SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Prospect Pool post Draft

Created by: duffmckagan
Team: 2024-25 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 13, 2024
Published: May 16, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
2024 NHL Draft

1 OA — Macklin Celebrini
14 OA — David Jiricek or Carter Yakumchuk
33 OA — Charlie Elick or EJ Emery
42 OA — Alfons Freij
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$894,167
3$950,000
3$875,000
3$950,000
3$950,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,500,000
2$2,500,000
3$2,500,000
4$3,250,000
2$850,000
2$850,000
2$850,000
2$850,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$900,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Celebrini, Macklin
3$950,000
Freij, Alfons
3$950,000
Elick, Charlie
3$950,000
Jiricek, Adam
3$950,000
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the SJS
2025
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the NJD
2026
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
28$87,500,000$35,450,000$0$2,137,500$52,050,000
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW
RFA - 2
Celebrini, Macklin
$950,000$950,000
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,450,000$1,450,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$918,333$918,333
LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$950,000$950,000
C
RFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C, LW
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$828,333$828,333 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$918,333$918,333
C
RFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$908,333$908,333 (Performance Bonus$30,000$30K)
RW
RFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$850,000$850,000
RW
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$918,333$918,333
C
RFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$941,667$941,667 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
RW, C
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
LD
RFA - 1
Jiricek, Adam
$950,000$950,000
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$867,500$867,500 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD
RFA
Elick, Charlie
$950,000$950,000
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$910,000$910,000
G
RFA - 1
Freij, Alfons
$950,000$950,000
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$828,333$828,333 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$950,000$950,000
LD
RFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$950,000$950,000
C
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW, LW
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$797,500$797,500 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$850,000$850,000
RW, C
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$867,500$867,500 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$875,000$875,000
RD
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$800,000$800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$836,667$836,667 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$850,000$850,000
RD
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$894,167$894,167
RD
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$841,667$841,667 (Performance Bonus$12,500$12K)
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
RW, C
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,350,000$2,350,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,400,000$3,400,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$850,000$850,000
RD
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$900,000$900,000
RW
UFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$775,000$775,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$775,000$775,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$836,667$836,667
RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$860,000$860,000
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$950,000$950,000
LD
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 16 at 10:03 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 189
Likes: 23
would trade 14 and 33 in a heartbeat for Zeev Buium
Klara liked this.
May 16 at 10:06 a.m.
#2
Tank it baby
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 7,449
Likes: 4,949
We're a bit under the cap floor. LOL

I'm just being a smart ass.
May 16 at 10:22 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2023
Posts: 2,222
Likes: 911
I have been hearing a lot of Sharks fans wanting Nabokov in the Mid Second Round. You guys could end up with a Franchise goaltender also
May 16 at 10:42 a.m.
#4
Grierless Sharks Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 3,006
Likes: 942
Doesn't look very good tbh.
I hope half these forwards work out.
Defense is bad. Goaltending is worse.
May 16 at 11:40 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 867
Likes: 326
Quoting: goodfella
Doesn't look very good tbh.
I hope half these forwards work out.
Defense is bad. Goaltending is worse.


What an odd take. The Sharks prospect pool was a consensus top 5 group, and they're about to add the 1OA + another mid 1st to it. They have a far better prospect group than almost any other NHL team at this point.
May 16 at 11:59 a.m.
#6
Stovetop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 1,012
Missing Cagnoni who I honestly think has the highest ceiling of any Sharks d-man prospect. including Yakemchuk

Also, Pohlkamp I'm going to call it now will be a 5'10" version of Pesce. He looks like a fantastic 2-way d-man.

Also don't sleep on Rimashevsky. Had a really solid year in the KHL as a draft +1. 6'2" sniper right wing. There's not a lot of footage obviously but what I have seen, he looks awesome
matthias893 liked this.
May 16 at 12:35 p.m.
#7
Grierless Sharks Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 3,006
Likes: 942
Quoting: Waffelz
What an odd take. The Sharks prospect pool was a consensus top 5 group, and they're about to add the 1OA + another mid 1st to it. They have a far better prospect group than almost any other NHL team at this point.


Not everyone works out the way they're drafted/projected is my point.
Hence why I said I'd be happy with half of these guys working out.

