I would think a more pressing issue is Centre depth but that even isn't a desperate need
Feb. 13, 2018 at 10:21 a.m.
#11
bang bang
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 351
Quoting: MG1986
Present day Rick Nash is not better than JVR. He provides more scoring then Komarov or Hyman, but both of those players are quicker and more defensively-reliable so it's not a fair comparison. The trade proposed sells low on Andreas Borgman, which the Leafs would never do, and giving up so many draft picks is not what this current leafs management is all about. Rick Nash is not a Leaf UNLESS JVR is moved out first, which, at this point, I don't see happening.


once you said komarov is better defensively then rick Nash you went right on the ignore list
Feb. 13, 2018 at 10:34 a.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 226
Likes: 10
Quoting: PuckPal
I agree that he is better but do they really need an upgrade LW or the wingers at all? I would think a more pressing issue is Centre depth but that even isn't a desperate need


The left wing position is not a desperate need at all. I am simply giving my input on the rumors from the past 24 hours (Rick Nash saying he would waive is NTC for Toronto) I also made a point where Rick Nash on this team, without giving up any current roster players, can solve the Centre depth issue by slotting Marleau in to centre and pushing Bozak down to 4C.
Feb. 13, 2018 at 10:38 a.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 226
Likes: 10
Quoting: PuckPal
I agree that he is better but do they really need an upgrade LW or the wingers at all? I would think a more pressing issue is Centre depth but that even isn't a desperate need


Also, Nash at $3,900,000 is a very good replacement for JVR when he leaves next season. Toronto wont be able to afford JVR's asking price and then there will be a hole to fill on the left wing.
Feb. 13, 2018 at 10:41 a.m.
#14
#LeafsFever
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 3,795
Likes: 935
Quoting: buchnevichh
once you said komarov is better defensively then rick Nash you went right on the ignore list


I said "more defensively-reliable" and there are advanced stats to back up that position, if you had had a look. Don't let your team bias or the fact you happened to get up on the wrong side of the cranky bed skew your judgment on fact.
Feb. 13, 2018 at 10:41 a.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 226
Likes: 10
Quoting: MG1986
Sounds to me like you are recalling a 2014-Sochi Olympian Rick Nash, not the current version of Rick Nash. While a decently good player, the Leafs should give Josh Leivo an actual chance. He doesn't cost the Leafs anything aside from a roster spot. Let the youth movement continue. Trading for Rick Nash would be contradictory to what the Leafs have been trying to do these last 3 years.


$7,800,000 a season Rick Nash is the 2014 Sochi Olympian Rick Nash. At 3.9mil/season, this Rick Nash is a very good deal. He is still an effective player an provides very good depth. He still plays a 200ft game and can be a very effective penalty killer. He provides what Marleau provides.I do not see much risk in losing those draft picks either as Toronto has a heavy prospect pool (take a look at how well the Marlies are doing)
Feb. 13, 2018 at 10:46 a.m.
#16
#LeafsFever
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 3,795
Likes: 935
Quoting: MarioPecchia91
$7,800,000 a season Rick Nash is the 2014 Sochi Olympian Rick Nash. At 3.9mil/season, this Rick Nash is a very good deal. He is still an effective player an provides very good depth. He still plays a 200ft game and can be a very effective penalty killer. He provides what Marleau provides.I do not see much risk in losing those draft picks either as Toronto has a heavy prospect pool (take a look at how well the Marlies are doing)


Leaf fans need to keep the long-term in mind. Consider how tough it is to obtain elite-level players, let alone elite-level defenseman, Leafs should continue to draft and develop to, hopefully, find that. It costs nothing for the Leas to stay the course, but it cost them in both the long and short term to make such a trade. Fact remains that the Leafs have 2 quality in-house replacements for JVR, both of whom at least deserve a chance. I am of course referring to Josh Leivo, but more importantly, Andreas Johnsson.
Feb. 13, 2018 at 10:47 a.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 226
Likes: 10
Quoting: MG1986
Leaf fans need to keep the long-term in mind. Consider how tough it is to obtain elite-level players, let alone elite-level defenseman, Leafs should continue to draft and develop to, hopefully, find that. It costs nothing for the Leas to stay the course, but it cost them in both the long and short term to make such a trade. Fact remains that the Leafs have 2 quality in-house replacements for JVR, both of whom at least deserve a chance. I am of course referring to Josh Leivo, but more importantly, Andreas Johnsson.


I agree.
Feb. 13, 2018 at 10:53 a.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 1,930
Likes: 418
Quoting: MarioPecchia91
Why is it too much to give up? The leafs finish around top 5 in the standings and those mid-round picks are really high. Josh Leivo will never get a real opportunity to play on this team and Borgman is the only real good asset you take a risk on losing. You need to give up something in order to get Nash as there will be a bidding war for him. With Dermott and Liljegren in our system, Toronto can use Borgman as a good trade pieces without worrying about our losing much of our defensive depth in the future.


Nash, right now, is a shell of his former self and the Leafs already have too much depth on the wing. If Leivo and a 2nd doesn't get it done, with a 3 year extension as well, it's not worth doing. Eric Staal took a team friendly 3 year deal to play on a contender and to fit Nash into the future, he would have to do the same.

The Leafs need a top pairing D. Spending assets on a winger makes little sense.
Feb. 13, 2018 at 10:53 a.m.
#19
bang bang
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 351
Quoting: MG1986
I said "more defensively-reliable" and there are advanced stats to back up that position, if you had had a look. Don't let your team bias or the fact you happened to get up on the wrong side of the cranky bed skew your judgment on fact.


BTW Im not implying Nash is a good fit for Toronto, actually I think a trade between the two will never happen. But Nash is still such a good two way player who generates a ton of shots
Feb. 13, 2018 at 10:55 a.m.
#20
#LeafsFever
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 3,795
Likes: 935
Quoting: buchnevichh
BTW Im not implying Nash is a good fit for Toronto, actually I think a trade between the two will never happen. But Nash is still such a good two way player who generates a ton of shots


A-HA! So you didn't ignore list me. Aren't you just so sweet smile If I could throw a Seinfeld gif in this comment I would hahahaha!
Feb. 13, 2018 at 10:59 a.m.
#21
bang bang
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 351
Quoting: MG1986
A-HA! So you didn't ignore list me. Aren't you just so sweet smile If I could throw a Seinfeld gif in this comment I would hahahaha!


the leafs haven't won a playoff series in 14 years and made it twice since then, have a good day
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll