SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

RUS of MTL

Created by: habitantlecolon
Team: 2024-25 Montreal Canadiens
Initial Creation Date: May 14, 2024
Published: May 14, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,150,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$6,125,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Tsyplakov, Maxim
1$975,000
Demidov, Ivan
3$975,000
Trades
CHI
  1. Barron, Justin [RFA Rights]
  2. 2025 3rd round pick (VAN)
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the COL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the WSH
2025
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the DET
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
2026
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$87,700,000$86,608,750$1,022,500$3,920,000$1,091,250
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,850,000$7,850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 7
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,875,000$7,875,000
C
UFA - 6
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,500,000$4M)
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Demidov, Ivan
$975,000$975,000
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,362,500$3,362,500
C, RW
RFA - 2
Tsyplakov, Maxim
$975,000$975,000
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$835,000$835,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,900,000$2,900,000
C, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,400,000$3,400,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,700,000$1,700,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,875,000$4,875,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$6,125,000$6,125,000
RD
UFA
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,150,000$3,150,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$420,000$420K)
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$875,000$875,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$890,000$890,000
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,150,000$1,150,000
LD/RD
RFA
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$766,667$766,667
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$10,500,000$10,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,400,000$1,400,000
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$812,500$812,500 ($0$0$0$0)
LW, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 14 at 4:41 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 3,278
Likes: 2,237
When people say the Blackhawks need RD, we don't mean 3rd pairing RD
PaulKorea liked this.
May 14 at 4:58 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 1,534
I wouldn't mind Barron, I'm just not paying one of our only forward prospects of stature for the privledge and a third for a team that has 12 picks better in the next 2 drafts don;t really excite.
Garak liked this.
May 14 at 5:43 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 11,805
Likes: 12,035
Quoting: SlickWilly
When people say the Blackhawks need RD, we don't mean 3rd pairing RD


An RD who is 3rd pair right now but is young and has some untapped upside is fine. We don't necessarily need a top four RD for at least two years. That said, Barron is not valuable enough to pull off a deal like this, IMO. I don't really like the idea of moving Dach, but I also wouldn't say he is unavailable.
May 14 at 6:10 p.m.
#4
Tamarindo Costa Rica
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 590
Likes: 44
I am not sure Dach is a good pick up for Habs. Dach had 11 goals in the AHL this season while Barron scored 7 goals in NHL in 48 games.
May 14 at 7:05 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 3,278
Likes: 2,237
Quoting: Garak
An RD who is 3rd pair right now but is young and has some untapped upside is fine. We don't necessarily need a top four RD for at least two years. That said, Barron is not valuable enough to pull off a deal like this, IMO. I don't really like the idea of moving Dach, but I also wouldn't say he is unavailable.


That's fair. I don't think Barron is that guy. My initial point is also based on the post assuming the Hawks take Levshunov with the Habs having Demidov.
Garak liked this.
May 14 at 7:08 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 9,399
Likes: 11,611
Hawks decline. Rather keep Dach.
Garak and PaulKorea liked this.
May 14 at 8:56 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 11,805
Likes: 12,035
Quoting: SlickWilly
That's fair. I don't think Barron is that guy. My initial point is also based on the post assuming the Hawks take Levshunov with the Habs having Demidov.


Oh ok. Gotcha. I really hope CHI doesn't take Levshunov. THIS pretty accurately explains why I don't want to use a 2nd overall on him. There will be guys later in this draft, in future drafts, free agency, and available through trade, if and when we need to target a big RD.

IMO, there is a gap between Celebrini and Demidov, and then a BIG drop off after that without much change in the caliber of player you are getting through most of the 1st round. In most drafts, you can get guys like Levshunov anywhere from 10th overall through the early 2nd round.

Even if he is guaranteed to become a superstar, it is not imperative that our 1RD is a superstar. CHI's superstar dman could easily already be in our system and could be a lefty. In which case, we just need solid RD's who can eat minutes. There are a lot of RD's with that kind of potential in the late 1st round through the 2nd round this year. I actually like Emery and Brunicke more than I like Levshunov. I also like Buium more than I like Levshunov, even if he is a left shot.

I think he is a good and intriguing young RD, but he is also overrated because of his size and handedness, and probably doesn't belong in the top 10 of the average NHL draft.
SlickWilly liked this.
May 14 at 9:15 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 3,278
Likes: 2,237
Quoting: Garak
Oh ok. Gotcha. I really hope CHI doesn't take Levshunov. THIS pretty accurately explains why I don't want to use a 2nd overall on him. There will be guys later in this draft, in future drafts, free agency, and available through trade, if and when we need to target a big RD.

IMO, there is a gap between Celebrini and Demidov, and then a BIG drop off after that without much change in the caliber of player you are getting through most of the 1st round. In most drafts, you can get guys like Levshunov anywhere from 10th overall through the early 2nd round.

Even if he is guaranteed to become a superstar, it is not imperative that our 1RD is a superstar. CHI's superstar dman could easily already be in our system and could be a lefty. In which case, we just need solid RD's who can eat minutes. There are a lot of RD's with that kind of potential in the late 1st round through the 2nd round this year. I actually like Emery and Brunicke more than I like Levshunov. I also like Buium more than I like Levshunov, even if he is a left shot.