The defense is okay. I see a lot of 3/4/5/6 guys. Maybe 1 #2 guy. No #1's currently.

The goalies are awful, but honestly that whole category really seems to be changing. Even the top 5 goalies aren't like the top 5 goalies from a decade ago.

The one good thing Grier has done is target a LOT of 200 foot guys.
In fact, if Eiserman drops to that mid-round I bet you he looks elsewhere.
May 16 at 12:35 p.m.
#8
Grierless Sharks Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 3,006
Likes: 942
Quoting: AStovetop
Missing Cagnoni who I honestly think has the highest ceiling of any Sharks d-man prospect. including Yakemchuk

Also, Pohlkamp I'm going to call it now will be a 5'10" version of Pesce. He looks like a fantastic 2-way d-man.

Also don't sleep on Rimashevsky. Had a really solid year in the KHL as a draft +1. 6'2" sniper right wing. There's not a lot of footage obviously but what I have seen, he looks awesome


Forgot about Pohl!
May 16 at 1:03 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2023
Posts: 356
Likes: 136
Quoting: AStovetop
Missing Cagnoni who I honestly think has the highest ceiling of any Sharks d-man prospect. including Yakemchuk

Also, Pohlkamp I'm going to call it now will be a 5'10" version of Pesce. He looks like a fantastic 2-way d-man.

Also don't sleep on Rimashevsky. Had a really solid year in the KHL as a draft +1. 6'2" sniper right wing. There's not a lot of footage obviously but what I have seen, he looks awesome


I am also on the Pohlkamp train! Excited to see what he does at Denver this year.
May 16 at 1:20 p.m.
#10
Stovetop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 1,012
Quoting: matthias893
I am also on the Pohlkamp train! Excited to see what he does at Denver this year.


Dude was 205 lbs at draft day. He's a tank lol
matthias893 liked this.
May 16 at 1:52 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 867
Likes: 326
Quoting: goodfella
Not everyone works out the way they're drafted/projected is my point.
Hence why I said I'd be happy with half of these guys working out.

The defense is okay. I see a lot of 3/4/5/6 guys. Maybe 1 #2 guy. No #1's currently.

The goalies are awful, but honestly that whole category really seems to be changing. Even the top 5 goalies aren't like the top 5 goalies from a decade ago.

The one good thing Grier has done is target a LOT of 200 foot guys.
In fact, if Eiserman drops to that mid-round I bet you he looks elsewhere.


But that's the case with every prospect group. When you say it doesn't look good, it objectively does compared to almost any other team in the league (except maybe the Sabres/Wings/Jackets). For the relatively short time that they have been rebuilding, San Jose has done an incredible job acquiring high tier assets. They jumped from 17th to 4th in rankings last year, and will almost certainly go to 1st or 2nd this year.
May 16 at 2:37 p.m.
#12
Grierless Sharks Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 3,006
Likes: 942
Quoting: Waffelz
But that's the case with every prospect group. When you say it doesn't look good, it objectively does compared to almost any other team in the league (except maybe the Sabres/Wings/Jackets). For the relatively short time that they have been rebuilding, San Jose has done an incredible job acquiring high tier assets. They jumped from 17th to 4th in rankings last year, and will almost certainly go to 1st or 2nd this year.


I don't disagree that they secured rights to some potentially great/good players. Or that they've revamped pretty quick (though other teams have now vacated those spots).

I'm just trying to say "we'll see". I'm hesitant to get excited because it's so far away.
May 16 at 3:21 p.m.
#13
Stovetop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 1,012
Quoting: goodfella
I don't disagree that they secured rights to some potentially great/good players. Or that they've revamped pretty quick (though other teams have now vacated those spots).

I'm just trying to say "we'll see". I'm hesitant to get excited because it's so far away.


Honestly I don't even think it's that far away. Smith, Celebrini, Musty, Bords, Gushchin, Shakir, Thompson and Graf are all guys who could legitimately compete for a full time NHL spot this next year. And then Cardwell, Robins, Halttunen, Bystedt, Lund, Pohlkamp, Cagnoni, Edstrom, Pulli could be in that spot in a year, some of those guys with an outside chance to get a shot THIS year.

