Caufield

Sennecke is a gem

Member Since

Sep. 8, 2022

2nd Favourite Team

Chicago Blackhawks

Forum Posts

4319

Posts per Day

7.0

Forum: Mock-Draft7 hours ago

Thread: Community mock 10th OA

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>He is 6'1" but thin...probably plays at around 6'1" 180 lbs...so size should not be a big issue. He is evasive too.</div></div>
MBN would probably be one of the better fits for NJ honestly. Good potential, 6’1 but big, NHL ready. Could make a lot of sense

Forum: Armchair-GM7 hours ago

Thread: Potential price to move up

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GuyGuyGuy</b></div><div>I think it’s becoming quite clear Silayev will be Columbus’ pick. Demidov or Lindstrom will still be available at 5</div></div>

Really? Haven’t really looked into CLB, but thought Lindstrom was a lock for them

Forum: Armchair-GM7 hours ago

Thread: Potential price to move up

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Chuck54</b></div><div>I would keep roy and pick 5</div></div>

Me too. Roy is probably got 2nd line potential. Not worth giving that type of guy to move up 1 pick

Forum: Mock-DraftYesterday at 5:34 p.m.

Thread: Community mock 9th OA

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>caufield what’s the tie-breaker?</div></div>

If there is no vote soon, Random number. If they was 1 player I voted for, I would have taken the other player, but in this case, I didn’t vote for either

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 1:44 p.m.

Thread: Trading down for a 2025 pick

Probably would need to add a top 8 protection, and take Harris instead of Struble

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 9:21 a.m.

Thread: Forget Zegras we need Necas

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jonh514</b></div><div>Yeah. The Habs always have to overpay. I really don't mind overpaying provided we get the right guy. Necas has speed and skill. If Kent thinks his speed will mesh well with the team, I'd do this deal.</div></div>

In general, doesn’t seem like Hughes is the guy to just overpay. I think he stands his ground, and if a team wants Hughes to overpay, the trade would fall through

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 9:08 a.m.

Thread: Forget Zegras we need Necas

That might lowkey be more than what MIN got for Fiala, and he was clearly worth more than Necas is. (We can’t forget Faber was just a decent prospect at the time, probably had the value of a late 1st)

Forum: Mock-DraftYesterday at 7:45 a.m.

Thread: Community mock 9th OA

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Kraken</b></div><div>Why is Silayev not offered as a suggestion in the poll? There are not many ranking sites that don't have him in the top 10.</div></div>

Already drafted (this mock draft bugged and doesn’t shown Utah/Arizona, but they drafted him

Forum: Mock-DraftYesterday at 7:41 a.m.

Thread: How far up does Wyatt climb

1st OA imo

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 10:37 p.m.

Thread: 24-25

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shaun80</b></div><div>Fair enough. Enjoying your fan mock draft. Gonna be pissed if we end up with Catton lol.</div></div>

Appreciate it man! Catton definitely wouldn’t be BPA here, but honestly, wouldn’t be a terrible pick either. There is still a lot of offensive potential with this kid

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 10:33 p.m.

Thread: 24-25

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shaun80</b></div><div>Who's your pick if Lindstrom is there?</div></div>

If Lindstrom didn't have the back injury concerns, then Lindstrom no doubt. If Lindstrom and Iginla are available at 5 and MTL pick Iggy, I completely understand why

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 10:28 p.m.

Thread: Lucky to get a 1st

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Montreal1st</b></div><div>Yeah, that is obvious now. Some people really thought that guy would get a lot more but I think Carolina will just deal with an OK player and look elsewhere to upgrade</div></div>

Or, they add on top of Necas straight up, and get the upgrade him in the same trade. (Maybe a little Marner idea here lol)

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 10:27 p.m.

Thread: 24-25

MTL do that trade if they aren't targeting Iginla (let's say it was Sennecke). If they absolutely want Iggy, they'll take him. As it looks right now, it seems strongly possible they really want him ngl (And I'm all for it!)

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 10:25 p.m.

Thread: Lucky to get a 1st

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Montreal1st</b></div><div>Not bad, not great...depends on the contract. anything over 5.5 gets shady and how much is a a 5.5/6 million dollar player worth. Of course something but not exactly the farm</div></div>

It's a tough call. He can't really get a bridge either.

I say the best solution is let CAR keep him, and they can manage their own issues. We already have so much current and future top 6 pieces, he isn't a big upgrade at all.

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 10:20 p.m.

Thread: Lucky to get a 1st

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Campabee</b></div><div>I disagree, a mid 1st and ok prospect like Kapanen is about what I figure he is worth. Basically similar to what Dach got</div></div>

good comp imo is 2nd DeBrincat trade

Forum: Mock-DraftYesterday at 10:14 p.m.

Thread: Community mock 9th OA

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DogDayCaps2</b></div><div>You might be able to get him in the 2nd round ? I haven’t seen a single mock draft where Stiga is in the top 32. Could be the Cristall of the draft</div></div>

Recently, he's been in the 1st round of most to all the people who know the prospects more than just the top 15. He's been rising, and rightfully so. Some great skill sets on that guy. He's 13th on my board right now. Overlooked only because he is slightly undersized

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 10:09 p.m.

