SalarySwishSalarySwish

ducks

Created by: blueshirts94
Team: 2016-17 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 2, 2015
Published: Nov. 2, 2015
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$3,500,000
1$1,000,000
1$1,250,000
2$2,500,000
2$2,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$950,000
1$1,500,000
Buyouts
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$73,000,000$66,966,667$0$0$6,033,333
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$1,875,000$1,875,000
LW
UFA - 3
$8,250,000$8,250,000
C
NMC
UFA - 5
$8,625,000$8,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 5
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LW, RW
RFA
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C, RW
NMC
UFA - 6
$3,750,000$3,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 6
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$1,600,000$1,600,000
C
UFA - 1
$950,000$950,000
C, RW
UFA
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD
UFA - 6
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 2
$2,300,000$2,300,000
G
UFA - 3
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
$3,700,000$3,700,000
RD
UFA - 5
$3,500,000$3,500,000
G
UFA - 5
$825,000$825,000
RD
UFA - 2
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 4
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Nov. 2, 2015 at 5:32 p.m.
#1
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 61,320
Likes: 23,613
Think Vatanen and Lindholm make a lot more than what you indicated. Rakell and Sekac might get more too. The Leafs demoted Arcobello, don't think he the answer for a possible Cup contender.
That long term contract to Kesler looks a little restrictive now doesn't it.
See All