The next couple years will be fun to see a lot of new guys get shots in the show
duffmckagan liked this.
May 16 at 4:05 p.m.
#14
Grierless Sharks Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 3,006
Likes: 942
Quoting: AStovetop
Honestly I don't even think it's that far away. Smith, Celebrini, Musty, Bords, Gushchin, Shakir, Thompson and Graf are all guys who could legitimately compete for a full time NHL spot this next year. And then Cardwell, Robins, Halttunen, Bystedt, Lund, Pohlkamp, Cagnoni, Edstrom, Pulli could be in that spot in a year, some of those guys with an outside chance to get a shot THIS year.

The next couple years will be fun to see a lot of new guys get shots in the show


Just because they get a spot doesn't mean they'll perform at the level we need/want.

I love watching the young guys play. I'm one of the weirdos at those preseason games.
May 16 at 4:33 p.m.
#15
Phase 3 Is Profit
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2023
Posts: 274
Likes: 99
Zero chance anyone we draft this year past Celebrini earns an NHL spot next season.
May 16 at 4:36 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 1,654
Likes: 533
Quoting: goodfella
Doesn't look very good tbh.
I hope half these forwards work out.
Defense is bad. Goaltending is worse.


agree with you on defense prospects, but I'm pretty excited about SJ's scoring ability in the not so distant future.
Ideally SJ would make a deal to ensure they get in on some of the great defensive prospects this draft and try to resolve via UFAs in the meanwhile

goaltending is a tricky one and there might be some good surprises, like cooley. There has already been disappointments with makiniemi and chrona
May 16 at 4:55 p.m.
#17
Stovetop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 1,012
Quoting: goodfella
Just because they get a spot doesn't mean they'll perform at the level we need/want.

I love watching the young guys play. I'm one of the weirdos at those preseason games.


Yeah, that's what I'm saying. These guys who are killing it at the lower levels are going to get NHL time in the next couple years. Not all will hit, but it'll be a lot of fun.

Also random rant, but the fact that they can't stream every preseason game in this day and age is crazy.
May 16 at 7:30 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 440
Likes: 236
Quoting: Waffelz
But that's the case with every prospect group. When you say it doesn't look good, it objectively does compared to almost any other team in the league (except maybe the Sabres/Wings/Jackets). For the relatively short time that they have been rebuilding, San Jose has done an incredible job acquiring high tier assets. They jumped from 17th to 4th in rankings last year, and will almost certainly go to 1st or 2nd this year.


I point this out frequently, but I give the Athletic's prospect pool rankings a major asterisk. The biggest thing for the Sharks is they've had very few prospects graduate. Teams like Chicago had Bedard, Korchinski, and Vlasic graduate while the Sharks only lost Eklund. That's not to downplay the massive growth of the Sharks' pool, I just think I'd rate them below a few more teams.
goodfella liked this.
May 17 at 11:59 a.m.
#19
Grierless Sharks Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 3,006
Likes: 942
Quoting: AStovetop
Yeah, that's what I'm saying. These guys who are killing it at the lower levels are going to get NHL time in the next couple years. Not all will hit, but it'll be a lot of fun.

Also random rant, but the fact that they can't stream every preseason game in this day and age is crazy.


They just seem to make sports harder and harder to access. Advertising revenue.
May 17 at 12:00 p.m.
#20
Grierless Sharks Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 3,006
Likes: 942
Quoting: jamnjon
I point this out frequently, but I give the Athletic's prospect pool rankings a major asterisk. The biggest thing for the Sharks is they've had very few prospects graduate. Teams like Chicago had Bedard, Korchinski, and Vlasic graduate while the Sharks only lost Eklund. That's not to downplay the massive growth of the Sharks' pool, I just think I'd rate them below a few more teams.


I don't even think SJS is top 10 in terms of pool.
Maybe after this draft.

There are good dmen mid 1st and early 2nd.
May 17 at 12:09 p.m.
#21
Stovetop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 1,012
Quoting: goodfella
I don't even think SJS is top 10 in terms of pool.
Maybe after this draft.

There are good dmen mid 1st and early 2nd.


I mean that's just objectively untrue. No scout would agree with this
May 17 at 1:41 p.m.
#22
Grierless Sharks Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 3,006
Likes: 942
Quoting: AStovetop
I mean that's just objectively untrue. No scout would agree with this


Probably why I'm not a scout. grin
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll