TJTwolf Profile - CapFriendly

Forum: Armchair-GM4 hours ago

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>I would think so, but clock is ticking.</div></div>

Have to say I'm mildly surprised but have at him! Be a good pick up for you.

Forum: Armchair-GM15 hours ago

Thread: Two June 1 deadline targets

Have to imagine the Avs are going to try to sign Sward and get him on the Eagles roster again next year. Just no reason for them to give him up.

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 10:48 p.m.

Thread: solid

Nope.

Forum: Armchair-GMFri. at 3:37 a.m.

Thread: Contending Retool

If I were GMCM I'm taking this for the Avs. Short term it's a downgrade at 2C, a solid 4C, a 1st and a third next year or to use at the TDL. Long term it's a probably solid 2C, a good young player to come in and a third.

Forum: Armchair-GMThu. at 9:10 a.m.

Thread: If Mitts wants too much

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>earl08</b></div><div>Frost would allow COL to re-up Drouin. But part of the Avs' 2C role is sub for MacKinnon when injured. JTC struggled, Naz was great, Soderberg... Frost isn't that guy. Mitts can handle it & doesnt have the numbers to get over $7.</div></div>

I'd question your belief in Mitts being able to handle it but opinions vary. I don't believe either Frost or Mitts are capable of being that guy for any great length of time. However they are also both significantly younger than Naz was and he'd grown to that point. A 25 yr old Kadri wouldn't have been able to do it either.

Forum: Armchair-GMThu. at 9:07 a.m.

Thread: If Mitts wants too much

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hammerwise</b></div><div>Yeah, agree with that, maybe Desalauriers at 50%, I do think that COL needs somebody to pick up MacDermid's role, and unlike MacD, deslauriers is an everyday player</div></div>

Yeah that's fair comment, purely more of a preference on my part.

Forum: Armchair-GMThu. at 9:06 a.m.

Thread: Fixed

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hammerwise</b></div><div>I just did a COL team, with frost, zamula, deslauriers AND a good 2nd for Mitts. It isn;t an equal player of Mitts, but it fills 2-3 holes on the team and leaves cap space....</div></div>

Yep seen it and commented, not a bad job and a pretty fair offer and I should say this one in pure value on here favours the Avs though I think would probably get rejected purely on the lack of a C coming back, that's the only reason.

Forum: Armchair-GMThu. at 9:01 a.m.

Thread: If Mitts wants too much

I think that's probably close to a fair offer IF the Avs can't afford Mitts. I'd prefer not to take Deslauriers (use that money on Trenin along with Cogs' money - he's done imo but the Avs may re-sign him though I don't see a raise for him if they do and JJ should be done too) and just make it Frost, Zamula and the 2nd.

It's a realistic take on a maybe if Mitts can't be signed and also an offer the Avs should consider if it were actually offered in reality. Good job on the whole imo.

Forum: Armchair-GMThu. at 8:56 a.m.

Thread: Fixed

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hammerwise</b></div><div>True, but its only his rights and you;'re only trading him if his demands are too high.

And Koneckny for mitts's RIGHTS straight up isn;t off by tons, but adding a 1st and a high in the round 2nd and a desireable bottom 6 guy?

Again this isn;t for the player its for the negotiating rights alone, and Mitts might be asking for 9+, and its also relative to what COL can afford or do to reverse the latest course of diminshing results.

I for one, dont think hes on the market, COL keeps him is a no brainer, but I cant see PHI dismantling and selling off young players/draft picks for young players who look better elsewhere.</div></div>

I think in purely value terms it's probably somewhere in the middle of the opinons of the two of you. Yes, it's only his rights and if Konecny had term then I'd say Konecny for Mitts' rights would be fine (pure value). A first and Hathaway would not be and Konecny with only one year also wouldn't be. There's also no C in this trade that the Avs would almost certainly be looking for in any trade that gave up Mitts (bar them finding one in FA). Tbh if it were Frost (plus probably a small addition) then there might be a conversation to be had.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 11:59 p.m.

Thread: Adding some size and defense

Avs decline.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 10:56 p.m.

Thread: Crouse

Too many pieces involved in that one for me.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 10:54 p.m.

Thread: Who Needs Picks Anyways

Avs decline.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 10:51 p.m.

Thread: Wishful thinking

You are indeed the King of it!

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 10:51 p.m.

Thread: building off ideas

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>swissmontana</b></div><div>I guess I'm not sure what the goal is here. is this if the Avs suddenly have both Landy & Nuke back on salary? which would only happen if both were playing?</div></div>

Other than that it's pretty bad lol.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 2:37 p.m.

Thread: other possible changes

Avs decline. Can't afford Ullmark now. Can't afford to re-sign him.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 2:03 p.m.

Thread: avs 2025

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>PeterPoggers</b></div><div>this is 2025-26 you re tard</div></div>

My bad (though being a c**t about it doesn't endear you) but the most important point still stands. Terrible return for Girard.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 1:50 p.m.

Thread: Yetti or Not 4 a Joke

Crouse would certainly be one of my favoured targets as a lower level Landy kind of temp replacement.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 1:38 p.m.

Thread: avs 2025

Firstly Val can't be traded until he comes back. Secondly that's a terrible return for Girard. Thirdly Landy likely won't start the season (and Lehky may not either).

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 1:36 p.m.

Thread: comp lineup

Avs decline. Can't afford Marner. Don't need Marner. Don't want Marner.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 1:36 p.m.

Thread: Nuke Back for Thanksgiving

I was going to crack one about turkeys and the Avs being stuffed but I decided to (kind of) refrain. The maths aspect is actually one of the interesting parts (can't believe I actually put that but hey-ho) in the whole conundrum. More clarity from the league or the Avs on what cap space will or won't be available would be helpful though.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 1:19 p.m.

Thread: Gaining Some Weight

Avs decline.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 1:18 p.m.

Thread: Blockbuster if landy doesnt come back

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ArakinSkywalker</b></div><div>yeah i'm just bored and running out of ideas mostly, there won't be much of a point to the majority of the ones i do over the off-season at this point</div></div>

Am in similar mind atm especially with the whole not knowing who is and who isn't going to be available and when/if they might be.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 12:44 p.m.

Thread: Blockbuster if landy doesnt come back

Don't see the point in paying for pretty much a lateral move for older players. If Landy doesn't come back then the Avs would simply have to look for a physical forward who can play in the top 6.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 8:48 a.m.

Thread: Rebuilding the depleted canes

Avs decline. They can't afford to sign Necas.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 5:30 a.m.

Thread: Toronto

Still an easy no for the Avs.

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

TJTwolf

Member Since

Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day