Ste_Catherine_Street

Member Since

Jun. 19, 2019

Favourite Team

Montreal Canadiens

2nd Favourite Team

Colorado Avalanche

Forum Posts

1727

Posts per Day

1.0

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 10:22 a.m.

Thread: According to The Hockey News

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Black61</b></div><div>Daily reminder that lyle richardson is a moron</div></div>

Hahahahaha

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 10:21 a.m.

Thread: According to The Hockey News

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>KingExLeafs</b></div><div>What idiot proposed this? Awful trade for the Habs.</div></div>

Agree. It was on The Hockey News

Forum: Armchair-GMTue. at 2:05 p.m.

Thread: Tampa Bay Trading Away Cirelli

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Dan_the_Man</b></div><div>You drastically I mean drastically undervalued Raddysh he led all I repeat all TB players in 5v5 TOI both Jon Cooper and Julien Brisebois think much more than apparently you do. This is trade sucks for TB.</div></div>

I absolutely I mean absolutely disagree with I repeat you. This trade is dumb for Mtl.
Cirelli has a bad contract.
It might be good in 3 years when the cap goes up, be he's a 3C.
No 3C makes $6M+ in the NHL.

Forum: Armchair-GMTue. at 1:54 p.m.

Thread: Buyers party

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Digitalbooya06</b></div><div>Nice projection.

Curious to know which part of my post was so dramatic. Yurov being the best center in the trade or trying to show you how bad the proposal looks from a non habs fan perspective?</div></div>

Read my original post properly. I never said Yurov *wasn't* the best C prospect in the trade. The other person had mentioned Minnesota would want a better C prospect than Yurov, and all I said is I don't see another team offering a *better* prospect than *Yurov*
If you think Mtls offer here is worth 4 2d round picks, sorry, you're a moron. If you're being overdramatic to prove a point, than no one will listen to you.

Forum: Armchair-GMTue. at 11:24 a.m.

Thread: Buyers party

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Digitalbooya06</b></div><div>What are you talking about? Yurov is the best center in that trade. What does Kaprizov signing or not signing have to do with Yurov?

If I offer you 4 2nd round picks and Carson Lambos for the 5th overall pick, are you pulling the trigger? Cause that’s how this trade looks to a Minnesota fan.</div></div>

Omg dude. You're an overdramatic tool. Get off the website if you're so emotional.

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 4:25 p.m.

Thread: Buyers party

As a Habs fan I'm not sure I like this trade.

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 4:24 p.m.

Thread: Buyers party

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caerii</b></div><div>To be very clear, total value aside, because I'm sure everyone will say "that's way too much value", Minnesota isn't trading Yurov unless there is one singular better piece coming back that comprises 100% of total value of the return

Minnesota sees Yurov as the future 1C here, and one of the primary pieces that they hope entices Kaprizov to extend. It would take a better center prospect to move him. Matheson as the centerpiece with a bunch of other super mediocre/average prospects isn't even close to what Minnesota needs to consider trading Yurov.</div></div>

Ok, fair point, and I agree. BUT, if Minnesota were to conclude they can't re-sign Kaprisov, then this trade is very enticing. I'm not sure any team would offer a better C prospect.
And by the way, this is why I don't understand why they want to move Rossi. He's going to be a great C.<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>squashmaple</b></div><div>When you find yourself still adding more and more pieces to one side of a trade to make it more fair, it's a bad trade.</div></div>

There is a lot of value going to Minny here. Just because Minny has the best player in the trade, it doesn't discount the solid Dcore coming back the other way.

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 4:18 p.m.

Thread: Elvis needs a new home

Lol. I don't know which trade is the worst.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 9 at 11:25 a.m.

Thread: What it takes to move UP to 2

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LivingAnew</b></div><div>I realize that there are so many possibilities being discussed here, that's it's getting confusing... To confuse things a bit more (*wink*), if CGY's '25 1st were dropped from the deal, and it came down to MTL's #5 OA & WPG's #27 OA, along with Beck and Reinbacher, the Hawks would be fools to pass that up, IMO.

If I were MTL, Reinbacher would be the deal-breaker for me. Although... if MTL really wants/needs elite star power - with Demidov fitting that description for them - then maybe they'd accept it?

Thanks for the conversation!</div></div>

No. Reinbacher is not part of the conversation.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 9 at 10:46 a.m.

Thread: Serious offer to move up to 2 Chicago

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Voice_Of_Thruth</b></div><div>''You'd make for a terrible gm'' lmao as this wasnt a site to post mock trades and receive feedback calm tf down stop moaning and crying about everything</div></div>

lol exactly...some folks don't understand why this website exists. I guess his photo matches his persona. Burke is wrong about 75% of the time anyways

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 9 at 10:45 a.m.

Thread: Serious offer to move up to 2 Chicago

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JK74</b></div><div>In a draft where picks 2-6 are a crap shoot, you're way overpaying for that #2 pick. Provided Chicago's FO hasn't fallen in love with a prospect they'd be stupid not to accept. The way I see it, one of Demidov or Lindstrom is still available at #5.</div></div>

Ya I get what you're saying about Lindstrom/Demidov. The issue for the CH is we can't afford to draft another injury-uncertain prospect. Dach is supposed to be our 2C and he's one more injury away from maybe having a very short career. That's why I don't want to draft Lindstrom

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 9 at 10:43 a.m.

Thread: What it takes to move UP to 2

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LivingAnew</b></div><div>I don't see the 9th OA? I agree this would be an insanely strong offer. For me, the CGY pick has so many conditions to it that I'd rather have something a bit more certain...

What about MTL's #5 OA, along with MTL's 2025 1st round pick, plus Barron and Beck, for CHI's #2 OA?</div></div>

No Habs won't trade that.. because that 2025 1st rounder can also be a strong lottery pick, obviously the Habs wouldn't trade that.
That CGY pick is pretty certain, most of the conditions are already gone. Its almost certain to be CGY's pick next year

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 9 at 10:35 a.m.

Thread: What it takes to move UP to 2

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>As in 5th OA + 9th OA + 27th OA + multiple prospects/young-players?

Personally, I wouldn't have much interest in Arber. But, that would be a pretty insane offer I think would be very difficult to pass on. Then again, you can get all the assets you want, but one great player for the next 20 years could be worth staying put. My initial feeling is that CHI would accept, but it's still something that I would have to think about before making any brash decisions.</div></div>

no, not 9th OA. that CGY pick is next year.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 9 at 10:20 a.m.

Thread: Moving up in the standings

orrrrrr...... can I interest you in a trade? https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/5116662

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 9 at 9:50 a.m.

Thread: What it takes to move UP to 2

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>haha. For sure. That would be pretty stupid. I have a feeling the scouting staff under Doneghey is gonna be pounding on the table for Levshunov and make him think about it more. But there really shouldn't be any question. Personally, I would take Buium over Levshunov, and I'm definitely not drafting Buium 2nd overall. So, that should tell you where I'm at.</div></div>

So, just for Hits and Giggles, what would you accept to swap #2 with Habs #5?
Would you accept Wpg 1st rd, Cgy 1st rd 2025, Arber Xhekaj and 1 of Beck/Mesar?

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 9 at 8:25 a.m.

Thread: What it takes to move UP to 2

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>At 20th overall or later, sure, CHI should take some defensemen, preferably RD. But, with the 2nd overall pick the only correct choice is Ivan Demidov, IMO. He is in a class of his own after Celebrini. He might even end up being the bigger star, ultimately.</div></div>

Yea I really agree about Demidov. I just hope Davidson is too stupid to take him.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 9 at 8:21 a.m.

Thread: If We Draft Levshunov 5OA Trade Up for Sennecke 12OA

My thoughts, if Mtl trades up for any pick, it better be from #5 to #2. If they have to trade 2 more first rounders and give up a player like Xhekaj, I don't care.
Only untouchables are: Suzuki, Caufield, Guhle, Hutson, Reinbacher, and Fowler.
Besides that? IF Montreal stays at 5, there is a 100% chance Lindstrom or Iginla is there, take one of them.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 9 at 8:16 a.m.

Thread: What it takes to move UP to 2

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>haha. Idk about that. CHI needs offense more than Montreal does. We are stacked on D. We could maybe use a bit more depth of right shot D, but our GM doesn't seem too concerned with handedness. Demidov has to be the right answer for CHI at 2nd overall. I can't see any other way for them and it's unlikely we will ever be picking quite this high for a while. But I guess we'll see.</div></div>

I don't know. To be completely honest I don't think CHI is 'stacked' on D. But yes, I know not everyone shares my opinion. Properly an unpopular one.
If I'm CHI, its tough. Because if Reichel and Nazar were further ahead in their development, I would definitely take one of those Dmen.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 8 at 4:57 p.m.

Thread: jajajja

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caufield</b></div><div>MTL even sends a signed Slafkovsky jersey as a thank-you gift!</div></div>

Sure it's a good trade, but Mtl is in no hurry to dump $$ for capspace.
Just let Gallagher rot on 3rd line and send Anderson to Minors if we have to

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 8 at 4:56 p.m.

Thread: Trading Mr Marner

I thought he was a god
God's cant be Misters, mister

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 8 at 4:55 p.m.

Thread: What it takes to move UP to 2

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>It's a strong offer, seeing as there isn't as huge of a gap in talent between 2 and 5 this year as most years. But, I think CHI probably stays put. We'll see though. I wouldn't hate it if they got an absolute haul for trading back a few spots.</div></div>

Yea as a Habs fan, I would hate this deal.
However, Anaheim and Chi are 2 teams who I think would consider trading down to #5 with Montreal. THey can use Dmen and they both know Mtl needs Omen

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 8 at 4:53 p.m.

Thread: What it takes to move UP to 2

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>exo2769</b></div><div>Who would you even draft if you got to #2. They might be there at #5.</div></div>

Demidov at #2. He's really good.
People say he'll maybe be a 100 point player, and Celebrini is like Toews 2.0....
Kinda makes you wonder why Demidov isn't considered #1. I guess it's cause Celebrini has a much higher floor

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 8 at 5:23 a.m.

Thread: PLD trading bad contracts for bad

OHHH...habs take that all day!

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 6 at 10:06 a.m.

Thread: PLD for Marner who gives more

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RipNasty</b></div><div>A guy who's been a disappointment for years vs a 100 point Selke finalist. This isn't a good starts. It's a trainwreck.</div></div>

Don't agree. Marner has full NMC and his contract is up. Leafs won't get fair value for MM, who is also overpaid to boot.
I agree Kings would have to add, but Leafs won't get someone like Mccann for MM

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 5 at 3:44 p.m.

Thread: Mtl picks 5th

I'm loving how everyone is sleeping on Mailloux
The guy is a future top4 guy.
I wouldn't trade him away in this package

12 Next

Page 1

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

Ste_Catherine_Street

Member Since

Favourite Team

2nd Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day