SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Jacketsman61

Member Since
May 15, 2016
Favourite Team
Columbus Blue Jackets
2nd Favourite Team
Colorado Avalanche
Forum Posts
4345
Posts per Day
1.5
Forum: Armchair-GM20 hours ago
Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 1:39 p.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CD282</b></div><div>First, I used your numbers - you were the one that suggested a $2.5M raise for both McDavid and Draisaitl. Here:
Second, all NHL contracts are paid in US dollars, so the Canadian dollar is not any issue whatsoever.

Third, Draisaitl didn't sign "at a steal", he got paid MORE than his closest comp (Pastrnak) at the time. It only appears to be a steal because he developed into the second best player in the world after he signed that deal.

Fourth, McDavid took less money on his last contract as a favor to the team. I fully expect him to take less than he would get on the open market again.

Fifth, the Oilers have won in the playoffs, they went to the division finals last year and the Conference finals the year before, both times losing only to the eventual Stanley Cup champions. The Knights openly said last year that the Oilers were their toughest opponent. And they only beat them by illegally axe chopping Draisaitl's arm.</div></div>

I know that but Canada has higher tax. That matters. I said 11+ mil that means this is on the low end. One could think with the cap going up, most players are now going to start moving towards FA again. The reason FA has been lackluster the past few years is bc of the flat cap. That is going to change. McDavid did them a solid and has got nothing to show for it. Do you think he really is just going to do it again? Draisaitl knows his value. Edm cannot go into this season without Draisaitl under contract.
Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 11:20 a.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CaseyFlyman</b></div><div>Disregarding the trades (which we all have thoughts on), and looking only at the team:
1. The center depth is insanely good.
2. The goalie tandem is just fine.
3. That's it.

The left wings are a 30 year old who hasn't regained his form, two centers, and a replacement-level 20-year-old. The right side is a 2nd-line scoring winger, a transition guy, an undersized forward with one game of experience, and an enforcer. Boqvist is your top-pair RD, and he's only good for about 50 games a year right now. Mateychuk hasn't played an NHL game.

Even in the "cards all in, let's be good now" scenario we're still relying on a new goaltender to our system, a JG resurgence, the quick development of half the roster to reach their potential immediately, and a D-core that might actually be bottom-10 in the league.

I get the desire to be competitive, and I get the creativity, but I think this mostly proves that the <em><strong>only </strong></em>option is to make small moves, tinker with the non-core players, and just wait for the actual young core to fully develop. 2025-26 is the year to start pushing, at the earliest.</div></div>

Really Mateychuk probably starts in Cleveland. Blankenburg would be perfectly suited to fit the role until he is ready we just as easily not do the SJ trade keep the pick get a top RD and develop them. The two best years in our franchise was when we had Bread. We need another guy like that. Fantilli maybe eventually but he isn’t there yet and we would be foolish not to take advantage of Gaudreau. Gaudreau needs an elite C to be truly effective.
Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 11:14 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 5:41 a.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CertifiedAverage</b></div><div>If I recall correctly, the top 10 is really good, while the late 1st round is a step down and not all that different from the 2nd round. So I would be keen to keep that top 6 pick and not be very interested in trading down to a 13th or 14th. At this stage, I would rather see them just sign a player like Brenden Dillon, keep the top pick and try to sell Provorov at 50 % retained for another 1st.

I agree that the CBJ need to use some combination of our good prospects to get a fantastic player to take the next step. If Draisaitl decides to leave Edmonton, I wouldn't be surpried if he ends up a UFA though. The Blue Jackets would then be in a position to give him a really good offer. As I said, they are one of the few teams that can give him a high salary (in combination with lower taxes). In parallel with that, you can trade some of the prospects to strengthen the top 6, which would give Columbus Draisaitl and another top player. A sign-and-trade situation might be on the cards in the 2025 off-season and if so then yes, Columbus should be heavily involved. But even then, it will be a few teams involved and Draisaitl decides where he gets to go, so his salary will still be high. In the ACGM scenario, Edmonton have no incentive to move him and thus need a very strong offer. It's a pipe dream anyway. I assume he will re-sign in Edmonton.

Next year is a development step for the players and the season in which the GM starts to discern what players he wants to build around, in my opinion. Selling the sun and the mopn looking to compete next year already might have long-term negative consequences.</div></div>

There is no money in Edm. That is clear. McDavid comes up for contract the summer after that. Do you really think Edm can pay Draisaitl around 11+ mil and give a hefty increase to McDavid, who on the open market, could garner at least 15 to 16 mil per? Not going to happen. RNH has a NMC so they can’t move him either. They are already lacking on defense and goaltending. They can’t justify spending more to retain Draisaitl while ignoring the real problems or otherwise McDavid will walk.
Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 4:17 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 4:10 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 5:38 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 5:24 a.m.