ARCHIVE ▾

CBA ▾

CALCULATORS ▾

FANTASY-TOOLS ▾

TOOLS ▾

INTERACTIVE ▾

Gofnut999

Member Since

Jan. 6, 2017

Forum Posts

20053

Posts per Day

7.4

ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS

Forum: Armchair-GM8 hours ago

Thread: Kulikov

Why in the 🤬 does Boston downgrade in net for a goalie they don’t even need for a 4th? 🤦🏻

Forum: Armchair-GM10 hours ago

Thread: If theres a goal that everyone remembers

Stephenson will be almost double that. By Dillon, did not want you anyway. 🤷🏻‍♂️

Forum: Armchair-GM11 hours ago

Thread: low key additions

Forum: Armchair-GM11 hours ago

Thread: Oil next szn

Forum: Armchair-GM18 hours ago

Thread: lines

Boston and Ullmark both say no.

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 12:57 a.m.

Thread: Hawkey

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SWT4</b></div><div>Half league is on his no trade list, mostly west coast and Canada ( supposedly). These he can waive. The other 16 teams the bruins can trade him to. Not sure the teams on which list.
Best way for CHI to get better quick, is a good goalie.</div></div>

He has made it pretty clear he is not waiving,

However i’m not convinced Chicago is on his list though.

But he does not fit with their timeline either and are unlikely to make the move.

That Ducks trade is terrible.

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 8:25 a.m.

Thread: Why not get both

Forum: Armchair-GMThu. at 10:53 a.m.

Thread: Rounding Up Montys Guys

That trade that Bruce G was creating is comical.

B’s don’t get both Chyc and a 1st, it’s one or the other unless there are more assets going back to Ottawa. Ullmarks trade value is late 1st/3rd.

Ullmark blocks it anyway.

Buchie is not a center a Blues are insulted by that offer and decline.

There are better free agents available than Barbashev that don’t require assets to acquire.

Forum: Armchair-GMThu. at 9:37 a.m.

Thread: offseason

Arizona and Ullmark both decline

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 7:56 p.m.

Thread: Leon

Ullmark declines…again.

Boston is not giving that up for Drai.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 7:25 p.m.

Thread: Team makeover

This is absolutely terrible.

Giving away Coyle and Carlo to bring in Kane? JFC 🤦🏻

So bad I did not even mention Ullmark is not waiving for Ottawa, oh i guess i just did, and Sens never accept that anyway.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 6:06 p.m.

Thread: Bruins Big Trade

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>emoprettyboy</b></div><div>I mean these are all assumptions. reasonable assumptions, sure. but let’s not act like these are facts</div></div>

Except they are. 😉

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 6:04 p.m.

Thread: Extra ammo

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>joshelkin</b></div><div>We going to act like people don't do this every day on this website? Christ.

Boston makes sense regardless. Center depth is poor and you guys have a ton of cap space opening up this summer.</div></div>

Center depth is not poor, they have a pile of depth centers, don’t need another one. They need a #1, he is not.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 3:21 p.m.

Thread: Extra ammo

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 2:09 p.m.

Thread: What else would the Bruins like for Linus Ullmark besides Jake Allen

Well we don’t want Allen so there’s that.

There are not many pieces of interest really. Next years 1st top 15 protected. Other than Holtz that’s about it.

NJ does not have their 2nd this year to supplement a prospect with. Not real interested in next years 2nd.

The prospect pool does not match up well.

Maybe Don accepts 2nd/Casey 🤷🏻‍♂️. I would not, but i’m not him.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 2:00 p.m.

Thread: Bruins Big Trade

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bruins_Guy613</b></div><div>so they we have to establish which teams out west he'd agree to. if he's got a 15 team no trade list and Canadian teams are on it that means 3 from the Atlantic are a NO which means there's midwest-west teams he'd say yes to or hasn't blocked.</div></div>

The overall consensus is his current 16 team list which is in affect until July 1st is - the entire Pacific Division, rest of Canada, Zona/Utah, Colorado, Columbus, random 16th nobody agrees on.

On July 1st with one year remaining under contract if he wants as much control as possible, he takes teams like Vegas, Winnipeg, Seattle off his list and adds teams like NJ, Detroit, Chicago? Which leaves almost everyone on his available list, not in need or not in position to. In essence he’d almost be in complete control…if he wants 🤷🏻‍♂️

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 1:03 p.m.

Thread: Bruins Big Trade

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>emoprettyboy</b></div><div>not that I'm convinced that Ullmark would waive for Ottawa or anything, but is there any actual knowledge that he's demonstrated any unwillingness? the rumoured vetoed trade deadline deal was to LA for "geographical reasons", was it not?</div></div>

That was at the deadline. Last offseason there was mutual interest, Sens had plenty of pieces that could facilitate the trade, desperately needed a goalie, B’s wanted that cap space. Take 3 guesses why it did not happen. Sens had to settle for free agency and made a bad choice there. Unfortunate for both teams.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 11:07 a.m.

Thread: Bruins Big Trade

Ullmark is not going to Ottawa. NTC. He would have been there last offseason if he was willing.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 10:55 a.m.

Thread: additions

Canes decline. Don’t really think Boston has the pieces they’d be willing to move that Canes would be interested in for Necas.

B’s may be interested but it’s a poor fit trade wise.

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 7:01 p.m.

Thread: LePenguins 2025

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 6:32 p.m.

Thread: core 5 will never die

Well he’d be worth more than 5th than wouldn’t he. Lol.

No thanks, no need

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 6:28 p.m.

Thread: Chychy for Ullmark

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>huntsy95</b></div><div>Ullmark told me he loves Ottawa</div></div>

Ya that’s why he already blocked it once. 🙄

Boston not remotely interested in this anyway

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 6:12 p.m.

Thread: Chychy for Ullmark

Both Boston and Ullmark decline.

An Ullmark to Ottawa would look something like Bostons 1st/Forsberg retained/meh prospect.

The problem still exists. Ullmarks NTC and he says no.

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 2:49 p.m.

Thread: BigBadBruins 24-25

Stop being a homer. These all favor Boston ridiculously.

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 2:33 p.m.

Thread: Sundstrom and OConnor Attorneys at Law

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>Show me one non-playoff team that paid a 1st round pick for a rental goalie. You say fifteen. Show me one.</div></div>

Who gives a ****, that’s is not part of the equation.

The statement was, goalies rarely go for 1sts. Period. And that is BS. We are not discussing a particular team or a particular 1st. 🙄

Page 1

SalarySwish | NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly

Popular Teams
Toronto Raptors | Los Angeles Lakers | New York Knicks | Chicago Bulls | Boston Celtics | Cleveland Cavaliers | Golden State Warriors | Miami Heat | Houston Rockets

Popular Players
LeBron James | Stephen Curry | Kawhi Leonard | Pascal Siakam | Kyrie Irving | Giannis Antetokounmpo | James Harden | Kevin Durant | Nikola Jokić | Luka Dončić

Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyForum RulesAboutCBA FAQContact Us

Follow @CapFriendly

© 2024 CapFriendly.com