I think he is a good and intriguing young RD, but he is also overrated because of his size and handedness, and probably doesn't belong in the top 10 of the average NHL draft.


Yeah I mean I just think it comes down to at 2 OA you have to go BPA regardless of position, and I think that's demidov. There are some intriguing defensive prospects to be had at 20 and 34, if Davidson pleases. Rinzel's development has been nice. Like you said, plenty of teams win the cup without a superstar defenseman. The Avalanche are pretty much an outlier. I'd call guys like Hedman and Petro stars, but not superstars.
Garak liked this.
May 14 at 9:29 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 11,805
Likes: 12,035
Quoting: SlickWilly
Yeah I mean I just think it comes down to at 2 OA you have to go BPA regardless of position, and I think that's demidov. There are some intriguing defensive prospects to be had at 20 and 34, if Davidson pleases. Rinzel's development has been nice. Like you said, plenty of teams win the cup without a superstar defenseman. The Avalanche are pretty much an outlier. I'd call guys like Hedman and Petro stars, but not superstars.


For sure. Did you watch that scouting video I linked? The youtube channel is pretty new, but the kid isn't half bad.
SlickWilly liked this.
May 14 at 9:57 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Le patriote
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 6,595
Likes: 1,464
Quoting: Garak
For sure. Did you watch that scouting video I linked? The youtube channel is pretty new, but the kid isn't half bad.


So you guys draft Demidov?
Garak liked this.
May 15 at 8:10 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 11,805
Likes: 12,035
Quoting: habitantlecolon
So you guys draft Demidov?


I sure hope so. It should be a pretty easy decision, but I wouldn't be surprised to see them overthink things and take someone else.
habitantlecolon and Patches liked this.
May 15 at 9:56 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 1,674
Why are Habs fans so insistent on trading for Dach?
Garak liked this.
May 15 at 10:10 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 2,043
Quoting: klassic
Why are Habs fans so insistent on trading for Dach?


Dachs are like pokemon. Gotta catch em all!
Garak, habitantlecolon and klassic liked this.
May 15 at 1:06 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 11,805
Likes: 12,035
Quoting: klassic
Why are Habs fans so insistent on trading for Dach?


I think it is mainly @habitantlecolon. But, personally, even if they didn't already have Kirby, I absolutely see the allure. He plays a very desirable game. If he hits at the NHL level, he is going to be an important piece of whatever team he is playing for and be a fan favorite.
PaulKorea and habitantlecolon liked this.
May 15 at 1:11 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Le patriote
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 6,595
Likes: 1,464
Quoting: Garak
I think it is mainly habitantlecolon. But, personally, even if they didn't already have Kirby, I absolutely see the allure. He plays a very desirable game. If he hits at the NHL level, he is going to be an important piece of whatever team he is playing for and be a fan favorite.


I've been asking for Dack, Faksa, or Sturm for the HABS nation for more than a year (Faksa 5 yrs no joke) because I see something in those players that fit our system
Garak liked this.
May 15 at 1:12 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Le patriote
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 6,595
Likes: 1,464
Quoting: klassic
Why are Habs fans so insistent on trading for Dach?


it's all my fault. I've been doing AGM about undervalued players that fit our system for years because I really like those kinds of hardworking players.
Garak liked this.
May 15 at 1:57 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 1,674
Quoting: habitantlecolon
it's all my fault. I've been doing AGM about undervalued players that fit our system for years because I really like those kinds of hardworking players.


Either you have posted 20 ACGMs in the past few months (and I never noticed it was the same person) or others are posting too.
May 15 at 2:02 p.m.
#18
Thread Starter
Le patriote
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 6,595
Likes: 1,464
Quoting: klassic
Either you have posted 20 ACGMs in the past few months (and I never noticed it was the same person) or others are posting too.


closer to 200 wink ! And I also greatly influenced other AGM because I'm always chatting.
klassic liked this.
May 15 at 5:58 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 3,278
Likes: 2,237
Quoting: Garak
For sure. Did you watch that scouting video I linked? The youtube channel is pretty new, but the kid isn't half bad.


I did, and he makes some points. I think for him it's more about projection than current ability (which is also good). I've seen him up and down on lists. He's got the tools, and Davidson likes tools. At the end of the day, if Davidson thinks he's the 2nd best player in the draft and picks him, I'll be on board with it.
Garak liked this.
May 15 at 6:19 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 11,805
Likes: 12,035
Quoting: SlickWilly
I did, and he makes some points. I think for him it's more about projection than current ability (which is also good). I've seen him up and down on lists. He's got the tools, and Davidson likes tools. At the end of the day, if Davidson thinks he's the 2nd best player in the draft and picks him, I'll be on board with it.


Exactly my point. I'm sick of sitting around and tearing the kid apart, because I do think he is good and I don't want to take anything away from him. I just don't believe he is worth our 2nd overall pick in this draft. But, along the lines of what you said, if KD picks him, what else can we do but hope for the best?
SlickWilly liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll