SalarySwishSalarySwish

Maybe?

Created by: Bwells
Team: 2016-17 New York Rangers
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 16, 2016
Published: Jun. 18, 2016
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
I'm not sure Nashville would want that trade, but overall, I (as a Rangers fan) would be happy with this offseason plan. However, none of the wonder twins (Girardi and Staal) has been moved. What do you think?
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$4,000,000
4$4,500,000
2$950,000
1$600,000
2$700,000
2$2,350,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$3,500,000
2$1,750,000
Trades
1.
NYR
  1. Atkinson, Cam
Additional Details:
2017 4th round pick
CBJ
  1. Klein, Kevin
  2. Skapski, Mackenzie
Additional Details:
2016 3rd round pick
2.
NYR
  1. Ellis, Ryan
Additional Details:
2016 2nd round pick
NSH
  1. Nash, Rick ($1,800,000 retained)
3.
NYR
  1. Pysyk, Mark
BUF
  1. Gropp, Ryan
Additional Details:
2016 4th round pick
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$73,000,000$69,275,000$0$0$3,725,000

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Kreider, Chris
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW
UFA - 4
Stepan, Derek
$6,500,000$6,500,000
C, RW
UFA - 5
Miller, J.T.
$4,000,000$4,000,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Atkinson, Cam
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Brassard, Derick
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Zuccarello, Mats
$3,150,000$3,150,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Versteeg, Kris
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Hayes, Kevin
$2,350,000$2,350,000
C
UFA - 2
Buchnevich, Pavel
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW, C
UFA - 3
Lindberg, Oscar
$650,000$650,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Fast, Jesper
$950,000$950,000
RW
UFA - 1
Nash, Riley
$1,750,000$1,750,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Jensen, Nicklas
$700,000$700,000
RW
RFA - 1
Hrivík, Marek
$600,000$600,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
McDonagh, Ryan
$4,700,000$4,700,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Ellis, Ryan
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 3
Lundqvist, Henrik
$8,500,000$8,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 5
Staal, Marc
$5,700,000$5,700,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 5
Pysyk, Mark
$1,125,000$1,125,000
RD
UFA - 1
Raanta, Antti
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Skjei, Brady
$925,000$925,000
LD
UFA - 2
McIlrath, Dylan
$950,000$950,000
RD
UFA - 1
Girardi, Dan
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 4

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Jun. 18, 2016 at 10:13 a.m.
#1
palhal
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 60,720
Likes: 23,348
I think Nashville can find better value at wing than 6m of Nash for two years and without giving up two assets also.
Jun. 18, 2016 at 10:24 a.m.
#2
Philu916
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 1,465
Likes: 147
A little over cap, not an issue though since you're allowed to be over by 10%, and cap is supposedly going to be around 74-75m. What I will say is that it's hard for DG to be on the roster as the 7th dman. If he won't waive, then AV must be willing to bench him so he gets the hint that he won't play much as a Ranger.
Jun. 18, 2016 at 10:38 a.m.
#3
Bwells
Trade is one for one
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 210
Likes: 11
The deal with Nashville is the most doubtful to happen. However, they are strong on defense and it appears they like Nash (St Louis, Nashville and Anaheim are the most active in the bidding for Nash). They could keep the second if that's what would hold back the trade (Ellis at 2.5 is great value).

And Girardi... it's tough. He knows he's had a rough year and he's not at the level he needs to be. An ideal situation with this roster would be to rotate Pysyk, McIlrath and DG; but I think he would understand being benched, if he can't get his game back. And about the salary cap, I forgot to set it here, but I was counting with the 72.8 million the escalator would trigger.

Thanks for the feedback!
Jun. 18, 2016 at 2:25 p.m.
#4
Philu916
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 1,465
Likes: 147
If escalator is 5%, cap wouldn't be $72.8,it'd be closer to $74.5-$75m.
I accidentally clicked report earlier I'm on my phone and didn't notice.
Jun. 18, 2016 at 10:00 p.m.
#5
Bwells
Trade is one for one
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 210
Likes: 11
Quoting: Philu916
If escalator is 5%, cap wouldn't be $72.8,it'd be closer to $74.5-$75m.
I accidentally clicked report earlier I'm on my phone and didn't notice.


If there is the fall to 69.5 M that was predicted in May, the escalator would place the salary cap at 72.8 M. Trust me, cap hell is Rangers habitat lol
See All