SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Lafleur10

Juraj SlafDadsky
Member Since
Jun. 11, 2022
Favourite Team
Montreal Canadiens
Forum Posts
290
Posts per Day
0.4
Forum: Armchair-GMMay 15 at 1:59 p.m.
Forum: Mock-DraftMay 14 at 11:48 p.m.
Thread: Real Deal
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rob32sjsharks</b></div><div>Smith in 24 would be top 2 pick with the question being Smith or Celebrini, Levshunov goes 10-12 in 23
And musty should have been top 15 last year and would be top 5 this year after the year he had! I feel if Musty was in this draft most teams would pick him over Levshunov.

I could be a homer but how often do you see an 18/19 year old 6’2” forward score near 2PPG in the OHL?</div></div>

Smith if he were a year younger would be in the mix with Demidov and Lindstrom for anywhere between 2nd and 6/7th overall, most of the top ten teams this year NEED to add to their defensive depth, very convenient considering its a defensively strong draft. It's nothing against Smith's skill, he's really really good, but he might even go lower that 5th in this years draft.
You're putting a little too much value in Musty, sure he's a very strong young prospect, but he barely makes the mid teens if he was in this years draft, and he does not move that high in a 2023 redraft because 2023 was just so f*cking STACKED. You're also undervaluing Levshunov, he goes above both Reinbacher and Nemec as the first defensemen taken in the last two years drafts. Any team that does not already have two guaranteed Elite right handed defenders AND an extra young RHD trying to take one of those guys jobs does not pass on Levshunov.
Montreal could at 5 pick Catton, much better season than Musty at younger and in a harder (Slightly harder I will admit but still harder) league.
Forum: Repêchage SimuléMay 9 at 12:20 p.m.
Forum: Repêchage SimuléMay 8 at 11:37 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMMay 8 at 11:26 p.m.
We're not offersheeting Byfield, No reason for him to want to leave LA at this point, and were just asking to have Slaf/Ghule/Hutson revenge sheeted in a few years (Think Aho and Kotkaniemi). Not only that but the cost of the offer sheet required to get him is ridiculous, hypothetically a top 10 pick next year, then a top 16 pick the year after that, not to mention the extra draft capital, we could get a player on par for less through a trade of smarter assets.
If we are getting Zegras we'll be doing so without trading Reinbacher, I don't even think I'd do the trade 1 for 1, let alone throw in the extra pick and our best faceoff guy. With 5th overall this year we're going to be getting a forward with potentially more upside then Zegras, and with better control over that players contract moving forward. If we give up Reinbacher we throw ourselves a year behind, giving up our future 1st Defenceman.
That San Jose deal is awful, we are never going to give up two promising young prospects for essentially nothing, we're at a stage in the rebuild where we can afford to wait out the bad contracts (Anderson, Gallagher), either that or wait until we can trade them with retention when they're at a year or two left on their deals.
These moves are far too near sighted, I understand that everyone wants the team to start competing, but Hughes as GM is constantly praising patience, building the team the right way. You're suggesting we pick up compete now forwards, despite not yet having proven goaltending, a solid and well developed defence core, and leaving us with no cap to sign Slaf or Ghule.
Even if this team did manage to compete, we'd have to trade away core pieces almost immediately, look at every piece you're giving away and think about what else we can spend them on, trading up in the draft to get another core forward, addressing positional needs, filling the prospect pool before picks become expendable during our window.
Forum: Armchair-GMMay 3 at 1:49 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 29 at 4:02 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 24 at 4:22 p.m.