thombouch

Member Since

May 5, 2024

Favourite Team

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forum Posts

Posts per Day

2.0

Forum: Armchair-GMFri. at 12:38 a.m.

Thread: Brad Tree

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RipNasty</b></div><div>You don't ever trade an "in his prime" super star for two guys over 30. It's suicidal</div></div>

Marner hasn’t worked and won’t work here. He needs a change of scenery and the Leafs would get 2 great players in return

Forum: Armchair-GMFri. at 12:37 a.m.

Thread: Brad Tree

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MoxNix</b></div><div>No chance Calgary would do that. We don't want Marner. We don't want any of your rejects.</div></div>

I’m sure they’d be loads of GMs in the NHL who would accept this trade if they were Calgary

Forum: Armchair-GMFri. at 12:36 a.m.

Thread: Brad Tree

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>Everyone with clauses in their contracts declines.</div></div>

Which is why I said unrealistic lol

Forum: Armchair-GMThu. at 7:41 p.m.

Thread: Brad Tree

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RipNasty</b></div><div>Or you could have fun but still understand that Marner is worth a great deal more than a 3rd liner and defenceman signed through to his later 30's.</div></div>

Weegar is a great top pair d-man. Coleman is a good second liner, on a decent contract

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 19 at 7:51 a.m.

Thread: Call me Brad Tree

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>They lack wingers? <strong>Forsberg, Nyqvist, Evangelista, Tomasino, Afanasyev, </strong>Kemell, L'Heureux, <strong>Parssinen, Smith, Jankowski, McCarran</strong>. And if they choose they can re-sign JAD. They have no lack of wingers.
The bolded above require waivers to be sent down (yes obviously Forsberg and Nyqvist won't be sent down).

No they love Evangelista, they will move Tomasino or Kemmel though

Just because you don't want to pay Montour 7M at max term doesn't mean he doesn't easily get it elsewhere</div></div>

Jankowski, Parssinen, Tomasino are all centers. You said they had a lack of wingers, not forwards. Not to mention Parssinen has been up and down the minors. As for L’Heureux and Kemell, they have yet to play a single NHL game… so it’s pretty hard to say they’re ready to be NHLers for next season.

It was reported a couple days ago that Nashville was interested for Marner, they’re not getting him only with Saros and one of Kemell or Tomasino. If Toronto adds Robertson to the conversation, who has scored at a really good 5v5 rate in limited minutes and still has quite some potential, it’s not disrespectful to ask for Evangelista.

For Montour, man… I’d be very surprised if he gets 7x7, I’m thinking 6.5x7 is the max he’ll get. Let’s just wait and see I guess!

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 18 at 10:38 p.m.

Thread: Call me Brad Tree

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>Nashville won't trade Evangelista and they don't have room on the wing for both Marner and Robertson

Montour will get at least 7M</div></div>

Nah they lack wingers. Forsberg, Nyquist, Smith and McCarron are their wingers signed for next season (Evangelista too, but let's not include him). Besides Forsberg and Nyquist, that's pretty weak.

As for Montour, I don't think he gets 7M with max term, maybe if he signs for 5 years.

And I do believe Nashville would be open to trading Evangelista, only if they get a star winger like Marner.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 18 at 10:20 p.m.

Thread: What you dont see coming

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Woody</b></div><div>You’re saying if you’re the oilers you would or wouldn’t take a young star nhl goalie - bright prospect in Poitras and Geekie who would help them for years for a guy that doesn’t want to be there after next year?</div></div>

I'd be surprised if Drai left. Edmonton will throw the bag at him. And he'll get at least 13, so 8x11 is really unrealistic

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 18 at 7:25 p.m.

Thread: Berube will lead us to a cup babyyy

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>StDetroitBlueWings</b></div><div>Blues get significantly worse, so you're wrong lmao</div></div>

Lmao that tells me all I need to know, you don't know puck

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 18 at 10:40 a.m.

Thread: Berube will lead us to a cup babyyy

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>StDetroitBlueWings</b></div><div>If it's such a win win for the Blues then why are you offering the trade? Your reasoning is honestly hilarious. Clearly there's a reason you're making the trade so your "win win" scenario is just a poor attempt at gaslighting.

Trade isn't happening. Not sending our 1RD for a player we won't want to pay his demands. Is he good? Sure. But not worth 10+ mil which is what he will demand. And certainly don't want him at the expense of our only defensive defenseman on this team.</div></div>

You do understand that a win-win trade doesn’t mean that it’s a good trade only for the Blues right? A win-win trade means that both of the team get better following the trade…

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 17 at 7:37 p.m.

Thread: Berube will lead us to a cup babyyy

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mokumboi</b></div><div>In what world is taking on Marner "shedding cap"?

The Blues do not want Marner. And Parayko is very much not available.</div></div>

I’m a Leafs fan. We (Leafs) shed cap, while you (Blues) get the younger, way better player

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 17 at 6:41 p.m.

Thread: Berube will lead us to a cup babyyy

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Tennisman142</b></div><div>Yeah blues decline. We need Parayko a hell of a lot more than Marner. Also the blues don't do NMC/signing bonuses or big salaries so I highly doubt Marner signs with us</div></div>

That's insane. 100 point player selke finalist and Parayko is getting paid till his late 30s. You guys get younger, we shed some cap space. That's a win-win

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 17 at 6:15 p.m.

Thread: Berubes leafs

This is a really good lineup, the only problem is the lack of forwards who could play on the PK. I wouldn't sign Perron. I'd trade Robertson for a pick because I'm not sure he'll work out here. I'd also use Perron's money to keep Kampf and sign another PK bottom 6 forward

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 17 at 10:35 a.m.

Thread: Mitchyyy

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>That's free agency, their teams lose rights at midnight on June 30th, but nobody can sign until noon Eastern on July 1st. That's 12 hours to negotiate beforehand. Marner is over a year away from free agency. He can't talk to anyone but Treliving</div></div>

Oh I see thanks for the heads up

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 17 at 10:17 a.m.

Thread: Mitchyyy

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>Lol that's not how that works. Seattle cannot legally talk to him until after July 1st, and even then only if Toronto gives permission. You think Francis is just going to take a "trust me bro, he'll sign" from Treliving?</div></div>

I'm pretty sure the whole "legal part" is useless in the NHL. I remember Jack Campbell signed a 5x5 after like 10 seconds that free agency started

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 17 at 10:15 a.m.

Thread: Trade between division

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SNipeSHowInc</b></div><div>Or Marner quite frankly</div></div>

To be honest I don't think Timmins really has a trade value. If so, not so much. For Robertson, he has his flashes, but nothing exceptional. Both together could maybe fetch a third, but I think a fourth is fair. As for Marner, I 100% agree with you. But I think that if we trade him, we're probably not going to get as much of a return as we would have liked (because of NMC/final year/playoff struggles/AAV)

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 17 at 9:46 a.m.

Thread: Your 2024-2025 Boston Bs

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JuanDamienNebraska</b></div><div>RNH is locked in for 4 more years on one of the best contracts in the league. Inflated numbers or not, that is a fact. It also a fact that he’s a very skilled player regardless of who he plays with, or else you wouldn’t be hypothetically trading for him. Ullmark is a rental, who not only will be getting a raise, but who likely won’t want to resign in a location like EDM. It’s a pretty easy no for EDM. They can improve goaltending now and longterm without having to trade RNH.</div></div>

Yeah that's a fair point

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 17 at 9:39 a.m.

Thread: Your 2024-2025 Boston Bs

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JuanDamienNebraska</b></div><div>This regurgitated, lopsided trade again? I thought that we collectively put this to bed a while ago. EDM declines.</div></div>
,
Dude, they need a goalie so bad. They get a top 10 goalie, you have to pay for that. RNH's numbers are inflated because of who he plays with

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 17 at 9:15 a.m.

Thread: Massive scenery change

These are all incredible trades for the Leafs! The problem is that the other teams have to accept them..

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 17 at 9:02 a.m.

Thread: Bye bye money Mitch

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BoomerTheHero</b></div><div>Marner is not waiving for cbus, hell he probably isnt waiving at all. Werenski definitely isnt available anyway.</div></div>

I was thinking with Mateychuk, Jiricek, Severson, potentially drafting a D this coming draft, they could look into an elite winger to complete Gaudreau/Fantilli

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 17 at 9:00 a.m.

Thread: Bye bye money Mitch

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jaok3</b></div><div>Yes Marner is waiving for Columbus LOL. That's a straight up trade at best but the leafs wouldn't be adding. Why would they want another Muzzin? This guy has played 1full season in 8yrs in the league.</div></div>

One can dream lmao. For Werenski yeah I didn't really look into his injury history

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 17 at 8:59 a.m.

Thread: Bye bye money Mitch

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>thekiller93</b></div><div>Lmao what did I just see crazy thing is you definitely think this is a good trade lol</div></div>

To be honest I'm not that high on Minten, Robertson will probably never work here, and Marner's contract is quite expensive. You get your legit number one defenseman who is elite offensively and defensively.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 16 at 11:47 p.m.

Thread: Marner to Nash

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>Isn't it <strong>amazing</strong> how much easier life is without Mitch Marner's $10.9 million cap hit?</div></div>

I always believed 11 million was a lot, but I never thought it was THAT much, ever since I’ve started using the Armchair GM lmao

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 16 at 11:23 p.m.

Thread: Marner to Nash

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jakdonaghy</b></div><div>Montour gotta be more expensive than $6.5</div></div>

You think so? He has always been a good player but I’m not sure whether he’ll be able to repeat his level of play of last year

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 16 at 10:38 p.m.

Thread: Leafs 2024

At this point I’d rather have Reinhart at 10M than Teravainen at almost 9M. Teuvo will never get that much

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 16 at 3:46 p.m.

Thread: Marner to CAL

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mjdubs</b></div><div>And who did he get as the backup... Oh no! Martin Jones is back!:scream</div></div>

I thought he was fine in front of a shaky defence. If he has a great defence he can be a reliable backup in my opinion

12 Next

Page 1

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

thombouch

thombouch

Member Since

Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day