SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Two players I am interested in

Created by: Kyle_Davidson
Team: 2024-25 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: May 13, 2024
Published: May 13, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I’m up for discussion.
Free Agent Signings
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$8,000,000
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. Jiricek, David
Additional Details:
He expressed some concerns with his NHL playing time, and while I don’t believe the Jackets would be interested in moving at this time I would really try to get him if the opportunity presented itself.
CBJ
  1. Rinzel, Sam [Reserve List]
  2. 2024 1st round pick (TBL)
  3. 2024 2nd round pick (LAK)
Additional Details:
I could try a number of different approaches, prospect based, roster player based, outside of Bedard I would consider a lot.
2.
CBJ
  1. 2026 2nd round pick (NYI)
Additional Details:
Conditional based on GP.
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CHI
2025
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2026
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$83,500,000$73,595,000$0$7,675,000$9,905,000
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$8,700,000$8,700,000
C, RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,500,000$4M)
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LW, C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$900,000$900K)
RW, C
RFA - 2
$8,000,000$8,000,000
RW, LW
UFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,200,000$1,200,000
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,250,000$4,250,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,250,000$4,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$912,500$912,500 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$918,333$918,333 (Performance Bonus$1,000,000$1M)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,250,000$4,250,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,600,000$4,600,000
LD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$918,333$918,333 (Performance Bonus$1,000,000$1M)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$962,500$962,500
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,400,000$4,400,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 13 at 5:24 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 849
Likes: 975
The only thing that CHI has that can get them Jiricek is Bedard, and thats not going to happen. Laine wont be traded at his lowest value unless he requests a trade. Since that hasnt happened there is no reason for the Jackets to trade him unless someone wants to overpay.
dopplsan, SK101, Viqsi and 2 others liked this.
May 13 at 5:25 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 967
Likes: 1,139
Quoting: BoomerTheHero
The only thing that CHI has that can get them Jiricek is Bedard, and thats not going to happen.


Well at least you're not overvaluing him or anything. lol.
yikes, Garak, RicXX and 1 other person liked this.
May 13 at 5:28 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 849
Likes: 975
Quoting: ginandtacos
Well at least you're not overvaluing him or anything. lol.


Im not saying they are equal value, just that the other pieces you have wont get him. To trade him we would need either a young 1RD or a young top line player. The only position that is more valuable than 1RD is 1C.
dopplsan, SK101, Viqsi and 1 other person liked this.
May 13 at 5:29 p.m.
#4
CELEBRINI IS A SHARK
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 10,207
Likes: 12,915
Quoting: BoomerTheHero
The only thing that CHI has that can get them Jiricek is Bedard, and thats not going to happen. Laine wont be traded at his lowest value unless he requests a trade. Since that has happened there is no reason for the Jackets to trade him unless someone wants to overpay.


So what you’re saying is you wouldn’t even accept 2nd overall lol
May 13 at 5:29 p.m.
#5
Nah.
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 4,597
Likes: 4,568
Quoting: ginandtacos
Well at least you're not overvaluing him or anything. lol.


The point isn’t “Jiricek isn’t as good as Bedard,” the point is outside of Bedard (or CHI’s 1st in the next draft or two), CHI doesn’t have anything CBJ want.

Just not good trade partners.
BoomerTheHero, SK101, Viqsi and 2 others liked this.
May 13 at 5:31 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 849
Likes: 975
Quoting: yikes
So what you’re saying is you wouldn’t even accept 2nd overall lol


Maybe, it would depend on how our FO saw the top defensemen in this draft compared to Jiricek and if they wanted to wait the additional time for the new draft pick to be ready.
SK101, Viqsi and benjgc liked this.
May 13 at 5:40 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 41,962
Likes: 19,049
CHI gives: Rinzel, 2nd overall, 20th overall
CBJ gives: Jiricek, 4th overall
May 13 at 5:46 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 11,805
Likes: 12,035
I'm not sure why you would be THIS interested in Jiricek. I would much rather keep Rinzel and the picks.
Kyle_Davidson, ginandtacos, LivingAnew and 3 others liked this.
May 13 at 5:53 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 3,407
Likes: 3,163
Quoting: NHLfan10506
CHI gives: Rinzel, 2nd overall, 20th overall
CBJ gives: Jiricek, 4th overall



This is a bad trade for the jackets. not enough difference in the 2nd OA and 4OA this year. Certainly not enough difference for jiricek to be involved.
BoomerTheHero, Viqsi and benjgc liked this.
May 13 at 5:59 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 41,962
Likes: 19,049
Quoting: SK101
This is a bad trade for the jackets. not enough difference in the 2nd OA and 4OA this year. Certainly not enough difference for jiricek to be involved.


Demidov, Sennecke, Rinzel
vs
Jiricek, Silayev
May 13 at 6:02 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 10,023
Likes: 6,114
Quoting: Garak
I'm not sure why you would be THIS interested in Jiricek. I would much rather keep Rinzel and the picks.


It’s really just gauging RD options, I’m a big Demidov guy at number 2, and want to see what a future RD pairing would cost the hawks at this point in their rebuild.
Garak, RicXX and PaulKorea liked this.
May 13 at 6:03 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 3,407
Likes: 3,163
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Demidov, Sennecke, Rinzel
vs
Jiricek, Silayev


Easy. jiricek and silayev. That’s a dominant top pair for the next decade. Not to mention the jackets have werenski and mateychuk too. Could be the best top 4 in the league if they pan out
BoomerTheHero, squashmaple, CaseyFlyman and 3 others liked this.
May 13 at 6:09 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 41,962
Likes: 19,049
Quoting: SK101
Easy. jiricek and silayev. That’s a dominant top pair for the next decade. Not to mention the jackets have werenski and mateychuk too. Could be the best top 4 in the league if they pan out


I have no dog in this fight…just offering my view of a fair deal. I’d prefer Rinzel to Mateychuk.
Garak liked this.
May 13 at 6:20 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 11,805
Likes: 12,035
Quoting: Kyle_Davidson
It’s really just gauging RD options, I’m a big Demidov guy at number 2, and want to see what a future RD pairing would cost the hawks at this point in their rebuild.


That's fair. I'm just not high on Jiricek, at all.
Kyle_Davidson and RicXX liked this.
May 13 at 7:15 p.m.
#15
not a he )
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 3,452
Likes: 4,826
Quoting: NHLfan10506
I have no dog in this fight…just offering my view of a fair deal. I’d prefer Rinzel to Mateychuk.


Why? Because he’s big? I can’t find a single prospect evaluator who agrees with you on that. On one side you have an elite skating former 12OA, WHL defensive player of the year and captain currently leading his team (likely) to its first ever WHL championship who’s actually two full weeks younger vs an average skating, rangy NCAA D who’s won no awards and projects to be a middle pairing player if he’s lucky. In fact, I actually prefer Mateychuk to Jiricek if I’m choosing between two Jackets prospects. So I’m curious what makes you draw that conclusion.
benjgc and SK101 liked this.
May 13 at 8:09 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 41,962
Likes: 19,049
Quoting: squashmaple
Why? Because he’s big? I can’t find a single prospect evaluator who agrees with you on that. On one side you have an elite skating former 12OA, WHL defensive player of the year and captain currently leading his team (likely) to its first ever WHL championship who’s actually two full weeks younger vs an average skating, rangy NCAA D who’s won no awards and projects to be a middle pairing player if he’s lucky. In fact, I actually prefer Mateychuk to Jiricek if I’m choosing between two Jackets prospects. So I’m curious what makes you draw that conclusion.


Just my personal preference. Rinzel is indeed bigger, but I like mobility and calmness. He is great with the puck in own zone, especially under pressure. He was Gophers top dman by end of this last season (Minnesota has been dman factory in recent years). He also played very well at WJC. He should get more attention from prospect evaluators going forward (I feel like many of them just base their lists off draft position).

I don’t want to take anything away from Mateychuk. He is good too. (Ty Smith won WHL dman of year twice in a row)
Kyle_Davidson and Garak liked this.
May 13 at 9:34 p.m.
#17
not a he )
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 3,452
Likes: 4,826
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Just my personal preference. Rinzel is indeed bigger, but I like mobility and calmness. He is great with the puck in own zone, especially under pressure. He was Gophers top dman by end of this last season (Minnesota has been dman factory in recent years). He also played very well at WJC. He should get more attention from prospect evaluators going forward (I feel like many of them just base their lists off draft position).

I don’t want to take anything away from Mateychuk. He is good too. (Ty Smith won WHL dman of year twice in a row)


So... because he's big. Got it.
May 13 at 9:52 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 41,962
Likes: 19,049
Quoting: squashmaple
So... because he's big. Got it.


Not because he is big.

Because I know him a lot better. I follow NCAA, especially big ten and watched him a ton this year.
Garak liked this.
May 14 at 6:41 a.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 11,805
Likes: 12,035
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Just my personal preference. Rinzel is indeed bigger, but I like mobility and calmness. He is great with the puck in own zone, especially under pressure. He was Gophers top dman by end of this last season (Minnesota has been dman factory in recent years). He also played very well at WJC. He should get more attention from prospect evaluators going forward (I feel like many of them just base their lists off draft position).

I don’t want to take anything away from Mateychuk. He is good too. (Ty Smith won WHL dman of year twice in a row)


I agree with all of this. @squashmaple said earlier that Rinzel is just an average skater, but that is wrong. Rinzel is not just a great skater for his size, but a great skater in general, and he likely only gets better.

A little off subject but for comparison, Rinzel is barely a year older than Levshunov and was also a rookie in the NCAA this past season. So, they were at a very similar point in their development. I can honestly say, as an observer without bias, that I liked Rinzel way more than I liked Levshunov. He's got the poise, compete, skating, size, range, physicality, effectiveness in all zones, tools, everything, to be an effective NHL dman. Also, I had always heard that the NCAA is a superior league to the entire CHL, yet I had no way of making that determination for myself. But, recently, after a few years of watching junior and college religiously, I finally see why people say that and I definitely believe it is true.

He and Mateychuk are completely different players. But, yeah, I also believe people are going to start to take notice of Rinzel very soon if they haven't already. Minnesota has a knack for churning out great dmen. So, if Rinzel takes another big step, he could be in the upper echelon of defensive prospect rankings very soon, if rankings are something that is important to you. Personally, public scout rankings are fun to look at and can be a useful starting point for doing your own scouting, but I like to make my own determinations.
Kyle_Davidson liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll