SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

RussianRangers9

RussianRangers39
Member Since
Nov. 10, 2020
Favourite Team
New York Rangers
2nd Favourite Team
Colorado Avalanche
Forum Posts
2136
Posts per Day
1.6
Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 2:27 p.m.
Thread: Detroit
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Lancebmx</b></div><div>Hell no from Detroit. We wouldn't even include Copp in a Trouba deal let alone a first and him.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Swedish_Mafia</b></div><div>Woof. Could remove the 1st and Detroit still says no.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JhonnyCanuck5</b></div><div>1) Detroit declines

2) Sens fans are fun. Should they trade Brady? No probably not. But 3 1sts plus players isn’t a terrible offer. Sens likely decline but idk if it’s THAT far off, especially if they’re looking more at a rebuild</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>WingsHomer</b></div><div>Trouba without retention is a cap dump. Teams have to PAY to dump cap. They don't get premium assets in return..</div></div>

https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/5206661

This is the Detroit idea
Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 12:00 p.m.
Thread: Bye trouba and scoring RW1
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Lancebmx</b></div><div>We like Ras and just extended him. On a contribution point, I think Ras and Kakko would be about equal. I will agree that Kakko might hold more value based on what would likely be a higher potential. But in terms of what we get, we are basically paying a second to dump Petry but take on a more expensive Trouba. I consider that an upgrade but as of right now the forward would be a slight downgrade potentially, it's really hard to compare the two players.
I really like the idea of Trouba to Detroit but the deal has to be right for us. I don't know if this is it. We fill one hole to create another with worse cap implications and pay on top.</div></div>

Thanks for the clear explanation. I see your point. I feel Detroit feels right for Trouba but then again it’s a business first
Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 11:13 a.m.
Thread: Bye trouba and scoring RW1
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Lancebmx</b></div><div>You can probably get Hutson in your own pick range.
Detroit says no thanks. Trouba to Detroit make some sense but he's expensive and has trade protection. I don't see us paying much, if anything at all for him at his full cap hit. We can sign one of the multiple free agents or just run it back, which is not ideal of course. I would love to take a chance on Kakko but this deal as it stands is not great for Detroit.</div></div>

My reasoning on Detroit trade was based on other posts where I’ve seen Trouba for petry and a 3rd with his full cap hit. I thought that Kakko has slightly more value than Rasmussen so trouba 2024 4th and Kakko for Rasmussen petry and a 2nd was pretty close. But the only way I see it altering is maybe 1 mill retention on trouba or remove the 2nd pick and no retention. Can I get your thoughts?