ARCHIVE ▾

CBA ▾

CALCULATORS ▾

FANTASY-TOOLS ▾

TOOLS ▾

INTERACTIVE ▾

ChiHawk

Member Since

Apr. 24, 2017

Favourite Team

Chicago Blackhawks

2nd Favourite Team

Colorado Avalanche

Forum Posts

19295

Posts per Day

7.5

ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS

Forum: Armchair-GM19 hours ago

Thread: Garland and Luostarinen

Hawks pass, maybe a 5th rounder

Forum: Armchair-GM19 hours ago

Thread: Hello Darkness My Old Friend

Kotkaniemi is basically a cap dump

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 10:02 a.m.

Thread: Leafssnot

JT at $11M cap hit is a cap dump

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 11:59 p.m.

Thread: Next year

Hawks definitely don't need a LHD guy, wrong team

Forum: Mock-DraftYesterday at 11:44 p.m.

Thread: Mock Draft 2024

Highly doubtful Chicago drafts a LHD with any of their picks. They have Vlasic locked in for the first line, Korchinski (former #7 OA) developing for 2nd line, and Del Mastro, Kaiser, Alan, and Phillips fighting for the 3rd line spot.

Also zero chance Demidov drops out of the top 5...he's the only player that if he played in NA would be challenging Celebrini for #1OA

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 11:43 p.m.

Thread: Only Z trade I take

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 11:42 p.m.

Thread: New Era

Hawks are building a team to actually compete for a cup, not get bounced out of the first round year after year

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 5:40 p.m.

Thread: Bert and Ernie

Marner is not worth that for a 1 year rental to a rebuidling team.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 4:59 p.m.

Thread: Hawks Flyers trade ideas

The Hawks are very high on del mastro, they aren't trading him for what is a weaker 1st round after pick #8

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 4:56 p.m.

Thread: Young Talent

Hawks might actually agree to that if they have a player targeted

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 4:55 p.m.

Thread: Off Season ReTool

Nobody is paying a 3rd or even 4th round pick for Timmons who was a free waiver wire player

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 3:50 p.m.

Thread: Pipe dream

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LivingAnew</b></div><div>I think it's three more years? That timing could be just right. I lean towards accepting this deal.</div></div>

Yes, you're right 3 more years. Depends on Rinzel, he's probably 2 more seasons away, and also depends if the Hawks draft Levshunov and move Murphy. A lot of "if's" for the Hawks to do this IMO.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 3:49 p.m.

Thread: Tavares Waives for Buyout

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DrumMan44</b></div><div>What exactly is silly about this? If Toronto wants to re-tool and free up $11 million in cap space, this is a fairly painless way to do so. The discussion surrounding Tavares seems to be surrounding his no movement clause. If he won't waive it to go to another team, this might be the only way to get him to do so: by buying him out so he can punch his own ticket.</div></div>

It will cost Toronto more than 11 spots in the draft to free up $11M in cap space for a player that is roughly worth a $6M cap hit. 11 spots is nothing and no team is doing Toronto or any team any favors.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 3:47 p.m.

Thread: Pipe dream

Don't think Marino is worth a 3rd to the Hawks because he's not needed for 4 years.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 3:39 p.m.

Thread: DRW Perfect Offseason

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>rednwhite</b></div><div>I agree the Hawks won't be paying to take on Maatta but he was one of the better 3rd pair d in the league last year based on analytics. I'm sure they would take him for a late round pick or for future considerations. Could easily flip him at next years deadline for a 3rd or 4th.</div></div>

Hawks don't have the room on the left side to even play Maatta. He is also a well known entity in Chicago and he's a #6 guy on most teams which doesn't fetch much at the TDL.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 1:59 p.m.

Thread: DRW Perfect Offseason

Zero chance the Hawks take Maatta even for free, which means, if you want to move him to the hawks...you need to pay not the other way around

Forum: Mock-DraftWed. at 12:56 p.m.

Thread: 2019 Redo

Vlasic is much higher, definitely top 15 if not top 10...he was a top 2 defensive player in the d-zone amongst all NHL players as a rookie playing top line minutes against the toughest competition. He's shown way more than most on this list, broberg notably.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 12:32 p.m.

Thread: 2024 roster 1

No on Timmons from the Hawks...he's a waiver wire player which means he has little to no worth

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 11:53 a.m.

Thread: Adding another 1st round pick and Necas

Walhstrom is into bust territory at this point so not going to be highly valued as a part of any trade which is why the Islanders may be better off keeping him.

Moving Lee will cost a 1st or at (2) 2nds, without anything going back.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 11:39 a.m.

Thread: Kings retool

That's not enough to move PLD. His on ice results against his cap hit and term are toxic and going to cost quite a lot to move at this point. As much as it stings, the Kings are better off buying him out versus the including the assets it would take to move him such as (2) 1sts plus Turcotte just to get a conversation going likely.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 10:45 a.m.

Thread: Keefe out Berube In re stocking some picks

Hawks decline...Jarnkrok isn't worth much more than what can be found for free in free agency, Lillypad may be worth a 2nd or 3rd to another team but not the Hawks who are looking for size in a 3rd line role, and Robertson might be interesting for a 3rd rounder but no more given his injury history and size.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 10:43 a.m.

Thread: Marner

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SociallyHawkward</b></div><div>And he'll be on his rookie deal instead of marners ridiculous 12 mil+ contract. Plus he's closer to bedards age unlike marner who will start to decline when bedard hits his prime.</div></div>

Or more like be in total decline 7 years from now when Bedard is peaking.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 10:38 a.m.

Thread: Marner

If the Hawks want a dynamic RW playmaker, they will draft Demidov who aligns with their rebuild timeline and will be on a ELC. There is zero reason to do this as such, nor is Marner worth the 2nd overall pick in the draft anyway.

A way better solution short term is to draft Marner and bring Kane back at $5M per year for 4 years.

Forum: Armchair-GMTue. at 1:14 p.m.

Thread: Pittsburgh penguins

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>fil97</b></div><div>yes it is more than enough. it is actually crazy to think pit will have to pay to get rid of him at all. I can easily see the sharks paying a 4th or 5th to have a veteran to play with their kids through the 3 to 4 years of rebuild... 3/4 years being generous.

no, obviously rust is much better then Kuzmenko. it is not even a debate. if I were pit I would never do that trade, I'd try to get weeger through prospects and picks plus graves keeping rust.</div></div>

Hawks aren't in the position of needing that kind of player as they already have that role.

Forum: Armchair-GMTue. at 1:06 p.m.

Thread: Pittsburgh penguins

Hawks decline. Move up from pick 67 to 46 is not enough to take on 4 years of Rickard at $5M per year

Page 1

SalarySwish | NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly

Popular Teams
Toronto Raptors | Los Angeles Lakers | New York Knicks | Chicago Bulls | Boston Celtics | Cleveland Cavaliers | Golden State Warriors | Miami Heat | Houston Rockets

Popular Players
LeBron James | Stephen Curry | Kawhi Leonard | Pascal Siakam | Kyrie Irving | Giannis Antetokounmpo | James Harden | Kevin Durant | Nikola Jokić | Luka Dončić

Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyForum RulesAboutCBA FAQContact Us

Follow @CapFriendly

© 2024 CapFriendly.com