SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

MoxNix

Member Since
Aug. 6, 2022
Favourite Team
Calgary Flames
Forum Posts
7951
Posts per Day
12.2
Forum: Fauteuil - DGYesterday at 10:15 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 1:43 a.m.
Thread: A deal Calgary might make with Toronto
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>KingExLeafs</b></div><div>Marner won't waive to Calgary.</div></div>

He might when he gets a promise they'll trade him at the deadline to a team on a list of 4 or 5 teams provided by him. If he won't waive for that he probably won't waive for anything.

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dh91</b></div><div>Wow this is bad</div></div>

What's bad is all you Leafies who think you're going to get a huge haul for a soft player you want to get rid of who doesn't perform in the playoffs, has a huge contract now and is UFA a year from now.

He's a rental and he'll get a rental price. That's it.

Don't pretend 7.9 mil in cap space including 3 mil/yr retention for 2 years on a one of your team's biggest needs is worthless either. The cap space allows you to address other needs too, like defense.
Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsYesterday at 11:30 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 10:44 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 9:41 p.m.
Thread: Leafs
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MoxNix</b></div><div>Lily is a bottom pairing D on the Leafs a team that didn't have a good D corps and he doesn't hit. Pachal and Kylington weren't bad playing 2nd pair in Calgary. Do we want better defensemen for the 2nd pair? Sure but Lily isn't the answer.

Hanley got waived by the Stars not the Flames. He was actually surprisingly good defensively in Calgary, not just on the bottom pair either. Is he a long term solution? No probably not but he's better and cheaper than Lily. Then there are all the prospects who are NHL ready or close.

On top of all that, Lily is an arbitration eligible RFA with a 1.5 mil qualifying offer or roughly double what Hanley and all the prospects make. Hard pass on Lily, he has almost no value to Calgary.</div></div>
Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 9:33 p.m.
Thread: Leafs
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shaun80</b></div><div>I'm not a huge fan of the player but be realistic here. Kylignton was OK, got better towards the end of the season but we still don't know what we're getting. I like Miromanov, but his sample size is way to small to know what he going to be. Pachal is a bottom pairing d man who hits. Hanley got waived and couldn't even solidify a spot on our bottom 6 last season.</div></div>

Lily is a bottom pairing D on the Leafs a team that didn't have a good D corps and he doesn't hit. Pachal and Kylington weren't bad playing 2nd pair. in Calgary Do we want better defensemen for the 2nd pair? Sure but Lily isn't the answer.

Hanley got waived by the Stars not the Flames. He was actually surprisingly good defensively in Calgary, not just on the bottom pair either. Is he a long term solution? No probably not but he's better and cheaper than Lily. Then there are all the prospects who are NHL ready or close.

On top of all that, Lily is an arbitration eligible RFA with a 1.5 mil qualifying offer or roughly double what Hanley and all the prospects make. Hard pass on Lily, he has almost no value to Calgary.