Quoting: exo2769
Good question and it's fair and I promise I will directly answer it. Before that I want to make sure we both understand that how long something takes osba different question than doing something right vs wrong. So regardless of 1 - 15 years... the time it takes is irrelevant if we're going to mess stuff up.
I think Kyle Davidson's own words speak best. It's not an immediate Cup Contender situation. We want to get better next year. We need to get to the end of the season with more hope of making the playoffs than we had last year.
Also, another Kyle Davidson quote from a previous TDL talking about Strome/Kubalik/DeHaan and why they were not traded away for futures...if our prices weren't meet, then we clearly thought more of these players than other teams did. That's why they're still on this team. We value them more.
I bring those two up because A.) Were developing our prospects with intent. Not just throwing players around for late 1sts. B.) ANYONE trading for Jones HAS to view him as a 1st pair RD that'll play 25 ATOI against opponents top lines. So you pay our price...or he just means more to us.
The rebuild will take 2-3 more year ls before playoff caliber. 4-5 more before hopes of a deep run.
I don't really disagree with your premise, I just have the feeling you're misunderstanding me. I'm not suggesting you just fill the roster with rookies and throw them to the wolves, this would just be one of many transactions to complete the lineup.
I actually think what you're doing with the forward group is the perfect example, getting what you can for guys like Kane, Hagel, Debrincat, etc., and using that cap to bring in guys like foligno and (in theory) Corey Perry who may be past their primes, but have a wealth of experience to share with a rebuilding team.
The only issue with Jones filling that role is that it will likely extend past his prime years, with his hefty contract potentially becoming an obstacle when you're ready to compete.
I'll compare your current situation to that of arguably the greatest dynasty in the modern Era (all respect to the hawks), because I think the parallels are pretty incredible. In 2008 the lightning drafted Stamkos 1st overall and signed 30 year old dan boyle to an 8 x 6.66 mil contract, a pretty high cap for one of the leagues best defensemen at the time. They were probably a bit further ahead at the time with guys like St. Louis and Lecavalier still in the mix, but regardless, they end up trading boyle for futures only one year into his deal.
The current iteration of the lightning made their first deep run in 2015, losing in the cup final, year 6 of Hedman and year 7 of Stamkos. The year prior they had lost in round 1, after missing the playoffs in each of the 2 years before that. By this time boyle was 36, overpaid and declining, 2 years away from retirement.
They'd lose in the conference finals the next year, then miss the playoffs due to injuries the year after. By this time they had traded away the old order, like Ben bishop, St. Louis, Lecavalier and boyle. After missing the playoffs they completed two shrewd moves to bring in McDonagh and Sergachev (and Miller), to balance out some of the old vets like Girardi and brewer.
That year they go to the conference final again, backstopped by their new phenom vasilevskiy, who came to them out of the dan boyle trade tree. They'd infamously get swept to the jackets in round 1 of the next year before going on to win 2 Stanley cups in a row in 3 cup finals appearances.
There were no bad contracts on the team because those players were traded when their value was still solid, opening up cap and bringing in assets to acquire the likes of sergachev and mcdonagh, rather than having to spend what assets they had to clear space with cap dumps or overpay for retention (a la the leafs under dubas).
Again, the parallels here are hard to deny. You got your generational goalscoring center 10A last year, and in my opinion should look to add your franchise defenseman at 2nd overall this year, just as lightning did. I also think you should capitalize on Jones value while it's at its highest, continuing to build the pipelines while being cautious to reserve that future cap for your incredible core, bringing in short term vets like foligno (TJ Brodie? Erik Johnson?) To guide the ship along the way.
Doing all that while bringing in solid young players who can grow with your core, and having the chance to add someone like Tij Iginla at 8? Seems like a no brainer to me honestly, also allowing Jones to compete for a cup in his prime (if you love something, let it go).
I think it will take a good while, but eventually there's so much talent and assets on that hawks team that a cup seems inevitable, so long as you maximize that cap when your window opens. You won't have a lack of pieces to spend it on for sure.
BTW, I'm a huge bears fan as well, what a time to be a sports fan in the city of Chicago!