Thread: 2 seasons from now

This team might just become dangerous...

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 9:22 p.m.

Thread: Mailloux

Definitely not

Forum: Mock-DraftThu. at 6:18 p.m.

Thread: Community mock 9th OA

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Z0ra</b></div><div>I voted Stiga but based off recent history the pick will either be Yakemchuk or MBN.</div></div>

Don't think they go Yak honestly. He's clearly not the best D on the board, and they don't really have a bunch of LDs, so Buium will be the pick if they go for D. However, they go legitimately go for any forward I put on the poll, and they would all be decent to good picks imo.

Forum: Mock-DraftThu. at 6:46 a.m.

Thread: 2023 and 2024

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>At NCAA level, Fantilli hit levels that we didn’t see much of from Celebrini, where he would take over games. I probably watched 12-15 games for both of them. Celebrini was better on power play. I am no draft expert, but I know college hockey pretty well. Where they go in pros, time will tell.

I think over time we will have a good idea on the top guys. It’s my belief that the top group of guys from 2023 goes a good 30-35 guys deep whereas 2024 only appears about 12-15 guys before drop off. 2023 was really deep.

Among dmen, I think the two drafts are very comparable. But last years crop of forwards was particularly strong.</div></div>

Imo, 2023 has a better top 4 then 2024, but overall, the 2024 is better in the 5 to 16 range. The 2023 may be better for the end of the 1st round, but way less than may say.

If we wanna compare the 5 to 16 range, assuming 1 to 4 this year is Celebrini, Demidov, Lev, Lindstrom

Iginla > Reinbacher
Silayev = Simashev
Parekh < Michkov
Dickinson > Leonard
Buium > Danielson
Catton = Dvorsky
Yakemchuk < Willander
Sennecke = But
Helenius < Benson
Eiserman > Yager
MBN > Wood
Jiricek > Honzek

And the D class this year is much better, with Reinbacher and Simashev being 3 to 6 in this years class

Forum: Mock-DraftThu. at 6:37 a.m.

Thread: 2023 and 2024

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mokumboi</b></div><div>Sir, you have vastly overrated the 24 class. Or vastly nderrated the 23 class. Whichever you prefer. :squinty</div></div>

Time will tell. I don’t think I am, I genuinely prefer the 5 to 16 range in 2024 more than in 2023

Forum: Mock-DraftWed. at 8:08 p.m.

Thread: 2023 and 2024

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>AStovetop</b></div><div>A LOT I don't agree with here. Michkov behind Lindstrom and Levshunov is pretty wild.

In general I feel like you're integrating both drafts too much. 2023 is an absurdly good draft and this year really isn't.</div></div>

See comment below

Forum: Mock-DraftWed. at 8:08 p.m.

Thread: 2023 and 2024

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>Celebrini probably falls after Carlsson and Fantilli (maybe Michkov too). Would be same tier as Will Smith. Demidov goes below Michkov, would be in same tier as Benson.

Bedard

Fantilli
Carlsson
Michkov

Celebrini
Smith

Leonard
Dvorsky

Demidov
Benson
Catton

2023 was much stronger draft. 2024 is one of the weaker and thinner pools.</div></div>

Yeah, strongly disagree.

1st off: Celebrini is most definitely in the tier with Fants and Leo.
Celebrini basically has the offense of Fantilli and the defense of Carlsson. The only thing is he is missing 2 inches, but that really doesn’t matter too much

2nd: Demidov is easily along Michkov, and imo, the talent gap is so tiny, that taking in the character and KHL contract length, I easily take Demidov

Dvorsky shouldn’t be near those names, definitely under guys like Lindstrom and Iginla

Its honestly weird people find this draft weak. Looking at each players individual, it is a hell of a draft, with the most top line ceilings I’ve since, even more than 2023

I understand some of the top line ceiling guys from this year don’t necessarily have the floor of the 2023 guys, but its not the case for everyone, a lot still have great floors and ceilings

Forum: Mock-DraftWed. at 7:56 p.m.

Thread: Real Deal

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rob32sjsharks</b></div><div>I could be a GM, all I lack is the inside knowledge and expert scouting they have access to, and the business acumen, relationships with clubs and managers, business savvy patience and logic that it takes to be a GM.</div></div>

Eh, your basically there honestly, those things aren’t really important

Forum: Mock-DraftWed. at 6:46 p.m.

Thread: Real Deal

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rob32sjsharks</b></div><div>At the time it seemed a reach! But maybe we’re all wrong honestly. Only thing that matters is how important the player is to that club not the place they were picked just look at the guys Dallas “reached” on that turned into huge key pieces for them.</div></div>

All I'll say is, there is a reason we are on Cap Friendly and not in a suit managing an NHL team. In general, it is best to trust what managements do

12 Next

Page 1

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

Caufield

Sennecke is a gem

Member Since

2nd Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day