FunMustBeAlways Profile - CapFriendly

Forum: Armchair-GM16 hours ago

Thread: Sharks in 2025 with Draisaitl Pesce Bertuzzi Trade for Rasmus Andersson

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Birtle34</b></div><div>Random question what’s an offer from Utah at 6 to go to 1 that sj couldn’t refuse, Was building an Utah splash build, and trying to figure out right offer. 2firsts and 3 seconds?</div></div>

I would ask for some combo of keller, cooley or guenther. steep price but i think celebrini would mean a lot if not more than that to sj

Forum: Trade Machine Proposals16 hours ago

Thread: Dont roast me too badly

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>WillyMackyWilly</b></div><div>Well, to be fair I did have a long-term extension with Marner in mind for the sharks. I also believe he's getting undervalued due to his playoff struggles, this is a consistent 90+ point guy that changes the offensive outlook of any team he goes to. Playoff performer or not aside, no matter who wants to trade for marner you can't get away with some mediocre package. Especially with how horrid my sharks were this year, you're gonna have to cough up a little extra to get these quality assets. Just my outlook, you say "long term pieces." I say "1 possible long term piece and the rest will inevitably be moved anyways".. why not now?</div></div>

Right but the playoff underperforming, huge cap hit, full no-move clause and 1 year of term left before hitting UFA is what is dragging down his value. Given an extension comes secured it does raise the value some, but I wouldn't call that a given. Had the Leafs wanted to trade him 3 years ago, this would be a whole different conversation. I don't disagree that he's very talented - he is and would cost some pieces but the value the Sharks are giving up here is pretty over the top. Also I don't understand the rationale behind pieces that will "inevitably" be moved.

Addison and Wiesblatt have little value.
Granlund you can get a 2nd out of this upcoming deadline probably
Ferraro a late 1st
Halttunen is a decent 2nd round prospect.
And then another 2 high 2nd rounders in the next 2 drafts.

Granlund is the only player there who's most likely getting moved. Everyone else is a prospect or pick the Sharks should hold onto and Ferraro will only be traded for the right price.

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsTue. at 10:30 p.m.

Thread: Dont roast me too badly

this is incredibly tilted in the leafs favor

even if marner for a year was worth 14th overall (he's not), we'd basically be trading granlund, ferraro, halttunen, addison, wiesblatt, two 2nds and a 4th for Niemela...

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 6:43 p.m.

Thread: Cant wait for the playoffs

Sharks would be lucky to have Anderson at $9 million let alone $3M. We'll even throw in 14th overall.

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 1:19 a.m.

Thread: Moves

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>vols94</b></div><div>SJ has SJ sharkie, Why do we need to pay a pick for another mascot?</div></div>

at least sj sharkie doesn't entirely suck at hockey too :tearsofjoy

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 1:16 a.m.

Thread: Mikeb1025

So Berggren = 3rd rounder

Fabbri cap dump = Late round pick (4th maybe) - he's fine and his contract isn't a burden but it's still a cap clearing move for Detroit.

Copp cap dump = 1st rounder - dude is making almost $6 mill to put up barely over 30 points for the next 3 years. Big offload.

Sharks will not be adding the more valuable pick here lol.

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 1:08 a.m.

Thread: Demko

I actually think you could ask for the Sharks 33OA if you wanted to offer us 10OA. Sharks have the assets and wouldn't have the leverage between the two teams.

Not like I'd prefer to trade a higher pick but just realistically speaking.

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 12:50 a.m.

Thread: brand new 3rd line

sometimes I really can't tell if CF posts are serious

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 12:29 a.m.

Thread: Mike Grier Brain Worm

Sharks are gonna have to pay more to acquire the elite talents possessed by Josh Anderson, Ryan Reaves, Joonas Korpisalo and Jack Campbell. :rolleyes

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 10 at 6:36 a.m.

Thread: An Outsiders Vision - COL

I know Girard's ceiling is probably higher but he's kinda fallen off. I think SJ would rather trade Ferraro for picks at this rate.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 9 at 4:21 a.m.

Thread: rebuild

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Letsgosharks</b></div><div>I love how we casually offer sheeted mercer for 700k</div></div>

as one does

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 8 at 11:13 p.m.

Thread: Wrecking A Mack

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>cody_tugak</b></div><div>To be honest, I thought no one would be willing to take on Campbell, but I guess the sharks are rebuilding, and they will be tanking for the next couple seasons or so</div></div>

yeah they would (and should at the right price). If worst comes to worst he can be buried too.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 8 at 11:04 p.m.

Thread: rebuild

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>StutzlesNumber1Fan</b></div><div>I'm surprised he didn't ask for Will Smith in the deal too</div></div>

maybe slide over eklund too as a sweetener :laugh

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 8 at 11:03 p.m.

Thread: Go Leafs Go

you can remove the retention

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 8 at 10:56 p.m.

Thread: Wrecking A Mack

Trade is honestly pretty fair value-wise.

Maybe throw in Rodrigue since SJ is lacking in the goalie department? Especially after trading Blackwood.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 8 at 10:49 p.m.

Thread: Correcting Dorions Mistakes

not convinced a 4th and next years 2nd is enough to entice SJ to take on a guy who actively loses his team games for 4x4.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 8 at 10:45 p.m.

Thread: Help bedard

Hawks get robbed here value-wise.

If the sharks were paying that price, they would likely only move up to like 4-6OA max

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 8 at 10:41 p.m.

Thread: rebuild

Perfect no issues here

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 8 at 4:23 p.m.

Thread: -39 player

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hawksguy81</b></div><div>Using this logic, Bedard was a -44 this season. Guess the Hawks need to trade him too!</div></div>

we'll take him! we'll even offer our -14 Jack Studnicka. Dude's 30 +/- better than bedard so chicago is really the winner here

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 8 at 12:57 p.m.

Thread: Playoffs next year maybe

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>AStovetop</b></div><div>Crazy how people think the Sharks are dying to add salary to their cap. As if they can't just overpay some ACTUALLY good players in free agency to make their team better.

They could throw 7.5 mil at Stephenson, 6 mil at Domi, and 5.5 at Demelo and STILL be about 6 mil under the cap (and that's with Couture's 8 mil accounted for, who likely won't even play)</div></div>

Yeah but that wouldn't be as convenient as the Sharks paying their 1st overall or 14th overall for cap dumps from other teams :'(

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsMay 8 at 3:23 a.m.

Thread: Depending on whos still available

hefty price for 2 spots of movement. Sharks might consider if you take out one of the 2nd rounders.

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsMay 8 at 3:18 a.m.

Thread: If Iginla is still available at 14

I'd pay the NJD 2nd and B-prospect at most.

If not, just wait a couple years till his value is lower or he walks in FA.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 7 at 9:13 p.m.

Thread: Idk man

Invert the picks please

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 7 at 8:03 p.m.

Thread: Sharks Move Back

The catch is the prospect has to actually be good...

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 7 at 7:20 p.m.

Thread: HALLELUJAH

My honest reaction

<div class="yt_out_cont"><div class="yt_cont"><iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/UZsfr0go6CwsiSFjQ8EoC7dywvGhn" frameborder="0"></iframe></div></div>

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

FunMustBeAlways

Member Since

Favourite Team

2nd Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day