mv21227 Profile - CapFriendly

Forum: Armchair-GM11 minutes ago

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>aadoyle</b></div><div>WPG has Pionk, Schmidt, and will probs push to extend Demelo

Hronek makes no sense for them</div></div>

Pionk sucks, Schmidt is a natural LD, and there’s no guarantee Demelo re-signs

Hronek makes a lot of sense for them

Forum: Trade Machine Proposals4 hours ago

Thread: NJD - Van Hughes Brothers play together

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>Hughes has 6 years at 8 mill. Pettersson+Demko for Hughes would maybe get a not immediate hang up.

Lek+1st for Luke+Holtz+Marino does get an immediate hang up

Or to put it simply.

Hughes>>>>>>>>Pettersson
Hughes>>>Lek
Holtz>1st

2 years of an injury prone goalie doesn't have that much value</div></div>

If we make it more realistic and take out Marino
Jack >> EP40
Luke ~= Lekkerimaki + 1st
Holtz <<<<<< Demko

Neither team does that though

Forum: Armchair-GM4 hours ago

Thread: Canucks return

That’s not close for Ehlers

Forum: Armchair-GM6 hours ago

Thread: 1748

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>kingkanuck</b></div><div>Why not? They're getting the 2017 - 7th OA (Andersson) pick back.
Not all first round picks are stars and there is no guarantee that the Canucks 2026 first will ever make the NHL.
But what they will get is money to help sign Necas.</div></div>

That 1st round pick can be used to acquire an impactful asset at the deadline. I also don’t think it would cost a 1st to cost Mikheyev

Forum: Armchair-GM9 hours ago

Thread: 1748

Canucks aren’t paying a 1st to dump Mikheyev

Forum: Armchair-GM14 hours ago

Thread: Marner

Joshua doesn’t take that contract, and going with a 20 man roster is a bad idea

Forum: Armchair-GM15 hours ago

Thread: Mikheyev gone

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JK74</b></div><div>The general consensus is that it'll take a 2nd to dump Mikheyev. Chicago probably wouldn't have any interest in bringing Suter back so if you remove Suter and the 4th Chicago probably accepts.</div></div>

It also makes a lot more sense for the Canucks to keep Suter rather than move him for a 4th. Both sides would definitely be happier taking those pieces out

Forum: Armchair-GM16 hours ago

Thread: Longterm with the UFAs

Take Raty out of the first trade and maybe. Even then not sure I’d do it

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 2:16 a.m.

Thread: 2 biggest problems gone

Canucks pass

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsYesterday at 1:38 a.m.

Thread: Van - LaK Danualt waives his NMC

On behalf of Canucks fans I apologize to all LA fans for this post

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 1:28 a.m.

Thread: Retool

Canucks don’t consider that

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 1:28 a.m.

Thread: Retool via other teams lopsided trades

More than fair for Suter but I think it makes more sense for the Canucks to keep him

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 12:09 a.m.

Thread: Small changes

Canucks pass easily. Mikheyev > Anderson

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 11:59 p.m.

Thread: Garland and Luostarinen

As much as I’d hate to lose Garland the Canucks probably have to accept that

Forum: NHLYesterday at 11:40 p.m.

Thread: 2023-2024 NHL Discussion Thread #6: The Quest for Lord Stanley's Cup

That Pettersson “charging” penalty… might be one of the worst calls I’ve ever seen

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 10:56 p.m.

Thread: Lucky to get a 1st

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caufield</b></div><div>good comp imo is 2nd DeBrincat trade</div></div>

Fiala trade as well

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 9:28 p.m.

Thread: One more off season rebuilding

Think the Canucks would rather use a pick to get rid of Mikheyev/add Kovacevic, but I’d probably still do that deal

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 9:27 p.m.

Thread: You cant tell me this team cant win a stanley cup

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JaredOfLondon</b></div><div>Never said he was better, just that if garland is worth such a haul for putting up such meh scoring numbers suddenly then jarnkrok must be worth a haul too because he's cheaper, doesnt need to be retained and isn't much worse an over all player.
IE, you are massively over rating a middle six guy's value</div></div>

Liljegren, Robertson, and a 3rd is hardly a haul for a 45-50 point winger who’s extremely good defensively and an elite play driver with 50% retention for 2 seasons

He’d be the Leafs best forward outside of the core 4

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 9:14 p.m.

Thread: You cant tell me this team cant win a stanley cup

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JaredOfLondon</b></div><div>Lol, yeah dude, the guy canucks fans spent most of the last 2 years trying to dump on everyone is so so good now. Amazing stuff</div></div>

Among players with 40+ GP on either the Leafs and Canucks Garland was
10th in goals
11th in points
12th in G/60
8th in A1/60
11th in P/60
3rd in GF%
3rd in SF%
1st in FF%
2nd in CF%
1st in xGF%
9th in GF/60
3rd in GA/60
9th in xGF/60
2nd in xGA/60

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 9:10 p.m.

Thread: You cant tell me this team cant win a stanley cup

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JaredOfLondon</b></div><div>No, he really isn't.</div></div>

Garland had more goals, more assists, and more points. A better GPG, APG, and PPG. Better G/60, A/60, and P/60

Garland also had a better GF%, SF%, FF%, CF%, xGF%, GF/60, GA/60, SA/60, FF/60, FA/60, CF/60, CA/60, and xGA/60

So please tell me how Jarnkrok is better?

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 9:04 p.m.

Thread: You cant tell me this team cant win a stanley cup

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JaredOfLondon</b></div><div>Wow, the leafs can get an insane haul for jarnkrok then, they dont even nees to retain and hed still cost almost 500k less!</div></div>

Garland is miles better than Jarnkrok and it’s not even close lmao

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 8:55 p.m.

Thread: You cant tell me this team cant win a stanley cup

Canucks pass easily

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 8:55 p.m.

Thread: You cant tell me this team cant win a stanley cup

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JaredOfLondon</b></div><div>Not having a guy who has proven he can be a starter is a good reason why they cant win a cup.
Also garland isnt worth near that.</div></div>

You’re right Garland is worth more than that, especially with retention

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 4:50 p.m.

Thread: Hronek

Canucks obviously pass on that deal. And if Hronek was gonna sign for that much he’d be extended already

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 4:46 p.m.

Thread: Superstar swap

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Herb_Brooks</b></div><div>marner was also not playing at a 100%. im not giving him any benefit of the doubt as its not the first time he hasnt showed up in the playoffs but its true he wasnt at 100%

pettersson should be able to elevate his linemates though</div></div>

Pettersson has created chances for his linemates but guys like Mikheyev and Lafferty have no scoring touch and are typically unable to create chances for him

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

mv21227

Member Since

Favourite Team

2nd Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day