canucksfan43 Profile - CapFriendly

Forum: Armchair-GM24 hours ago

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 6:12 p.m.

Thread: Tavares retained twice for goalie- would any team

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 4:49 p.m.

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>KingExLeafs</b></div><div>I think the trade is fair if Marner agrees to an extension but would he waive to play under Tocchet? Doubtful.</div></div>

Bruh its not fair

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 4:49 p.m.

Thread: Off Season ReTool

HAHAHA canucks block ur number as fast as humanly possible

Forum: Armchair-GMTue. at 3:58 p.m.

Thread: If Vancouver moves Hronek

Def fair value for Hronek and i could def see them taking that, but I've got a feeling that if they do move him it will be for a winger to play with Petey instead of trading for futures

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 4:00 p.m.

Thread: Am I a madman

Come on man, neither Ottawa nor New Jersey makes those trades

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 12:32 p.m.

Thread: if i was coach these are my game 4 lines

I like it, I just don't think the Lindholm line should be split up

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 10:57 a.m.

Thread: Buy Low candidates

No one should buy PLD lol.

Forum: Armchair-GMSun. at 4:13 p.m.

Thread: Offseason

I cant see winnipeg moving Ehlers unless the Canucks overpayed, I'd absoultely love it though

Forum: Armchair-GMSat. at 11:12 a.m.

Thread: Lines for Sunday

I wouldnt split up Lindholm Garland and Joshua. I'd just roll with the Lotto line then Suter Mikeyev and Hoglander maybe

Forum: Armchair-GMSat. at 11:08 a.m.

Thread: Best playoff 2024 clutch players

Being a canucks fan and watching McDavid and Draisatl is just scary, I've never seen two guys that can take over a game like they can

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 5 at 10:25 a.m.

Thread: Hard Questions And Decisions

NSH doesnt do that

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 2 at 12:15 a.m.

Thread: Culture Shift

Logan Cooley is untouchable

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 1 at 4:52 p.m.

Thread: Huge Leafs blockbuster

Toronto has no reason to trade Knies so i cant see them doing this

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 1 at 2:20 p.m.

Thread: Top 10 Each Position

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mv21227</b></div><div>Even though he’s struggling right now I’d still put Pettersson > Aho, Point, J Hughes and arguably Barkov and Crosby

I’d have Guentzel right around 5 for LWs and move everyone below that down 1 spot</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Imagine874859</b></div><div>Guentzel is 5th behind Forsberg.</div></div>

My bad dont know how I missed him originally, I've put in him now though

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 9:00 p.m.

Thread: Testing out a Marner extension

Idk abt paying Marner 12 mil, he'd be a fantastic add but thats alot of money

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 8:43 p.m.

Thread: Soft players Ive seen people offer for Brady

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mv21227</b></div><div>We don’t need him. Especially at the absurd price Sens fans have asked for. We could get an actual superstar for the package Sens fans want</div></div>

We also dont really have the funds it would take to acquire and maintain his caphit, unless we completely gutted our future and moved Lekk, Willander Hoglander etc. we're already locked into Miller and Petey longterm and wheneber Tkachuk is up for a new contract he'll get 10+ mil i think and we've seen how having that much money tied into a few players can be a disaster at times (Toronto). Brady would be an awesome add to the Canucks but unless we moved one of our core guys to make way it might not work

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 6:20 p.m.

Thread: Soft players Ive seen people offer for Brady

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>csick</b></div><div>If you blame Brady for sitting at home then you’re a moron.

-40 saves below expected
And Chychrun -30 on the year is all you need to know. While Kubalik and Hamonic were 2 of the worst liabilities in the league</div></div>

Dw canucks fans are well aware of Hamonic

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 6:13 p.m.

Thread: Soft players Ive seen people offer for Brady

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>csick</b></div><div>All you understand about hockey is production got it. More points = better lmao . NOT

No GM would start a team with Bratt or Power over Brady</div></div>

Jesus dude ur just an angry fella hey. I'm well aware there is more to hockey than production for example, wins which the sens cant figure out

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 6:08 p.m.

Thread: Soft players Ive seen people offer for Brady

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>csick</b></div><div>Not a single team wanted to trade assets for JT Miller when he was available.

If Brady is available there would be a massive massive bidding war . He may not be more skilled than his brother but he’s way more of a power forward and way grittier</div></div>

Massive bidding war that wouldnt include anyone close to a player as talented as Petey or Power or Bratt

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 6:04 p.m.

Thread: Soft players Ive seen people offer for Brady

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>csick</b></div><div>I wouldn’t trade Brady for 5 JT Millers lmao</div></div>

Good grief, i see this is a lost cause cause obviously you think Brady is a modern day Eric Lindros or something

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 6:01 p.m.

Thread: Soft players Ive seen people offer for Brady

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>csick</b></div><div>Yet it’s Canucks fans everywhere desperate for Brady. Hope Nashville wins the series.

I don’t want any of your soft players.

Have fun with the softy Lekkerimaki soon too .</div></div>

Brady wouldnt even be the second best forward on the Canucks MIller clears him easily, we'll enjoy our "soft" players as long as Sens fans enjoy never making the playoffs and saying being "offseason winners"

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 5:58 p.m.

Thread: Soft players Ive seen people offer for Brady

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>csick</b></div><div>You simply don’t trade a Tkachuk unless it’s an overpay.

He’s a unicorn .</div></div>

and Petey is a bonafide 90+ pt two way beast, which brady isnt.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 5:55 p.m.

Thread: Soft players Ive seen people offer for Brady

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>csick</b></div><div>I wouldn’t . Not a fan of Power at all.

I’d consider Pettersson but the extra 4 mill and added softness/injury concerns would make me say no</div></div>

and people thought Canucks fans were biased with how they felt abt Petey trades. Brady isnt the player Petey is and if you genuinley think hes more valuable I'd like whatever you're smoking

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 5:52 p.m.

Thread: Soft players Ive seen people offer for Brady

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>csick</b></div><div>Brady’s value is not all in points. Brady would be one of the most in demand players in the league if he was on the market</div></div>

You're lying to yourself if you say you wouldnt trade Brady 1 for 1 for a guy like Power or Petey

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

canucksfan43

Member Since

Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day